Cell-permeable bone morphogenetic protein (CP-BMP) recombinant protein and use thereof

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides the CP-BMP recombinant protein with technical advantages as an intracellular protein therapy for the treatment of bone defects caused by osteogenesis imperfecta, osteoporosis, fracture and osteoctomy in that it could resolve cell-/tissue-permeability and bio-transfer function.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Bypass Continuation of PCT International Application No. PCT/KR2016/009405 filed on Aug. 25, 2016, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C § 119(a) to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/838,318 filed on Aug. 27, 2015. Each of the above application(s) is hereby expressly incorporated by reference, in its entirety, into the present application.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to cell-permeable bone morphogenetic protein (CP-BMP) recombinant protein and use thereof. The recombinant protein of the present invention has on improved cell-permeability and biological activity as an intracellular protein therapy for regenerating of defected bone caused by osteogenesis imperfecta, osteoporosis, fracture and osteotomy.

BACKGROUND ART

Bone is a unique tissue that undergoes continuous remodeling throughout life and retains the potential for regeneration even in adult. Bone regeneration is required for bone defects caused by fracture and osteoporosis. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are multifunctional growth factors that belong to the transforming growth factor (TGF) superfamily. About 30 BMP-related proteins have been identified and can be subdivided into several groups based on their structures and functions. Especially, BMP2, BMP4 and BMP7 could induce chondrocyte-derived osteoprogenitor (CDOP) cell differentiation, and are important in bone formation and regeneration.

BMPs are synthesized as pre-pro peptides consisting of a signal peptide (SP), latency associated peptide (LAP) and mature peptide (MP). After the synthesis, SP and LAP are processed by enzymatic cleavage, where the C-terminal mature domain is released and secreted. BMPs bind to two-types of BMP receptors and signals through Smad-dependent (canonical) and Smad-independent (non-canonical) pathways. In the canonical pathway, BMP type I receptors phosphorylate receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads). Phosphorylated R-Smads form a complex compound with common-partner Smads (Co-Smads), translocate into the nucleus and regulate the transcription of osteogenic-related genes.

There are four phases in the process of bone fracture repair: i) inflammatory response, ii) endochondral formation (soft callus formation and osteoblast recruitment), iii) primary bone formation (hard callus formation and mineralization), and iv) secondary bone formation (remodeling). The bone healing process involves various associated factors including BMPs and TGF-β. The effect of BMPs in recombinant systems demonstrates their abilities to enhance fracture healing and skeletal defect repairs in a variety of animal models. Osteogenic potential of BMPs has allowed for their successful use as therapeutic agents for fracture healing, where enhancing bone regeneration has become general practice in spine fusion surgeries and fracture repair. The responsible genes and associated transcription factors for osteogenesis are also activated to express within a few hours of BMP treatment.

The FDA has approved the use of recombinant human BMPs (rhBMPs) including BMP2. However, rhBMPs have rapid systemic clearance and short biological half-life (7 to 16 minutes systemically and up to 8 days locally) and possible negative side-effects (ex. cancer risk) due to high dosage of BMP.

REFERENCES

-   1. Soltanoff C S, Yang S, Chen W, Li Y P. Signaling networks that     control the lineage commitment and differentiation of bone cells.     Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2009; 19(1):1-46. -   2. Kawabata M, Imamura T, Miyazono K. Signal transduction by bone     morphogenetic proteins. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 1998; 9(1):49-61. -   3. Carreira A C, Alves G G, Zambuzzi W F, Sogayar M C, Granjeiro     J M. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins: structure, biological function and     therapeutic applications. Arch Biochem Biophys 2014; 561:64-73. -   4. Ten Dijke P, Fu J, Schaap P, Roelen B A. Signal transduction of     bone morphogenetic proteins in osteoblast differentiation. J Bone     Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A Suppl 3:34-8. -   5. Canalis E, Economides A N, Gazzerro E. Bone morphogenetic     proteins, their antagonists, and the skeleton. Endocr Rev 2003;     24(2):218-35. -   6. Huang Z, Ren P G, Ma T, Smith R L, Goodman S B. Modulating     osteogenesis of mesenchymal. -   7. Noel D, Gazit D, Bouquet C, Apparailly F, Bony C, Plence P, et     al. Short-term BMP-2 expression is sufficient for in vivo     osteochondral differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells     2004; 22(1):74-85. -   8. Shen B, Wei A, Whittaker S, Williams L A, Tao H, Ma D D, et al.     The role of BMP-7 in chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of     human bone marrow multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro. J     Cell Biochem 2010; 109(2):406-16. -   9. Weiskirchen R, Meurer S K. BMP-7 counteracting TGF-beta1     activities in organ fibrosis. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2013;     18:1407-34. -   10. Kudo T A, Kanetaka H, Watanabe A, Okumoto A, Asano M, Zhang Y,     et al.

Investigating bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling in a newly established human cell line expressing BMP receptor type II. Tohoku J Exp Med 2010; 222(2):121-9.

-   11. Liu H, Zhang R, Chen D, Oyajobi B O, Zhao M. Functional     redundancy of type II BMP receptor and type IIB activin receptor in     BMP2-induced osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Physiol 2012;     227(3):952-63. -   12. Zhang X, Schwarz E M, Young D A, Puzas J E, Rosier R N, O'Keefe     R J. Cyclooxygenase-2 regulates mesenchymal cell differentiation     into the osteoblast lineage and is critically involved in bone     repair. J Clin Invest 2002; 109(11):1405-15. -   13. van der Kraan P M, de Vries B J, Vitters E L, van den Berg W B,     van de Putte L B. The effect of low sulfate concentrations on the     glycosaminoglycan synthesis in anatomically intact articular     cartilage of the mouse. J Orthop Res 1989; 7(5):645-53. -   14. Hunziker E B, Schenk R K, Cruz-Drive L M. Quantitation of     chondrocyte performance in growth-plate cartilage during     longitudinal bone growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69(2):162-73. -   15. Urist M R. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;     150(3698):893-9. -   16. Khattab H M, Ono M, Sonoyama W, Oida Y, Shinkawa S, Yoshioka Y,     et al. The BMP2 antagonist inhibitor L51P enhances the osteogenic     potential of BMP2 by simultaneous and delayed synergism. Bone 2014;     69:165-73. -   17. Shim J H, Greenblatt M B, Singh A, Brady N, Hu D, Drapp R, et     al. Administration of BMP2/7 in utero partially reverses     Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome-like skeletal defects induced by Pdk1 or     Cbp mutations in mice. J Clin Invest 2012; 122(1):91-106. -   18. Yasko A W, Lane J M, Fellinger E J, Rosen V, Wozney J M, Wang     E A. The healing of segmental bone defects, induced by recombinant     human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). A radiographic,     histological, and biomechanical study in rats. J Bone Joint Surg Am     1992; 74(5):659-70. -   19. Einhorn T A, Majeska R J, Mohaideen A, Kagel E M, Bouxsein M L,     Turek T J, et al. A single percutaneous injection of recombinant     human bone morphogenetic protein-2 accelerates fracture repair. J     Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A(8):1425-35. -   20. Nakase T, Nomura S, Yoshikawa H, Hashimoto J, Hirota S, Kitamura     Y, et al. Transient and localized expression of bone morphogenetic     protein 4 messenger RNA during fracture healing. J Bone Miner Res     1994; 9(5):651-9. -   21. Balint E, Lapointe D, Drissi H, van der Meijden C, Young D W,     van Wijnen A J, et al. Phenotype discovery by gene expression     profiling: mapping of biological processes linked to BMP-2-mediated     osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Biochem 2003; 89(2):401-26. -   22. Nakashima K, Thou X, Kunkel G, Zhang Z, Deng J M, Behringer R R,     et al. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix     is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell     2002; 108(1):17-29. -   23. Wegman F, Bijenhof A, Schuijff L, Oner F C, Dhert W J, Alblas J.     Osteogenic differentiation as a result of BMP-2 plasmid DNA based     gene therapy in vitro and in vivo. European cells & materials 2011;     21:230-42; discussion 42. -   24. Fischer P M. Cellular uptake mechanisms and potential     therapeutic utility of peptidic cell delivery vectors: progress     2001-2006. Med Res Rev 2007; 27:755-95. -   25. Heitz F, Morris M C, Divita G. Twenty years of cell-penetrating     peptides: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics. Br J Pharmacol     2009; 157:195-206. -   26. Lapenna S, Giordano A. Cell cycle kinases as therapeutic targets     for cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2009; 8:547-66. -   27. Lim J, Kim J, Duong T, Lee G, Kim J, Yoon J. et al. Antitumor     activity of cell-permeable p18(INK4c) with enhanced membrane and     tissue penetration. Mol Ther 2012; 20:1540-9. -   28. Jo D, Liu D, Yao S, Collins R D, Hawiger J. Intracellular     protein therapy with SOCS3 inhibits inflammation and apoptosis. Nat     Med 2005; 11:892-8. -   29. Jo D, Nashabi A, Doxsee C, Lin Q, Unutmaz D, Chen J. et al.     Epigenetic regulation of gene structure and function with a     cell-permeable Cre recombinase. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19:929-33. -   30. Liu D, Li C, Chen Y, Burnett C, Liu X Y, Downs S. et al. Nuclear     import of proinflammatory transcription factors is required for     massive liver apoptosis induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide J     Biol Chem. 2004; 279:48434-42. -   31. Liu D, Liu X Y, Robinson D, Burnett C, Jackson C, Seele L. et     al. Suppression of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B-induced Toxicity by     a Nuclear Import Inhibitor. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:19239-46. -   32. Liu D, Zienkiewicz J, DiGiandomenico A, Hawiger J., Suppression     of acute lung inflammation by intracellular peptide delivery of a     nuclear import inhibitor. Mol Ther 2009; 17: 796-802. -   33. Moore D J, Zienkiewicz J, Kendall P L, Liu D, Liu X, Veach R A.     et al. In vivo islet protection by a nuclear import inhibitor in a     mouse model of type 1 diabetes. PLoS One 2010; 5:e13235. -   34. Lim J, Jang G, Kang S, Lee G, Nga do TT, Phuong do TL. et al.     Cell-permeable NM23 blocks the maintenance and progression of     established pulmonary metastasis. Cancer Res 2011; 71:7216-25. -   35. Duong T, Kim J, Ruley H E, Jo D. Cell-permeable parkin proteins     suppress Parkinson disease-associated phenotypes in cultured cells     and animals. PLoS One 2014; 9:e102517. -   36. Lim J, Duong T, Do N, Do P, Kim J, Kim H. et al. Antitumor     activity of cell-permeable RUNX3 protein in gastric cancer cells.     Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19:680-90. -   37. Lim J, Duong T, Lee G, Seong B L, El-Rifai W, Ruley H E et al.     The effect of intracellular protein delivery on the anti-tumor     activity of recombinant human endostatin. Biomaterials 2013;     34:6261-71. -   38. Lim J, Kim J, Kang J, Jo D. Partial somatic to stem cell     transformations induced by cell-permeable reprogramming factors,     Scientific Reports 2014; 4:4361.

DISCLOSURE Technical Problem

Macromolecule, such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), cannot be translocated across the cell membrane. Therefore, there was a need to develop macromolecule intracellular transduction technology (MITT), which enables the translocation of macromolecules into the cell/tissues.

In the previous studies, MITT-based hydrophobic CPPs named membrane translocating sequence (MTS) and membrane translocating motif (MTM), derived from the hydrophobic signal peptide of fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF4) have been reported and used to deliver biologically active peptides and proteins, such as BMP, systemically in animals.

However, they could not effectively deliver BMP in vivo and in vitro, and their delivery efficiency was in sufficient due to protein aggregation, low solubility/yield and poor cell-/tissue-permeability.

Technical Solution

To resolve these problems, newly designed advanced macromolecule transduction domain (aMTD)-enabled macromolecule intracellular transduction technology (MITT) has been adopted for the development of novel protein using BMP against bone formation and regeneration.

For MITT, six critical factors (length, bending potential, instability index, aliphatic index, GRAVY, amino acid composition) have been determined through analysis of baseline hydrophobic CPPs. Advanced macromolecule transduction domain (aMTD), newly designed based on these six critical factors, could optimize cell-/tissue-permeability of cargo proteins that have a therapeutic effects and develop them as protein-based drugs. Further, in order to increase solubility and yield of recombinant protein, solubilization domains (SDs) additionally fused to the aMTD-cargo recombinant protein, thereby notably increased the solubility and yield of the recombinant protein.

One embodiment of the present invention provides a cell-permeable bone morphogenetic protein (CP-BMP), which comprises a BMP being one of BMP2 and BMP7 and an advanced macromolecule transduction domain (aMTD) being composed of 9 to 13 amino acid sequences and having improved cell or tissue permeability, wherein the aMTD is fused to one end or both ends of the BMP and has the following features of:

(a) being composed of 3 or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of Ala, Val, Ile, Leu, and Pro;

(b) having proline as amino acids corresponding to any one or more of positions 5 to 8, and 12 of its amino acid sequence; and

(c) having an instability index of 40 to 60; an aliphatic index of 180 to 220; and a grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) of 2.1 to 2.6, as measured by Protparam.

According to one embodiment, one or more solubilization domain (SD)(s) are further fused to the end(s) of one or more of the BMP and the aMTD.

According to another embodiment, the aMTD may have α-Helix structure.

According to still another embodiment, the aMTD may be composed of 12 amino acid sequences and represented by the following general formula:

wherein X(s) refers to Alanine (A), Valine (V), Leucine (L) or Isoleucine (I); one of U refers to proline and the other U(s) refer to A, V, L or I; and P refers to proline.

Another embodiment of the present invention provides a CP-BMP recombinant protein which is represented by any one of the following structural formula:

A-B-C, A-C-B, B-A-C, B-C-A, C-A-B, C-B-A and A-C-B-C wherein A is an advanced macromolecule transduction domain (aMTD) having improved cell or tissue permeability, B is a BMP having one of BMP2 and BMP7, and C is a solubilization domain (SD); and

the aMTD is composed of 9 to 13 amino acid sequences and has the following features of:

(a) being composed of 3 or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of Ala, Val, Ile, Leu, and Pro;

(b) having proline as amino acids corresponding to any one or more of positions 5 to 8, and 12 of its amino acid sequence;

(c) having an instability index of 40 to 60; an aliphatic index of 180 to 220; and a grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) of 2.1 to 2.6, as measured by Protparam; and

(d) having α-Helix structure.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, the BMP may have an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 815 to 818.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, the BMP may be encoded by a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 819 to 823.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the BMP may further include a ligand selectively binding to a receptor of a cell, a tissue, or an organ.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the aMTD may have an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 240.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the aMTD may be encoded by a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 241 to 481.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the SD(s), independently, may have an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 799 to 805.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the SD(s), independently, may be encoded by a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 806 to 812.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the BMP recombinant protein may have a histidine-tag affinity domain additionally fused to one end thereof.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the histidine-tag affinity domain may have an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 813.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the histidine-tag affinity domain may be encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 814.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the fusion may be formed via a peptide bond or a chemical bond.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the CP-BMP recombinant protein may be used for the regeneration of defected bone.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a polynucleotide sequence encoding the CP-BMP recombinant protein.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, the polynucleotide sequence may be selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 824 and 825.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, the polynucleotide sequence may be selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 826 and 827.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a recombinant expression vector including the polynucleotide sequence.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a transformant transformed with the recombinant expression vector.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a preparing method of the CP-BMP recombinant protein including preparing the recombinant expression vector; preparing the transformant using the recombinant expression vector; culturing the transformant; and recovering the recombinant protein expressed by the culturing.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a composition including the CP-BMP recombinant protein as an active ingredient.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition for regenerating of defected bone including the CP-BMP recombinant protein as an active ingredient; and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides use of the CP-BMP recombinant protein as a medicament for regenerating of defected bone.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a medicament including the CP-BMP recombinant protein.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides use of the CP-BMP recombinant protein in the preparation of a medicament for regenerating of defected bone.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a method of regenerating of defected bone, the method including preparing defected bone; and treating the defected bone with an therapeutically effective amount of the CP-BMP recombinant protein.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, the subject may be a mammal.

Unless defined otherwise, all terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention belongs. Although a certain method and a material is described herein, it should not be construed as being limited thereto, any similar or equivalent method and material to those may also be used in the practice or testing of the present invention. All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited. It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

A “peptide” refers to a chain-type polymer formed by amino acid residues which are linked to each other via peptide bonds, and used interchangeably with “polypeptide.” Further, a “polypeptide” includes a peptide and a protein.

Further, the term “peptide” includes amino acid sequences that are conservative variations of those peptides specifically exemplified herein. The term “conservative variation,” as used herein, denotes the replacement of an amino acid residue by another, biologically similar residue. Examples of conservative variations include substitution of one hydrophobic residue, such as isoleucine, valine, leucine, alanine, cysteine, glycine, phenylalanine, proline, tryptophan, tyrosine, norleucine, or methionine for another, or substitution of one polar residue for another, for example, substitution of arginine for lysine, glutamic acid for aspartic acid, or glutamine for asparagine, and the like. Neutral hydrophilic amino acids which may be substituted for one another include asparagine, glutamine, serine, and threonine.

The term “conservative variation” also includes use of a substituted amino acid in place of an unsubstituted parent amino acid, provided that antibodies raised to the substituted polypeptide also immunoreacts with the unsubstituted polypeptide. Such conservative substitutions are within the definition of the classes of the peptides according to one embodiment of the present invention.

A person having ordinary skill in the art may make similar substitutions to obtain peptides having higher cell permeability and a broader host range. For example, one embodiment of the present invention provides peptides corresponding to amino acid sequences (e.g. SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 240) provided herein, as well as analogues, homologs, isomers, derivatives, amidated variations, and conservative variations thereof, as long as the cell permeability of the peptide remains.

Minor modifications to primary amino acid sequence of the peptides according to one embodiment of the present invention may result in peptides which have substantially equivalent or enhanced cell permeability, as compared to the specific peptides described herein. Such modifications may be deliberate, as by site-directed mutagenesis, or may be spontaneous.

All peptides may be synthesized using L-amino acids, but D forms of all of the peptides may be synthetically produced. In addition, C-terminal derivatives, such as C-terminal methyl esters and C-terminal amidates, may be produced in order to increase the cell permeability of the peptide according to one embodiment of the present invention.

All of the peptides produced by these modifications are included herein, as long as in the case of amidated versions of the peptide, the cell permeability of the original peptide is altered or enhanced such that the amidated peptide is therapeutically useful. It is envisioned that such modifications are useful for altering or enhancing cell permeability of a particular peptide.

Furthermore, deletion of one or more amino acids may also result in a modification to the structure of the resultant molecule without any significant change in its cell permeability. This may lead to the development of a smaller active molecule which may also have utility. For example, amino- or carboxyl-terminal amino acids which may not be required for the cell permeability of a particular peptide may be removed.

The term “gene” refers to an arbitrary nucleic acid sequence or a part thereof having a functional role in protein coding or transcription, or regulation of other gene expression. The gene may be composed of all nucleic acids encoding a functional protein or a part of the nucleic acid encoding or expressing the protein. The nucleic acid sequence may include a gene mutation in exon, intron, initiation or termination region, promoter sequence, other regulatory sequence, or a unique sequence adjacent to the gene.

The term “primer” refers to an oligonucleotide sequence that hybridizes to a complementary RNA or DNA target polynucleotide and serves as the starting points for the stepwise synthesis of a polynucleotide from mononucleotides by the action of a nucleotidyltransferase as occurs, for example, in a polymerase chain reaction.

The term “coding region” or “coding sequence” refers to a nucleic acid sequence, a complement thereof, or a part thereof which encodes a particular gene product or a fragment thereof for which expression is desired, according to the normal base pairing and codon usage relationships. Coding sequences include exons in genomic DNA or immature primary RNA transcripts, which are joined together by the cellular biochemical machinery to provide a mature mRNA. The anti-sense strand is the complement of the nucleic acid, and the coding sequence may be deduced therefrom.

One embodiment of the present invention provides a CP-BMP recombinant protein, which comprises a BMP being one of BMP2 and BMP7, and an advanced macromolecule transduction domain (aMTD) being composed of 9 to 13 amino acid sequences, preferably 10 to 12 amino acid sequences, and having improved cell or tissue permeability, wherein the aMTD is fused to one end or both ends of the BMP and has the following features of:

(a) being preferably composed of 3 or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of Ala, Val, Ile, Leu, and Pro;

(b) having proline as amino acid sequences corresponding to any one or more of positions 5 to 8, and 12 of its amino acids, and preferably one or more of positions 5 to 8 and position 12 of its amino acid sequence; and

(c) having an instability index of preferably 40 to 60 and more preferably 41 to 58; an aliphatic index of preferably 180 to 220 and more preferably 185 to 225; and a grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) of preferably 2.1 to 2.6 and more preferably 2.2 to 2.6 as measured by Protparam (see web.expasy.org/protparam/).

According to one embodiment, one or more solubilization domain (SD)(s) are further fused to one or more of the BMP and the aMTD, preferably one end or both ends of the BMP, and more preferably the C-terminus of the BMP.

According to another embodiment, the aMTD may have α-Helix structure.

According to still another embodiment, the aMTD may be preferably composed of 12 amino acid sequences and represented by the following general formula:

wherein X(s) refers to Alanine (A), Valine (V), Leucine (L) or Isoleucine (I); one of U refers to proline and the other U(s) refer to A, V, L or I; and P refers to proline.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a CP-BMP recombinant protein which is represented by any one of structural formula A-B-C, A-C-B, B-A-C, B-C-A, C-A-B, C-B-A and A-C-B-C, and preferably by A-B-C or A-C-B-C:

wherein A is an advanced macromolecule transduction domain (aMTD) having improved cell or tissue permeability, B is a BMP having one of BMP2 and BMP7, and C is a solubilization domain (SD); and the aMTD is composed of 9 to 13, preferably 10 to 12 amino acid sequences and has the following features of:

(a) being composed of 3 or more amino acids selected from the group consisting of Ala,

Val, Ile, Leu, and Pro;

(b) having proline as amino acids corresponding to any one or more of positions 5 to 8, and 12 of its amino acid sequence, and preferably, one or more of positions 5 to 8 and position 12 of its amino acid sequence;

(c) having an instability index of preferably 40 to 60 and more preferably 41 to 58; an aliphatic index of preferably 180 to 220 and more preferably 185 to 225; and a grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) of preferably 2.1 to 2.6 and more preferably 2.2 to 2.6, as measured by Protparam (see web.expasy.org/protparam/); and

(d) preferably having α-Helix structure.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the BMP may have an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 815 to 818. The BMP may have one selected from the group consisting of BMP2 (M form), BMP2 (L form), BMP7 (M form) and BMP7 (L form). The BMP may be preferably BMP2 (M form) of SEQ ID NO: 815 or a BMP7 (M form) of SEQ ID NO: 817.

In another embodiment of the present invention, the BMP may be encoded by a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 819 to 823. The BMP may be preferably BMP2 (M form) encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 819, BMP2 (M form) for codon-optimization encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 820 or BMP7 (M form) encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 822. The BMP may be more preferably BMP2 (M form) encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 819 or BMP2 (M form) for codon-optimization encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 820.

When the CP-BMP recombinant protein is intended to be delivered to a particular cell, tissue, or organ, the BMP may form a fusion product, together with an extracellular domain of a ligand capable of selectively binding to a receptor which is specifically expressed on the particular cell, tissue, or organ, or monoclonal antibody (mAb) capable of specifically binding to the receptor or the ligand and a modified form thereof.

The binding of the peptide and a biologically active substance may be formed either by indirect linkage by a cloning technique using an expression vector at a nucleotide level or by direct linkage via chemical or physical covalent or non-covalent bond of the peptide and the biologically active substance.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the BMP may preferably further include a ligand selectively binding to a receptor of a cell, a tissue, or an organ.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the aMTD may have an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 240. The aMTD may be preferably aMTD₁ of SEQ ID NO: 1, aMTD₃ of SEQ ID NO: 3, aMTD₂₄ of SEQ ID NO: 12, aMTD₆₁ of SEQ ID NO: 17, aMTD₁₂₃ of SEQ ID NO: 33, aMTD₁₂₄ of SEQ ID NO: 34, aMTD₂₄₁ of SEQ ID NO: 56, aMTD₃₂₁ of SEQ ID NO: 74, aMTD₃₈₅ of SEQ ID NO: 91, aMTD₄₀₃ of SEQ ID NO: 94, aMTD₄₄₂ of SEQ ID NO: 101, aMTD₄₈₁ of SEQ ID NO: 110, aMTD₅₆₃ of SEQ ID NO: 131, aMTD₅₈₅ of SEQ ID NO: 136, aMTD₆₀₃ of SEQ ID NO: 139, aMTD₆₂₃ of SEQ ID NO: 143, aMTD₈₄₇ of SEQ ID NO: 200 and aMTD₈₉₇ of SEQ ID NO: 228 and aMTD₈₉₉ of SEQ ID NO: 229, and more preferably aMTD₂₄ of SEQ ID NO: 12 and aMTD₄₄₂ of SEQ ID NO: 101.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the aMTD may be encoded by a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 241 to 481. The aMTD may be preferably aMTD₁ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 241, aMTD₃ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 243, aMTD₂₄ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 252, aMTD₆₁ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 257, aMTD₁₂₃ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 273, aMTD₁₂₄ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 274, aMTD₂₄₁ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 296, aMTD₃₂₁ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 314, aMTD₃₈₅ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 331, aMTD₄₀₃ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 334, aMTD₄₄₂ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 341, aMTD₄₄₂ for codon-optimization encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 481, aMTD₄₈₁ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 350, aMTD₅₆₃ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 371, aMTD₅₈₅ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 376, aMTD₆₀₃ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 379, aMTD₆₂₃ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 383, aMTD₈₄₇ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 440, aMTD₈₉₇ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 468 and aMTD₈₉₉ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 469, and more preferably aMTD₂₄ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 252, aMTD₄₄₂ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 341 and aMTD₄₄₂ for codon-optimization encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 481.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the SD(s) may have an amino acid sequence independently selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 799 to 805. The SD(s) may has one or more selected from the group consisting of SDA, SDB, SDB′ (SDB for deimmunization), SDC, SDD, SDE and SDF. The SD may be preferably SDA of SEQ ID NO: 799, SDB of SEQ ID NO: 800, SDB′ of SEQ ID NO: 805 or SDC of SEQ ID NO: 801, and more preferably, SDB of SEQ ID NO: 800 and SDB′ of SEQ ID NO: 805 which have superior structural stability.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the SDs may be encoded by a polynucleotide sequence independently selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 806 to 812. The SD may be preferably SDA encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 806, SDB encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 807, SDB′ encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 812, or SDC encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 808, and more preferably, SDB and SDB′ having superior structural stability, which is encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 807 and SEQ ID NO: 812.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the CP-BMP recombinant protein may be preferably selected from the group consisting of:

1) a recombinant protein, in which BMP protein having an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 815 and 818 is fused to the N-terminus or the C-terminus of aMTD having any one amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 240, preferably SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 12, 17, 33, 34, 56, 74, 91, 94, 101, 110, 131, 136, 139, 143, 200, 228 and 229 and more preferably SEQ ID NO: 12 and 101;

2) a recombinant protein, in which SD having any one amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 799 to 805, preferably SEQ ID NOs: 799, 800, 801 and 805, and more preferably SEQ ID NO: 800 and 805 is further fused to the N-terminus or the C-terminus of the BMP protein in the recombinant protein of 1); and

3) a recombinant protein, in which one or more of a histidine tag having an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 813 is further fused to the N-terminus or the C-terminus of the aMTD in the recombinant protein of 1) or 2).

The BMPs may exhibit a physiological phenomenon-related activity or a therapeutic purpose-related activity by intracellular or in vivo delivery. The recombinant expression vector may include a tag sequence which makes it easy to purify the recombinant protein, for example, consecutive histidine codon, maltose binding protein codon, Myc codon, etc., and further include a fusion partner to enhance solubility of the recombinant protein, etc. Further, for the overall structural and functional stability of the recombinant protein or flexibility of the proteins encoded by respective genes, the recombinant expression vector may further include one or more glycine, proline, and spacer amino acid or polynucleotide sequences including AAY amino acids. Furthermore, the recombinant expression vector may include a sequence specifically digested by an enzyme in order to remove an unnecessary region of the recombinant protein, an expression regulatory sequence, and a marker or reporter gene sequence to verify intracellular delivery, but is not limited thereto.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the CP-BMP recombinant protein may have a histidine-tag affinity domain additionally fused to one end thereof. Preferably, the histidine-tag may be fused to the N-terminus of BMP, aMTD or SD. More preferably, the histidine-tag may be fused to the N-terminus of aMTD or BMP.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the histidine-tag affinity domain may have an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 813.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the histidine-tag affinity domain may be encoded by a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 814.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the fusion may be formed via a peptide bond or a chemical bond.

The chemical bond may be preferably selected from the group consisting of disulfide bonds, diamine bonds, sulfide-amine bonds, carboxyl-amine bonds, ester bonds, and covalent bonds.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the CP-BMP recombinant protein may be used for the regeneration of defected bone. The CP-BMP recombinant protein may act on tissues or bone defected by osteogenesis imperfecta, osteoporosis, fracture and osteotomy to efficiently help cell differentiation, leading to bone regeneration or formation.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a polynucleotide sequence encoding the CP-BMP recombinant protein.

The polynucleotide sequence may be present in a vector in which the polynucleotide sequence is operably linked to regulatory sequences capable of providing for the expression of the polynucleotide sequence by a suitable host cell.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, the polynucleotide sequence may be selected from the following groups:

1) a polynucleotide sequence, in which any one polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 241 to 481, preferably SEQ ID NOs: 241, 243, 252, 257, 273, 481, 274, 296, 314, 331, 334, 341, 350, 371, 375, 379, 383, 440, 468, 469 and 481, and more preferably SEQ ID NOs: 12 and 341, is operably linked with and a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 815 to 818; and

2) a polynucleotide sequence, in which any one polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 806 to 812, preferably SEQ ID NOs: 806, 807, 808 and 812, and more preferably SEQ ID NOs: 807 and 812 is further operably linked to the polynucleotide sequence of 1).

Within the expression vector, the term “operably linked” is intended to mean that the polynucleotide sequence of interest is linked to the regulatory sequence(s) in a manner which allows for expression of the polynucleotide sequence. The term “regulatory sequence” is intended to include promoters, enhancers, and other expression control elements. Such operable linkage with the expression vector can be achieved by conventional gene recombination techniques known in the art, while site-directed DNA cleavage and linkage are carried out by using conventional enzymes known in the art.

The expression vectors may contain a signal sequence or a leader sequence for membrane targeting or secretion, as well as regulatory sequences such as a promoter, an operator, an initiation codon, a termination codon, a polyadenylation signal, an enhancer and the like. The promoter may be a constitutive or an inducible promoter. Further, the expression vector may include one or more selectable marker genes for selecting the host cell containing the expression vector, and may further include a polynucleotide sequence that enables the vector to replicate in the host cell in question.

The expression vector constructed according to the present invention may be the vector where the polynucleotide encoding the CP-BMP recombinant protein (where an aMTD is fused to the N-terminus or C-terminus of a BMP protein) is inserted within the multiple cloning sites (MC S), preferably NdeI/SalI, NdeI/BamHI, NdeI/NotI and NdeI/HindIII site of a pET-22b(+) vector, a pET-26b(+) vector or a pET-28a(+) vector (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany).

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the polynucleotide encoding the SD being additionally fused to the N-terminus or C-terminus of a BMP protein may be inserted into a cleavage site of restriction enzyme (NdeI, EcoRI, Salt, XhoI, NotI, HindIII, etc.) within the multiple cloning sites (MCS) of a pET-22b(+) vector, a pET-26b(+) vector or a pET-28a(+) vector.

In still another embodiment of the present invention, the polynucleotide is cloned into a pET-22b(+) vector, a pET-26b(+) vector or a pET-28a(+) vector bearing a His-tag sequence so as to fuse six histidine residues to the N-terminus of the CP-BMP recombinant protein to allow easy purification.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, the polynucleotide sequence may be represented by a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 824 and 825.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, the polynucleotide sequence may be further fused with SD, and may be represented by a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 826 and 827.

According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the polynucleotide sequence may be fused with a histidine-tag affinity domain, and may be a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 828 and 832.

Preferably, the CP-BMP recombinant protein of another embodiment of the present invention may be composed of an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 824, 826 and 828.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a recombinant expression vector including the polynucleotide sequence.

Preferably, the vector may be inserted in a host cell and recombined with the host cell genome, or refers to any nucleic acid including a nucleotide sequence competent to replicate spontaneously as an episome. Such a vector may include a linear nucleic acid, a plasmid, a phagemid, a cosmid, an RNA vector, a viral vector, etc.

Preferably, the vector may be genetically engineered to incorporate the nucleic acid sequence encoding the recombinant protein in an orientation either N-terminal and/or C-terminal to a nucleic acid sequence encoding a peptide, a polypeptide, a protein domain, or a full-length protein of interest, and in the correct reading frame so that the recombinant protein consisting of aMTD, BMP, and preferably SD may be expressed. Expression vectors may be selected from those readily available for use in prokaryotic or eukaryotic expression systems. Preferably, a pET-22b(+) vector, a pET-26b(+) vector or a pET-28a(+) vector may be used.

Standard recombinant nucleic acid methods may be used to express a genetically engineered recombinant protein. The nucleic acid sequence encoding the recombinant protein according to one embodiment of the present invention may be cloned into a nucleic acid expression vector, e.g., with appropriate signal and processing sequences and regulatory sequences for transcription and translation, and the protein may be synthesized using automated organic synthetic methods. Synthetic methods of producing proteins are described in, for example, the literature [Methods in Enzymology, Volume 289: Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis by Gregg B. Fields (Editor), Sidney P. Colowick, Melvin I. Simon (Editor), Academic Press (1997)].

In order to obtain high level expression of a cloned gene or nucleic acid, for example, a cDNA encoding the recombinant protein of the present invention, the recombinant protein sequence may be typically subcloned into an expression vector that includes a strong promoter for directing transcription, a transcription/translation terminator, and in the case of a nucleic acid encoding a protein, a ribosome binding site for translational initiation. Suitable bacterial promoters are well known in the art and are described, e.g., in the literatures [Sambrook & Russell, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3d Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, N.Y. (2001); and Ausube, et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, N. Y. (1989)]. Bacterial expression systems for expression of the recombinant protein of the present invention are available in, e.g., E. coli, Bacillus sp., and Salmonella (Palva et al., Gene 22: 229-235 (1983); Mosbach et al., Nature 302: 543-545 (1983)). Kits for such expression systems are commercially available. Eukaryotic expression systems for mammalian cells, yeast, and insect cells are well known in the art and are also commercially available. The eukaryotic expression vector may be preferably an adenoviral vector, an adeno-associated vector, or a retroviral vector.

Generally, the expression vector for expressing the cell permeable recombinant protein according to one embodiment of the present invention in which the cargo protein, i.e. BMP, is attached to the N-terminus, C-terminus, or both termini of aMTD may include regulatory sequences including, for example, a promoter, operably attached to a sequence encoding the advanced macromolecule transduction domain. Non-limiting examples of inducible promoters that may be used include steroid-hormone responsive promoters (e.g., ecdysone-responsive, estrogen-responsive, and glutacorticoid-responsive promoters), tetracycline “Tet-On” and “Tet-Off” systems, and metal-responsive promoters.

The recombinant protein may be introduced into an appropriate host cell, e.g., a bacterial cell, a yeast cell, an insect cell, or a tissue culture cell. The recombinant protein may also be introduced into embryonic stem cells in order to generate a transgenic organism. Large numbers of suitable vectors and promoters are known to those skilled in the art and are commercially available for generating the recombinant protein of the present invention.

Known methods may be used to construct vectors including the polynucleotide sequence according to one embodiment of the present invention and appropriate transcriptional/translational control signals. These methods include in vitro recombinant DNA techniques, synthetic techniques, and in vivo recombination/genetic recombination. For example, these techniques are described in the literatures [Sambrook & Russell, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3d Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, N. Y. (2001); and Ausubel et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, N.Y. (1989)].

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a transformant transformed with the recombinant expression vector.

The transformation includes transfection, and refers to a process whereby a foreign (extracellular) DNA, with or without an accompanying material, enters into a host cell. The “transfected cell” refers to a cell into which the foreign DNA is introduced into the cell, and thus the cell harbors the foreign DNA. The DNA may be introduced into the cell so that a nucleic acid thereof may be integrated into the chromosome or replicable as an extrachromosomal element. The cell introduced with the foreign DNA, etc. is called a transformant.

As used herein, ‘introducing’ of a protein, a peptide, an organic compound into a cell may be used interchangeably with the expression of ‘carrying,’ ‘penetrating,’ ‘transporting,’ ‘delivering,’ ‘permeating’ or ‘passing.’

It is understood that the host cell refers to a eukaryotic or prokaryotic cell into which one or more DNAs or vectors are introduced, and refers not only to the particular subject cell but also to the progeny or potential progeny thereof. Because certain modifications may occur in succeeding generations due to either mutation or environmental influences, such progeny may not, in fact, be identical to the parent cell, but are still included within the scope of the term as used herein.

The host cells may be preferably bacterial cells, and as the bacterial cells, there are, in principle, no limitations. They may be eubacteria (gram-positive or gram-negative) or archaebacteria, as long as they allow genetic manipulation for insertion of a gene of interest, preferably for site-specific integration, and they may be cultured on a manufacturing scale. Preferably, the host cells may have the property to allow cultivation to high cell densities.

Examples of bacterial host cells that may be used in the preparation of the recombinant protein are E. coli (Lee, 1996; Hannig and Makrides, 1998), Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescens (Squires et al., 2004; Retallack et al., 2006) as well as various Corynebacterium (US 2006/0003404 A1) and Lactococcus lactis (Mierau et al., 2005) strains. Preferably, the host cells are Escherichia coli cells.

More preferably, the host cell may include an RNA polymerase capable of binding to a promoter regulating the gene of interest. The RNA polymerase may be endogenous or exogenous to the host cell.

Preferably, host cells with a foreign strong RNA polymerase may be used. For example, Escherichia coli strains engineered to carry a foreign RNA polymerase (e.g. like in the case of using a T7 promoter a T7-like RNA polymerase in the so-called “T7 strains”) integrated in their genome may be used. Examples of T7 strains, e.g. BL21(DE3), HMS174(DE3), and their derivatives or relatives (see Novagen, pET System manual, 11^(th) edition), may be widely used and commercially available. Preferably, BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL or BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)-RIPL (Agilent Technologies) may be used. These strains are DE3 lysogens containing the T7 RNA polymerase gene under control of the lacUV5 promoter. Induction with IPTG allows production of T7 RNA polymerase which then directs the expression of the gene of interest under the control of the T7 promoter.

The host cell strains, E. coli BL21(DE3) or HMS174(DE3), which have received their genome-based T7 RNA polymerase via the phage DE3, are lysogenic. It is preferred that the T7 RNA polymerase contained in the host cell has been integrated by a method which avoids, or preferably excludes, the insertion of residual phage sequences in the host cell genome since lysogenic strains have the disadvantage to potentially exhibit lytic properties, leading to undesirable phage release and cell lysis.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a preparing method of the CP-BMP recombinant protein including preparing the recombinant expression vector; preparing the transformant using the recombinant expression vector; culturing the transformant; and recovering the recombinant protein expressed by culturing.

Culturing may be preferably in a mode that employs the addition of a feed medium, this mode being selected from the fed-batch mode, semi-continuous mode, or continuous mode, and the bacterial expression host cells may include a DNA construct, integrated in their genome, carrying the DNA sequence encoding the protein of interest under the control of a promoter that enables expression of said protein.

There are no limitations in the type of the culture medium. The culture medium may be semi-defined, i.e. containing complex media compounds (e.g. yeast extract, soy peptone, casamino acids), or it may be chemically defined, without any complex compounds. Preferably, a defined medium may be used. The defined media (also called minimal or synthetic media) are exclusively composed of chemically defined substances, i.e. carbon sources such as glucose or glycerol, salts, vitamins, and, in view of a possible strain auxotrophy, specific amino acids or other substances such as thiamine. Most preferably, glucose may be used as a carbon source. Usually, the carbon source of the feed medium serves as the growth-limiting component which controls the specific growth rate.

Host cells may be disrupted by any convenient method, including freeze-thaw cycling, sonication, mechanical disruption, or the use of cell lysing agents. The literature [Scopes, Protein Purification: Principles and Practice, New York: Springer-Verlag (1994)] describes a number of general methods for purifying recombinant (and non-recombinant) proteins. The methods may include, e.g., ion-exchange chromatography, size-exclusion chromatography, affinity chromatography, selective precipitation, dialysis, and hydrophobic interaction chromatography. These methods may be adapted to devise a purification strategy for the cell permeable recombinant protein. If the cell permeable recombinant protein includes a purification handle, such as an epitope tag or a metal chelating sequence, affinity chromatography may be used to easily purify the protein.

The amount of the protein produced may be evaluated by detecting the advanced macromolecule transduction domain directly (e.g., using Western analysis) or indirectly (e.g., by assaying materials derived from the cells for specific DNA binding activity, such as by electrophoretic mobility shift assay). Proteins may be detected prior to purification, during any stage of purification, or after purification. In some implementations, purification or complete purification may not be necessary.

The recombinant protein prepared by the method according to one embodiment of the present invention may be an improved cell/tissue-permeable recombinant BMP, and induces differentiation of osteoblasts to regenerate defected bones.

The cell permeable recombinant proteins prepared by the method according to one embodiment of the present invention may be preferably used for regeneration of defected bone, which osteogenesis imperfecta, osteoporosis, bone fracture and osteotomy.

The osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), also known as “brittle bone disease” or Lobstein syndrome, is a debilitating and rare congenital bone disease that affects about one in every 15,000 people. Though phenotypes vary among OI types, common symptoms include incomplete ossification of bones and teeth, reduced bone mass, brittle bones, and pathologic fractures. These common symptoms of OI are thought to be caused by gene mutations which result in deficiencies in Type-I collagen or other proteins involved in bone matrix deposition or homeostasis.

The osteoporosis is a disease in which bones become fragile and more likely to fracture. Usually the bone loses density, which measures the amount of calcium and minerals in the bone. Osteoporosis is the most common type of bone disease. Bone is living tissue. Existing bone is constantly being replaced by new bone. Osteoporosis occurs when the body fails to form enough new bone, when too much existing bone is reabsorbed by the body, or both.

The bone fracture is a medical condition in which there is a damage in the continuity of the bone. A bone fracture can be the result of high force impact or stress, or a minimal trauma injury as a result of certain medical conditions that weaken the bones, such as osteoporosis, bone cancer, or osteogenesis imperfecta, where the fracture is then properly termed a pathologic fracture.

The osteotomy is a surgical operation in which a bone is cut to shorten, lengthen, or change its alignment. In some osteotomies, the bone is cut and an implant is provided in the bone to change the alignment of the bone.

The CP-BMP recombinant proteins according to one embodiment of the present invention may be used to bone regeneration, which the bone including but not limited to a tibia, fibula, femur, pelvis, humerus, ulna, radius, metacarpal and metatarsal.

The cell permeable recombinant proteins may be delivered to the interior of the cell, eliminating the need to transfect or transform the cell with a recombinant vector. The cell permeable recombinant proteins according to one embodiment of the present invention may be used in vitro to investigate protein function or may be used to maintain cells in a desired state.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a composition including the CP-BMP recombinant protein as an active ingredient. The composition may include CP-BMP2, CP-BMP7 or both CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 as an active ingredient. Preferably, the composition may include CP-BMP 2 or CP-BMP7, and more preferably, both CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 for effective bone regeneration.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition for regenerating of defected bone including the CP-BMP recombinant protein as an active ingredient; and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

Preferably, the composition may be for injectable (e.g. intraperitoneal, intravenous, subcutaneous, and intra-arterial, etc.) and may include the active ingredient in an amount of 75 to 600 ug/defected site, preferably 75 to 300 ug/defected site, more preferably 75 to 150 ug/defected site.

In the treatment of adult humans, the range of 75 to 150 ug/defected site/day in single or divided dose, is especially preferred. However, it will be understood that the concentration of the CP-BMP recombinant protein actually administered will be determined by a physician, in the light of the relevant circumstances, including the condition to be treated, the chosen route of administration, the age, weight, and response of the individual patient, and the severity of the patient's symptoms, and therefore the above dosage ranges are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way. In some instances dosage levels below the lower limit of the aforesaid range may be more than adequate, while in other cases still larger doses may be employed without causing any harmful side effect, provided that such larger doses are first divided into several smaller doses for administration throughout the day.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides use of the CP-BMP recombinant protein as a medicament for regenerating of defected bone.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a medicament including the CP-BMP recombinant protein.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides use of the CP-BMP recombinant protein for the preparation of a medicament for regenerating of defected bone.

Still another embodiment of the present invention provides a method of regenerating of defected bone, preparing defected bone; and treating the defected bone with an therapeutically effective amount of the CP-BMP recombinant protein. According to the method, the CP-BMP recombinant protein may be administrated or treated to the site of defected bone, and can induces bone regeneration and formation.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the subject may be preferably a mammal.

The pharmaceutical composition according to one embodiment of the present invention may be prepared by using pharmaceutically suitable and physiologically acceptable additives, in addition to the active ingredient, and the additives may include excipients, disintegrants, sweeteners, binders, coating agents, blowing agents, lubricants, glidants, flavoring agents, etc.

For administration, the pharmaceutical composition may be preferably formulated by further including one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers in addition to the above-described active ingredient.

Dosage forms of the pharmaceutical composition may include granules, powders, tablets, coated tablets, capsules, suppositories, liquid formulations, syrups, juice, suspensions, emulsions, drops, injectable liquid formulations, etc. For formulation of the composition into a tablet or capsule, for example, the active ingredient may be combined with any oral, non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable inert carrier, such as ethanol, glycerol, water, etc. If desired or necessary, suitable binders, lubricants, disintegrants, and colorants may be additionally included as a mixture.

Examples of the suitable binder may include, but are not limited to, starch, gelatin, natural sugars such as glucose or beta-lactose, corn sweeteners, natural and synthetic gums such as acacia, tragacanth, or sodium oleate, sodium stearate, magnesium stearate, sodium benzoate, sodium acetate, sodium chloride, etc. Examples of the disintegrant may include, but are not limited to, starch, methyl cellulose, agar, bentonite, xanthan gum, etc. For formulation of the composition into a liquid preparation, a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier which is sterile and biocompatible may be used, such as saline, sterile water, a Ringer's solution, buffered saline, an albumin infusion solution, a dextrose solution, a maltodextrin solution, glycerol, and ethanol, and these materials may be used alone or in any combination thereof. If necessary, other common additives, such as antioxidants, buffers, bacteriostatic agents, etc., may be added. Further, diluents, dispersants, surfactants, binders, and lubricants may be additionally added to prepare injectable formulations such as aqueous solutions, suspensions, and emulsions, or pills, capsules, granules, or tablets. Furthermore, the composition may be preferably formulated, depending upon diseases and ingredients, using any appropriate method known in the art, as disclosed in Remington's Pharmaceutical Science, Mack Publishing Company, Easton Pa.

Preferably, the treatment or treating mean improving or stabilizing the subject's condition or disease; or preventing or relieving the development or worsening of symptoms associated with the subject's condition or disease.

The subject and patient are used herein interchangeably. They refer to a human or another mammal (e.g., mouse, rat, rabbit, dog, cat, cattle, swine, sheep, horse or primate) that can be afflicted with or is susceptible to a disease or disorder (e.g., PD) but may or may not have the disease or disorder. In certain embodiments, the subject is a human being.

Preferably, the amount effective or effective amount is the amount of an active ingredient or a pharmaceutical composition disclosed herein that when administered to a subject for treating a disease, is sufficient to effect such treatment of the disease. Any improvement in the patient is considered sufficient to achieve treatment. An effective amount of an active ingredient or a pharmaceutical composition disclosed herein, used for the regeneration of defected bone can vary depending upon the manner of administration, the age, body weight, and general health of the patient. Ultimately, the prescribers or researchers will decide the appropriate amount and dosage regimen.

In the treatment or prevention method according to one embodiment of the present invention, the composition including the CP-BMP recombinant protein as an active ingredient may be administered in a common manner via oral, buccal, rectal, intravenous, intra-arterial, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, intrastemal, percutaneous, topical, intraocular or subcutaneous route, more preferably via subcutaneous or intravenous injection route.

Advantageous Effects

One embodiment of the present invention provides artificially constructed aMTD sequences based on the critical factors (CFs) that overcome the limitations of prior arts (MTM/MTS/MTD), such as limited diversity and unpredictable cell-permeability. Based on the CFs that assure the cell-permeability, the aMTD displays these sequences shows up to 109.9 relative fold enhanced ability compared to prior arts thereof to deliver biologically active macromolecules into live cells. Therefore, one embodiment of the present invention would allow their practically effective applications in molecule delivery, drug delivery, protein therapy, intracellular protein therapy, protein replacement therapy, peptide therapy, gene delivery and so on.

With enhanced solubility and yield, aMTD/SD-fused BMP recombinant protein could be produced in large quantities. In addition, effective cell-permeability of the recombinant protein overcomes the limitations of previously developed bone regeneration. Therefore, CP-BMP recombinant protein of the present invention would allow practical applications to efficiently bone regeneration for recovery of bone defected by osteogenesis imperfect, osteoporosis, facture and osteoectomy.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows Structure of aMTD- or rPeptide-Fused Recombinant Proteins. A schematic diagram of the His-tagged CRA recombinant proteins is illustrated and constructed according to one embodiment of the present invention. The his-tag for affinity purification (white), aMTD or rPeptide (gray) and cargo A (CRA, black) are shown.

FIGS. 2a to 2c show Construction of Expression Vectors for aMTDs- or rPeptide-Fused Recombinant Proteins. These FIGs. show the agarose gel electrophoresis analysis showing plasmid DNA fragments at 645 bp insert encoding aMTDs or rPeptide-fused CRA cloned into the pET-28a(+) vector according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 3a to 3d show Inducible Expression of aMTD- or rPeptide-Fused Recombinant Proteins. Expressed recombinant aMTD- or random peptide-fused CRA recombinant proteins were transformed in E. coli BL21(DE3) strain. Expression of recombinant proteins in E. coli before (−) and after (+) induction with IPTG was monitored by SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie blue.

FIGS. 4a and 4b show Purification of aMTD- or rPeptide-Fused Recombinant Proteins. Expressed recombinant proteins were purified by Ni²⁺ affinity chromatography under the natural condition. Purification of recombinant proteins displayed through SDS-PAGE analysis.

FIGS. 5a to 5u show Determination of aMTD-Mediated Cell-Permeability. Cell-permeability of a negative control (A: rP38) and reference hydrophobic CPPs (MTM12 and MTD85) are shown. The cell-permeability of each aMTD and/or rPeptide is visually compared to that of the cargo protein lacking peptide sequence (HCA). Gray shaded area represents untreated RAW 264.7 cells (vehicle); thin light gray line represents the cells treated with equal molar concentration of FITC (FITC only); dark thick line indicates the cells treated with FITC-his-tagged CRA protein (HCA); and the cells treated with the FITC-proteins (HMCA) fused to negative control (rP38), reference CPP (MTM12 or MTD85) or new hydrophobic CPP (aMTD) are shown with light thick line and indicated by arrows.

FIGS. 6a to 6c show Determination of rPeptide-Mediated Cell-Permeability. The cell-permeability of each aMTD and/or rPeptide was visually compared to that of the cargo protein lacking peptide sequence (HCA). Gray shaded area represents untreated RAW 264.7 cells (vehicle); thin light gray line represents the cells treated with equal molar concentration of FITC (FITC only); dark thick line indicates the cells treated with FITC-his-tagged CRA protein (HCA); and the cells treated with the FITC-proteins fused to rPeptides are shown with light thick line and indicated by arrows.

FIGS. 7a to 7k shows Visualized Cell-Permeability of aMTD-Fused Recombinant Proteins. NIH3T3 cells were treated with FITC-labeled protein (10 uM) fused to aMTD for 1 hour at 37° C. Cell-permeability of the proteins was visualized by laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSM700 version).

FIG. 8 show Visualized Cell-Permeability of rPeptide-Fused Recombinant Proteins. Cell-permeability of rPeptide-fused recombinant proteins was visualized by laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSM700 version).

FIGS. 9a to 9c show Relative Cell-Permeability of aMTD-Fused Recombinant Proteins Compared to Negative Control (rP38). The FIGs. show graphs comparing the cell-permeability of the recombinant proteins fused to aMTDs and a negative control (A: rP38).

FIGS. 10a to 10c show Relative Cell-Permeability of aMTD-Fused Recombinant Proteins Compared to Reference CPP (MTM12). The FIGs. show graphs comparing the cell-permeability of the recombinant proteins fused to aMTDs and a reference CPP (MTM12).

FIGS. 11a to 11c show Relative Cell-Permeability of aMTD-Fused Recombinant Proteins Compared to Reference CPP (MTD85). The FIGs. show graphs comparing the cell-permeability of the recombinant proteins fused to aMTDs and a reference CPP (MTD85).

FIG. 12 shows Relative Cell-Permeability of rPeptide-Mediated Recombinant Proteins Compared to Average that of aMTDs. The FIG. 12 shows graphs comparing the cell-permeability of the recombinant proteins fused to rPeptides and that (average value: aMTD AVE) of aMTDs.

FIGS. 13a, 13b, 13c, and 13d show Association of Cell-Permeability with Amino Acid Composition in aMTD Sequences, wherein the graphs display delivery potential (Geometric Mean) of aMTDs influenced with amino acid composition of A, I, V and L, respectively.

FIGS. 14a, 14b, 14c, and 14d show Association of Cell-Permeability with Critical Factors in aMTDs, wherein the graphs show the association of cell-permeability with critical factors [bending potential: proline position (PP) (FIG. 14a ), rigidity/flexibility: instability index (II) (FIG. 14b ), structural feature: aliphatic index (AI) (FIG. 14c ) and hydropathy: grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) (FIG. 14d )].

FIGS. 15a, 15b, 15c, and 15d show Relative Relevance of aMTD-Mediated Cell-Permeability with Critical Factors. Cell-permeability of 10 high and 10 low ranked aMTDs in their delivery potential were examined for their association with the critical factors [bending potential: proline position (PP) (FIG. 15a ), rigidity/flexibility: instability index (II) (FIG. 15b ), structural feature: aliphatic index (AI) (FIG. 15c ) and hydropathy: grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) (FIG. 15d )].

FIG. 16 shows Relative Relevance of rPeptide-Mediated Cell-Permeability with Hydropathy Range (GRAVY). This graph and a chart illustrate relative relevance of rPeptide-mediated cell-permeability with its hydropathy range (GRAVY).

FIG. 17 shows Structural Features of BMP2 and BMP7. A structural composition of BMP families is illustrated and structure design for BMP2/7 recombinant proteins in present invention is based on their basic structure.

FIG. 18a shows Schematic Diagram of His-Tagged BMP2/7 (M form) Recombinant Proteins. Design of BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins containing histidine tag for affinity purification, BMP2/7 (MP), aMTD₂₄, solubilization domain A (SDA), and/or solubilization domain B (SDB).

FIG. 18b shows Schematic Diagram of His-Tagged BMP2/7 (L form) Recombinant Proteins. Design of BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant proteins containing histidine tag for affinity purification, BMP2/7 (LAP+MP), aMTD₂₄, solubilization domain A (SDA), and/or solubilization domain B (SDB).

FIG. 19a shows Construction of Expression for His-Tagged BMP2 (M form) Recombinant Proteins. This figure show the agarose gel electrophoresis analysis show plasmid DNA fragments encoding BMP2 (MP) cloned into the pET-28a(+) vector according to one embodiment of the present invention aMTD-fused BMP2 (MP) and SD.

FIG. 19b shows Construction of Expression for His-Tagged BMP7 (M form) Recombinant Proteins. These agarose gel electrophoresis analysis show plasmid DNA fragments encoding BMP7 (MP) cloned into the pET-28a(+) vector according to one embodiment of the present invention aMTD fused BMP7 (MP) and SD.

FIG. 19c shows Construction of Expression for His-Tagged BMP2 (L form) Recombinant Proteins. These agarose gel electrophoresis analysis show plasmid DNA fragments encoding BMP2 (LAP+MP: LP) cloned into the pET-28a(+) vector according to one embodiment of the present invention aMTD fused BMP2 (LP) and SD.

FIG. 19d shows Construction of Expression for His-Tagged BMP7 (L form) Recombinant Proteins. These agarose gel electrophoresis analysis show plasmid DNA fragments encoding BMP7 (LAP+MP: LP) cloned into the pET-28a(+) vector according to one embodiment of the present invention aMTD fused BMP7 (LP) and SD.

FIG. 20a shows Inducible Expression and Purification of BMP2 (M form/L form) Recombinant Proteins. Expression of BMP2 recombinant proteins in E. coli before (−) and after (+) induction with IPTG, and purification by Ni²⁺ affinity chromatography (P) were confirmed by SDS-PAGE which stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

FIG. 20b shows Inducible Expression and Purification of BMP7 (M form/L form) Recombinant Proteins. Expression of BMP7 recombinant proteins in E. coli before (−) and after (+) induction with IPTG, and purification by Ni²⁺ affinity chromatography (P) were confirmed by SDS-PAGE which stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

FIG. 21 shows Structural Changes of BMP2/7 (L form) Recombinant Proteins. Additional designs (A, B, C) of BMP2/7 (LAP+MP: LP) recombinant proteins contained histidine tag for affinity purification (white), BMP2/7 (LP), aMTD₁₂₃ (black), solubilization domain A (SDA), and/or solubilization domain B (SDB) or solubilization domain C (SDC).

FIG. 22 shows Construction of Expression for Newly Designed BMP2/7 (L form) Recombinant Proteins. These agarose gel electrophoresis analysis show plasmid DNA fragments encoding newly designed BMP2 (LAP+MP: LP) cloned into the pET-28a(+) vector according to one embodiment of the present invention aMTD fused BMP2 (LP) and SD.

FIG. 23a shows Inducible Expression and Purification of Newly Designed BMP2 (L form) Recombinant Proteins. Expression of BMP2 (L form) recombinant proteins before (−) and after (+) induction with IPTG, and purification by Ni²⁺ affinity chromatography (P) were confirmed by SDS-PAGE analysis which stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

FIG. 23b shows Inducible Expression and Purification of Newly Designed BMP7 (L form) Recombinant Proteins. Expression of BMP7 (L form) recombinant proteins before (−) and after (+) induction with IPTG, and purification by Ni²⁺ affinity chromatography (P) were confirmed by SDS-PAGE analysis which stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

FIG. 24 shows aMTD-Mediated Cell-Permeability of BMP2/7 (M form) Recombinant Proteins. RAW 264.7 cells were exposure to FITC-labeled BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (10 uM) compared with control protein fused with/without aMTD and solubilization domain A or B (10 uM) for 1 hour, treated with proteinase K to remove cell associated but non-internalized proteins and analyzed by FACS. Gray shaded area represents untreated RAW 264.7 cells (vehicle) and equimolar concentration of unconjugated FITC (FITC-only, green)-treated cells were served as control.

FIG. 25 shows aMTD-Mediated Intracellular Delivery and Localization of BMP2/7 (M form) Recombinant Proteins. Fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy shows intracellular localization of BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins in NIH3T3 cells after incubated with 10 uM of FITC-conjugated BMP2/7 recombinant proteins, unconjugated FITC (FITC-only) or protein physiological buffer (vehicle) for 1 hour. Nomarski images are provided to show their cell morphology.

FIG. 26 shows Tissue Distribution of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins. Cryosection of saline-perfused organs were prepared from mice 1 hour after the intraperitoneal injection of the BMP2/7 recombinant proteins, vehicle, or FITC only. The images from fluorescence microscopy shows distribution of BMP2/7 recombinant proteins in various organs.

FIG. 27 shows Morphological Differentiation in C2C12 Myoblasts with CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins. The images of cells show the morphology of the C2C12 myoblasts after treatment of BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins with dose variation. (×100 magnification). The C2C12 cells were treated with the BMP2/7 recombinant proteins for 7 days. The proteins were freshly replaced every day. To compare the effect of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins, the morphology is compared with BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins.

FIG. 28 shows Stimulatory Effect of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins on Smad Signaling in C2C12 Cells. The C2C12 cells were treated for 15 minutes with 10 uM BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins and then extracted protein in these cells. The cell lysates were analyzed for phosphorylated Smad-1/5/8 and β-actin expression.

FIG. 29 shows Stimulatory Effect of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins on ALP Activity in MC3T3-E1 Cells. The BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (10 uM) were continuously treated for 5 days and then measured ALP activity.

FIG. 30 shows Osteogenic Differentiation of C2C12 Myoblasts by Using Combinational Treatment of CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 Recombinant Proteins. The images of cells, which were continuously treated with vehicle (control) or 1 uM of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (×100 magnification) for 7 days.

FIG. 31 shows ALP Activity of C1C12 Myoblasts by Using Combinational Treatment of CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 Recombinant Proteins. The CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (10 uM) were continuously treated for 5 days and then measured ALP activity.

FIG. 32 shows Osteoblastic Effect of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Protein in Calvarial Injection Mouse Models. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained calvarial bone sections in diluent, BMP2/7 recombinant protein treated groups (×400). Arrows indicate newly formed bone matrix.

FIG. 33 shows Relative Activity of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins on New Bone Formation in Calvarial Injection Mouse Models. The graph compared the newly formed ECM thickness of aMTD/SD-fused CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins or aMTD lacking SD-fused BMP2/7 recombinant proteins with protein physiological buffer (diluent).

FIG. 34 shows Structure of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins fused various aMTDs and SDA.

FIGS. 35a and 35b show Inducible Expression and Purification of Newly Designed CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins. Expression of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins before (−) and after (+) induction with IPTG, and purification by Ni²⁺ affinity chromatography (P) were confirmed by SDS-PAGE analysis which stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

FIG. 36a shows aMTD-Mediated Cell-Permeability of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins fused various aMTDs.

FIG. 36b shows Quantitative aMTD-Mediated Cell-Permeability of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins fused various aMTDs.

FIG. 37 shows Stimulatory Effect of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins on ALP Activity in C3H10T1/2 Cells.

FIG. 38 shows aMTD-Mediated Cell-Permeability of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins in RAW 264.7 cells.

FIG. 39 shows aMTD-Mediated Intracellular Delivery and Localization of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins.

FIG. 40a shows Schematic Diagram of BMP2 Recombinant Protein Effects in C2C12 Trans-differentiation into Osteoblasts.

FIG. 40b shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Inhibits Myotube Formation.

FIG. 41 shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Improves ALP Activity.

FIG. 42 shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Induces Smad-mediated Osteogenic Differentiation.

FIG. 43 shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein and BMPR II Co-localize in Golgi, ER and/or Nucleus.

FIG. 44a shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Induces New Bone Formation (Calvarial Injection Assay).

FIG. 44b shows Quantification of New Bone Formation Induced by CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein (Calvarial Injection Assay).

FIG. 45a shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Enhances Bone Regeneration (Calvarial Critical-sized Defect Model).

FIG. 45b shows Quantification of Bone Regeneration Induced by CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein (Calvarial Critical-sized Defect Model).

FIG. 46a shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Significantly Induces Bone Regeneration with Reduced Administration Frequency.

FIG. 46b shows Quantification of Bone Regeneration Induced by CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein with Reduced Administration Frequency.

FIG. 47a shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Induces Bone Regeneration with Dose-dependent Manner.

FIG. 47b shows Quantification of Bone Regeneration Induced by CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein with Dose-dependent Manner.

FIG. 48 shows Structures of rhBMP2, rBMP2 and CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins.

FIG. 49a shows Horses Characteristics Used Equine Bone Defect Model.

FIG. 49b shows Design of Equine Bone Defect Model.

FIG. 50 shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Have Similar Osteogenic Activity To Original BMP2 And Much Better Therapeutic Applicability Even Without Scaffold.

FIG. 51 shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Is Very Safe Protein in vivo (Single Dose Acute Toxicity).

FIGS. 52a and 52b show CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Is Very Safe Protein in vivo (Repeated Dose Toxicity Assay).

FIG. 53 shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Shows Longer Persistency Than Plain-BMP2 Recombinant Protein In Vivo Bioavailability.

FIG. 54 shows CP-BMP2 recombinant protein Is More Stable Than Plain-BMP2 Recombinant Protein In Blood.

FIG. 55 shows CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein Shows Longer Persistence Than Non-CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein.

MODE FOR INVENTION

1. Analysis of Reference Hydrophobic CPPs to Identify ‘Critical Factors’ for Development of Advanced MTDs

Previously reported MTDs were selected from a screen of more than 1,500 signal peptide sequences. Although the MTDs that have been developed did not have a common sequence or sequence motif, they were all derived from the hydrophobic (H) regions of signal sequences (HRSSs) that also lack common sequences or motifs except their hydrophobicity and the tendency to adopt alpha-helical conformations. The wide variation in H-region sequences may reflect prior evolution for proteins with membrane translocating activity and subsequent adaptation to the SRP/Sec61 machinery, which utilizes a methionine-rich signal peptide binding pocket in SRP to accommodate a wide-variety of signal peptide sequences.

Previously described hydrophobic CPPs (e.g. MTS/MTM and MTD) were derived from the hydrophobic regions present in the signal peptides of secreted and cell surface proteins. The prior art consists first, of ad hoc use of H-region sequences (MTS/MTM), and second, of H-region sequences (with and without modification) with highest CPP activity selected from a screen of 1,500 signal sequences (MTM). Second prior art, the modified H-region derived hydrophobic CPP sequences had advanced in diversity with multiple number of available sequences apart from MTS/MTM derived from fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 4. However, the number of MTDs that could be modified from naturally occurring secreted proteins are somewhat limited. Because there is no set of rules in determining their cell-permeability, no prediction for the cell-permeability of modified MTD sequences can be made before testing them.

The hydrophobic CPPs, like the signal peptides from which they originated, did not conform to a consensus sequence, and they had adverse effects on protein solubility when incorporated into protein cargo. We therefore set out to identify optimal sequence and structural determinants, namely critical factors (CFs), to design new hydrophobic CPPs with enhanced ability to deliver macromolecule cargoes including proteins into the cells and tissues while maintaining protein solubility. These newly developed CPPs, advanced macromolecule transduction domains (aMTDs) allowed almost infinite number of possible designs that could be designed and developed based on the critical factors. Also, their cell-permeability could be predicted by their character analysis before conducting any in vitro and/or in vivo experiments. These critical factors below have been developed by analyzing all published reference hydrophobic CPPs.

1-1. Analysis of Hydrophobic CPPs

Seventeen different hydrophobic CPPs (Table 1) published from 1995 to 2014 (Table 2) were selected. After physiological and chemical properties of selected hydrophobic CPPs were analyzed, 11 different characteristics that may be associated with cell-permeability have been chosen for further analysis. These 11 characteristics are as follows: sequence, amino acid length, molecular weight, pI value, bending potential, rigidity/flexibility, structural feature, hydropathy, residue structure, amino acid composition and secondary structure of the sequences (Table 3).

Table 1 shows the Summary of Published Hydrophobic Cell-Penetrating Peptides which were Chosen.

TABLE 1 # Pepides Origin Protein Ref.  1 MTM Homo sapiens NP_001998 Kaposi fibroblast growth factor (K-FGF) 1  2 MTS Homo sapiens NP_001998 Kaposi fibroblast growth factor (K-FGF) 2  3 MTD10 Streptomyces coelicolor NP_625021 Glycosyl hydrolase 8  4 MTD13 Streptomyces coelicolor NP_639877 Putative secreted protein 3  5 MTD47 Streptomyces coelicolor NP_627512 Secreted protein 4  6 MTD56 Homo sapiens P23274 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase B precursor 5  7 MTD73 Drosophila metanogaster AAA17887 Spatzle (spz) protein 5  8 MTD77 Homo sapiens NP_003231 Kaposi fibroblast growth factor (K-FGF) 6  9 MTD84 Phytophthora cactorum AAK63068 Phytotoxic protein PcF precusor 4 10 MTD85 Streptomyces coelicolor NP_629842 Peptide transport system peptide binding 7 protein 11 MTD86 Streptomyces coelicolor NP_629842 Peptide transport system secreted peptide 7 binding protein 12 MTD103 Homo sapiens TMBV19 domain Family member B 8 13 MTD132 Streptomyces coelicolor NP_628377 P60-family secreted protein 4 14 MTD151 Streptomyces coelicolor NP_630126 Secreted chitinase 8 15 MTD173 Streptomyces coelicolor NP_624384 Secreted protein 4 16 MTD174 Streptomyces coelicolor NP_733505 Large, multifunctional secreted protein 8 17 MTD181 Neisseria meningitidis Z2491 CAB84257.1 Putative secreted protein 4

Table 2 shows the Summarizes Reference Information.

TABLE 2 References # Title Journal Year Vol Issue Page 1 Inhibition of Nuclear JOURNALOF 1995 270 24 14255 Translocation of BIOLOGICAL Transcription Factor CHEMISTRY NF-kB by a Synthetic peptide Containing a Cell Membrane- permeable Motif and Nuclear Localization Sequence 2 Epigenetic Regulation NATURE 2001 19 10 929 of Gene Structure BIO- and Function with a TECHNO- Cell-Permeable LOGY Cre Recombinase 3 Cell-Permeable CANCER 2011 71 23 7216 NM23 Blocks the RESEARCH Maintenance and Progression of Established Pulmonary Metastasis 4 Antitumor Activity of MOLECULAR 2012 20 8 1540 Cell-Permeable THERAPY p18INK4-c With Enhanced Membrane and Tissue Penetration 5 Antitumor Activity CLINICAL 2012 19 3 680 of Cell-Permeable CANCER RUNX3 Protein RESEARCH in Gastric Cancer Cells 6 The Effect BIO- 2013 34 26 6261 of Intracellular MATERIALS Protein Delivery on the Ant-Tumor Activity of Recombinant Human Endostatin 7 Partial Somatic to SCIENTIFIC 2014 4 10 4361 Stem Cell REPORTS Transformations Induced By Cell-Permeable Reprogramming Factors 8 Cell-Permeable PLOS ONE 2014 9 7 17 Parkin Proteins Suppress Parkinson Disease-Associated Phenotypes in Cultured Cells and Animals

Table 3 shows the Characteristics of Published Hydrophobic Cell-Penetrating Peptides (A) which were Analyzed.

TABLE 3 Rigidity/ Flexibility Molecular Bending (Instability # Peptides Sequence Length Weight pI Potential Index: II) 1 MTM AAVALLPAVLLALLAP 16 1,515.9 5.6 Bending 45.5 2 MTS AAVLLPVLLAAP 12 1,147.4 5.6 Bending 57.3 3 MTD10 LGGAVVAAPVAAAVAP 16 1,333.5 5.5 Bending 47.9 4 MTD13 LAAAALAVLPL 11 1,022.3 5.5 Bending 26.6 5 MTD47 AAAVPVLVAA 10 881.0 5.6 Bending 47.5 6 MTD56 VLLAAALIA 9 854.1 5.5 No- 8.9 Bending 7 MTD73 PVLLLLA 7 737.9 6.0 No- 36.1 Bending 8 MTD77 AVALLILAV 9 882.1 5.6 No- 30.3 Bending 9 MTD84 AVALVAVVAVA 11 982.2 5.6 No- 9.1 Bending 10 MTD85 LLAAAAALLLA 11 1,010.2 5.5 No- 9.1 Bending 11 MTD86 LLAAAAALLLA 11 1,010.2 5.5 No- 9.1 Bending 12 MTD103 LALPVLLLA 9 922.2 5.5 Bending 51.7 13 MTD132 AVVVPAIVLAAP 12 1,119.4 5.6 Bending 50.3 14 MTD151 AAAPVAAVP 9 1,031.4 5.5 Bending 73.1 15 MTD173 AVIPILAVP 9 892.1 5.6 Bending 48.5 16 MTD174 LILLLPAVALP 12 1,011.8 5.5 Bending 79.1 17 MTD181 AVLLLPAAA 9 838.0 5.6 Bending 51.7 AVE 10.8 ± 2.4 1,011 ± 189.6 5.6 ± 0.1 Proline 40.1 ± 21.9 Presence Structural Feature A/a (Aliphatic Hydropathy Residue Composition Secondary # Index: AI) (GRAVY) Structure A V L I P G Structure Cargo Ref. 1 220.0 2.4 Aliphatic 6 2 6 0 2 0 Helix p50 1 Ring 2 211.7 2.3 — 4 2 4 0 2 0 No-Helix cRE 2 3 140.6 1.8 — 7 4 1 0 2 2 Helix Parkin 8 4 213.6 2.4 — 5 1 4 0 1 0 No-Helix RUNX3 3 5 176.0 2.4 — 5 3 1 0 1 0 No-Helix CMYC 4 6 250.0 3.0 — 4 1 3 1 0 0 Helix ES 5 7 278.6 2.8 — 1 1 4 0 1 0 Helix ES 5 8 271.1 3.3 — 3 2 3 1 0 0 Helix NM23 6 9 212.7 3.1 — 5 5 1 0 0 0 Helix OCT4 4 10 231.8 2.7 — 6 0 5 0 0 0 No-Helix RUNX3 7 11 231.8 2.7 — 6 0 5 0 0 0 No-Helix SOX2 7 12 271.1 2.8 — 2 1 5 0 1 0 Helix p18 8 13 195.0 2.4 — 4 4 1 1 2 0 No-Helix LIN28 4 14 120.0 1.6 — No-Helix Parkin 8 15 216.7 24 — 2 2 1 2 2 0 Helix KLF4 4 16 257.3 2.0 — Helix Parkin 8 17 206.7 2.4 — 4 1 3 0 1 0 Helix SOX2 4 217.9 ± 43.6 2.5 ± 0.4 —

Two peptide/protein analysis programs were used (ExPasy: SoSui: harrier.nagahama-i-bio.ac.jp/sosui/sosui_submit.html) to determine various indexes and structural features of the peptide sequences and to design new sequence. Followings are important factors analyzed.

1-2. Characteristics of Analyzed Peptides: Length, Molecular Weight and pl Value

Average length, molecular weight and pl value of the peptides analyzed were 10.8±2.4, 1,011±189.6 and 5.6±0.1, respectively (Table 4)

Table 4 shows the Summarizes Critical Factors (CFs) of Published Hydrophobic Cell-Penetrating Peptides (A) which were Analyzed.

TABLE 4 Length: 10.8 ± 2.4 Molecular Weight: 1,011 ± 189.6 pl: 5.6 ± 0.1 Bending Potential (BP): Proline presences In the middle and/or the end of peptides, or No Proline. Instability Index (II): 40.1 ± 21.9 Residue Structure & Aliphatic Index (AI): 217.9 ± 43.6 Hydropathy (GRAVY): 2.5 ± 0.4 Aliphatic Ring: Non-polar hydrophobic & aliphatic amino acid (A, V, L, I). Secondary Structure: α-Helix is favored but not required.

1-3. Characteristics of Analyzed Peptides: Bending Potential—Proline Position (PP)

Bending potential (bending or no-bending) was determined based on the fact whether proline (P) exists and/or where the amino acid(s) providing bending potential to the peptide in recombinant protein is/are located. Proline differs from the other common amino acids in that its side chain is bonded to the backbone nitrogen atom as well as the alpha-carbon atom. The resulting cyclic structure markedly influences protein architecture which is often found in the bends of folded peptide/protein chain.

Eleven out of 17 were determined as ‘Bending’ peptide which means that proline is present in the middle of sequence for peptide bending and/or located at the end of the peptide for protein bending. As indicated above, peptide sequences could penetrate the plasma membrane in a “bent” configuration. Therefore, bending or no-bending potential is considered as one of the critical factors for the improvement of current hydrophobic CPPs.

1-4. Characteristics of Analyzed Peptides: Rigidity/Flexibility—Instability Index (II)

Since one of the crucial structural features of any peptide is based on the fact whether the motif is rigid or flexible, which is an intact physicochemical characteristic of the peptide sequence, instability index (II) of the sequence was determined. The index value representing rigidity/flexibility of the peptide was extremely varied (8.9 to 79.1), but average value was 40.1±21.9 which suggested that the peptide should be somehow flexible, but not too much rigid or flexible (Table 3).

1-5. Characteristics of Analyzed Peptides: Structural Features—Structural Feature (Aliphatic Index: AI) and Hydropathy (Grand Average of Hydropathy: GRAVY)

Alanine (V), valine (V), leucine (L) and isoleucine (I) contain aliphatic side chain and are hydrophobic—that is, they have an aversion to water and like to cluster. These amino acids having hydrophobicity and aliphatic residue enable them to pack together to form compact structure with few holes. Analyzed peptide sequence showed that all composing amino acids were hydrophobic (A, V, L and I) except glycine (G) in only one out of 17 (MTD10—Table 3) and aliphatic (A, V, L, I, and P). Their hydropathic index (Grand Average of Hydropathy: GRAVY) and aliphatic index (AI) were 2.5±0.4 and 217.9±43.6, respectively. Their amino acid composition is also indicated in the Table 3.

1-6. Characteristics of Analyzed Peptides: Secondary Structure (Helicity)

As explained above, the CPP sequences may be supposed to penetrate the plasma membrane directly after inserting into the membranes in a “bent” configuration with hydrophobic sequences having α-helical conformation. In addition, our analysis strongly indicated that bending potential was crucial for membrane penetration. Therefore, structural analysis of the peptides was conducted to determine whether the sequences were to form helix or not. Nine peptides were helix and eight were not (Table 3). It seems to suggest that helix structure may not be required.

1-7. Determination of Critical Factors (CFs)

In the 11 characteristics analyzed, the following 6 are selected namely “Critical Factors” for the development of new hydrophobic CPPs—advanced MTDs: amino acid length, bending potential (proline presence and location), rigidity/flexibility (instability index: II), structural feature (aliphatic index: AI), hydropathy (GRAVY) and amino acid composition/residue structure (hydrophobic and aliphatic A/a) (Tables 3 and Table 4).

2. Analysis of Selected Hydrophobic CPPs to Optimize ‘Critical Factors’

Since the analyzed data of the 17 different hydrophobic CPPs (analysis A, Tables 3 and 4) previously developed during the past 2 decades showed high variation and were hard to make common- or consensus-features, analysis B (Tables 5 and 6) and C (Tables 7 and 8) were also conducted to optimize the critical factors for better design of improved CPPs—aMTDs. Therefore, 17 hydrophobic CPPs have been grouped into two groups and analyzed the groups for their characteristics in relation to the cell permeable property. The critical factors have been optimized by comparing and contrasting the analytical data of the groups and determining the common homologous features that may be critical for the cell permeable property.

2-1. Selective Analysis (B) of Peptides Used to Biologically Active Cargo Protein for In Vivo

In analysis B, eight CPPs were used with each biologically active cargo in vivo. Length was 11±3.2, but 3 out of 8 CPPs possessed little bending potential. Rigidity/Flexibility (instability index: II) was 41±15, but removing one [MTD85: rigid, with minimal II (9.1)] of the peptides increased the overall instability index to 45.6±9.3. This suggested that higher flexibility (40 or higher II) is potentially be better. All other characteristics of the 8 CPPs were similar to the analysis A, including structural feature and hydropathy (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 5 shows the Characteristics of Published Hydrophobic Cell-Penetrating Peptides (B): Selected CPPs That were Used to Each Cargo In Vivo.

TABLE 5 Rigidity/ Flexibility Molecular Bending (Instability # Peptides Sequence Length Weight pI Potential Index: II) 1 MTM AAVALLPAVLLALLAP 16 1,515.9 5.6 Bending 45.5 2 MTS AAVLLPVLLAAP 12 1,147.4 5.6 Bending 57.3 3 MTD10 LGGAVVAAPVAAAVAP 16 1,333.5 5.5 Bending 47.9 4 MTD73 PVLLLLA 7 737.9 6.0 No- 36.1 Bending 5 MTD77 AVALLILAV 9 882.1 5.6 No- 30.3 Bending 6 MTD85 LLAAAAALLLA 11 1,010.2 5.5 No- 9.1* Bending 7 MTD103 LALPVLLLA 9 922.2 5.5 Bending 51.7 8 MTD132 AVVVPAIVLAAP 12 1,119.4 5.6 Bending 50.3 AVE 11 ± 3.2 1,083 ± 252 5.6 ± 0.1 Proline 41 ± 15 Presence Structural Feature A/a (Aliphatic Hydropathy Residue Composition Secondary # Index: AI) (GRAVY) Structure A V L I P G Structure Cargo Ref. 1 220.0 2.4 Aliphatic 6 2 6 0 2 0 Helix p50 1 Ring 2 211.7 2.3 — 4 2 4 0 2 0 No-Helix CRE 2 3 140.6 1.8 — 7 4 1 0 2 2 Helix Parkin 8 4 278.6 2.8 — 1 1 4 0 1 0 Helix ES 6 5 271.1 3.3 — 3 2 3 1 0 0 Helix NM23 3 6 2318 2.7 — 6 0 5 0 0 0 No-Helix RUNX3 5 7 271.1 2.8 — 2 1 5 0 1 0 Helix p18 4 8 195.0 2.4 — 4 4 1 1 2 0 Helix LIN28 7 227 ± 47 2.5 ± 0.4

Table 6 shows the Summarized Critical Factors of Published Hydrophobic Cell-Penetrating Peptides (B).

TABLE 6 Length: 11 ± 3.2 Molecular Weight: 1,083 ± 252 pl: 5.6 ± 0.1 Bending Potential (BP): Proline presences in the middle and/or the end of peptides, or No Proline. Instability Index (II): 41.0 ± 15 (*Removing the MTD85 increases II to 45.6 ± 9.3) Residue Structure & Aliphatic Index (AI): 227 ± 47 Hydropathy (GRAVY): 2.5 ± 0.4 Aliphatic Ring: Non-polar hydrophobic & aliphatic amino acid (A, V, L, I). Secondary Structure: α-Helix is favored but not required.

2-2. Selective Analysis (C) of Peptides that Provided Bending Potential and Higher Flexibility

To optimize the ‘Common Range and/or Consensus Feature of Critical Factor’ for the practical design of aMTDs and the random peptides (rPs or rPeptides), which were to prove that the ‘Critical Factors’ determined in the analysis A, B and C were correct to improve the current problems of hydrophobic CPPs—protein aggregation, low solubility/yield, and poor cell-/tissue-permeability of the recombinant proteins fused to the MTS/MTM or MTD, and non-common sequence and non-homologous structure of the peptides, empirically selected peptides were analyzed for their structural features and physicochemical factor indexes.

Hydrophobic CPPs which did not have a bending potential, rigid or too much flexible sequences (too much low or too much high Instability Index), or too low or too high hydrophobic CPPs were unselected, but secondary structure was not considered because helix structure of sequence was not required.

In analysis C, eight selected CPP sequences that could provide a bending potential and higher flexibility were finally analyzed (Table 7 and 8). Common amino acid length is 12 (11.6±3.0). Proline is presence in the middle of and/or the end of sequence. Rigidity/Flexibility (II) is 45.5 to 57.3 (Avg: 50.1±3.6). AI and GRAVY representing structural feature and hydrophobicity of the peptide are 204.7±37.5 and 2.4±0.3, respectively. All peptides are consisted with hydrophobic and aliphatic amino acids (A, V, L, I, and P). Therefore, analysis C was chosen as a standard for the new design of new hydrophobic CPPs—aMTDs.

Table 7 shows the Characteristics of Published Hydrophobic Cell-Penetrating Peptides

(C): Selected CPPs that Provided Bending Potential and Higher Flexibility.

TABLE 7 Rigidity/ Flexibility Molecular Bending (Instability # Peptides Sequence Length Weight pI Potential Index: II) 1 MTM AAVALLPAVLLALLAP 16 1515.9 5.6 Bending 45.5 2 MTS AAVLLPVLLAAP 12 1147.4 5.6 Bending 57.3 3 MTD10 LGGAVVAAPVAAAVAP 16 1333.5 5.5 Bending 47.9 4 MTD47 AAAVPVLVAA 10 881.0 5.6 Bending 47.5 5 MTD103 LALPVLLLA 9 922.2 5.5 Bending 51.7 6 MTD132 AVVVPAIVLAAP 12 1119.4 5.6 Bending 50.3 7 MTD173 AVIPILAVP 9 892.1 5.6 Bending 48.5 8 MTD181 AVLLLPAAA 9 838.0 5.6 Bending 51.7 AVE 11.6 ± 3.0 1081.2 ± 244.6 5.6 ± 0.1 Proline 50.1 ± 3.6 Presence Structural Feature A/a (Aliphatic Hydropathy Residue Composition Secondary # Index: AI) (GRAVY) Structure A V L I P G Structure Cargo Ref. 1 220.0 2.4 Aliphatic 6 2 6 0 2 0 Helix p50 1 Ring 2 211.7 2.3 — 4 2 4 0 2 0 No-Helix CRE 2 3 140.6 1.8 — 7 4 1 0 2 2 Helix Parkin 8 4 176.0 2.4 — 5 3 1 0 1 0 No-Helix CMYC 4 5 271.1 2.8 — 2 1 5 0 1 0 Helix p18 8 6 195.0 2.4 — 4 4 1 1 2 0 No-Helix LIN28 4 7 216.7 2.4 — 2 2 1 2 2 0 Helix KLF4 4 8 206.7 2.4 — 4 1 3 0 1 0 No-Helix SOX2 4 204.7 ± 37.5 2.4 ± 0.3

Table 8 shows the Summarized Critical Factors of Published Hydrophobic Cell-Penetrating Peptides (C).

TABLE 8 Length: 11.6 ± 3.0 Molecular Weight: 1,081.2 ± 224.6 pl: 5.6 ± 0.1 Bending Potential (BP): Proline presences in the middle and/or the end of peptides. Instability Index (II): 50.1 ± 3.6 Residue Structure & Aliphatic Index (AI): 204.7 ± 37.5 Hydropathy (GRAVY): 2.4 ± 0.3 Aliphatic Ring: Non-polar hydrophobic & aliphatic amino acid (A, V, L, I). Secondary Structure: α-Helix is favored but not required. 3. New Design of Improved Hydrophobic CPPs—aMTDs Based on the Optimized Critical Factors

3-1. Determination of Common Sequence and/or Common Homologous Structure

As mentioned above, H-regions of signal sequence (HOURSS)-derived CPPs (MTS/MTM and MTD) do not have a common sequence, sequence motif, and/or common-structural homologous feature. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the aim is to develop improved hydrophobic CPPs formatted in the common sequence- and structural-motif which satisfy newly determined ‘Critical Factors’ to have ‘Common Function,’ namely, to facilitate protein translocation across the membrane with similar mechanism to the analyzed reference CPPs. Based on the analysis A, B and C, the common homologous features have been analyzed to determine the critical factors that influence the cell-permeability. The range value of each critical factor has been determined to include the analyzed index of each critical factor from analysis A, B and C to design novel aMTDs (Table 9). These features have been confirmed experimentally with newly designed aMTDs in their cell-permeability.

Table 9 shows the Comparison The Range/Feature of Each Critical Factor Between The Value of Analyzed CPPs and The Value Determined for New Design of Novel aMTDs Sequences.

TABLE 9 Summarized Critical Factors of aMTD Selected CPPs Newly Designed CPPs Critical Factor Range Range Bending Potential Proline presences Proline presences (Proline Position: PP) in the middle in the middle and/or at the (5′, 6′, 7′ or 8′) and end of peptides at the end of peptides Rigidity/Flexibility 45.5-57.3 40-60 (Instability Index: II) (50.1 ± 3.6) Structural Feature 140.6-220.0 180-220 (Aliphatic Index: AI) (204.7 ± 37.5) Hydropathy 1.8-2.8 2.1-2.6 (Grand Average of  (2.4 ± 0.3) Hydropathy GRAVY) Length 11.6 ± 3.0  9-13 (Number of Amino Acid) Amino acid Composition A, V, I, L, P A, V, I, L, P

In Table 9, universal common features and sequence/structural motif are provided. Length is 9 to 13 amino acids, and bending potential is provided with the presence of proline in the middle of sequence (at 5′, 6′, 7′ or 8′ amino acid) for peptide bending and at the end of peptide for recombinant protein bending and Rigidity/Flexibility of aMTDs is II >40 are described in Table 9.

3-2. Critical Factors for Development of Advanced MTDs

Recombinant cell-permeable proteins fused to the hydrophobic CPPs to deliver therapeutically active cargo molecules including proteins into live cells had previously been reported, but the fusion proteins expressed in bacteria system were hard to be purified as a soluble form due to their low solubility and yield. To address the crucial weakness for further clinical development of the cell-permeable proteins as protein-based biotherapeutics, greatly improved form of the hydrophobic CPP, named as advanced MTD (aMTD) has newly been developed through critical factors-based peptide analysis. The critical factors used for the current invention of the aMTDs are herein (Table 9).

1. Amino Acid Length: 9 to 13

2. Bending Potential (Proline Position: PP)

: Proline presences in the middle (from 5′ to 8′ amino acid) and at the end of sequence

3. Rigidity/Flexibility (Instability Index: II): 40 to 60

4. Structural Feature (Aliphatic Index: AI): 180 to 220

5. Hydropathy (GRAVY): 2.1 to 2.6

6. Amino Acid Composition: Hydrophobic and Aliphatic amino acids to A, V, L, I and P

3-3. Design of Potentially Best aMTDs that all Critical Factors are Considered and Satisfied

After careful consideration of six critical factors derived from analysis of unique features of hydrophobic CPPs, advanced macromolecule transduction domains (aMTDs) have been designed and developed based on the common 12 amino acid platform which satisfies the critical factors including amino acid length (9 to 13) determined from the analysis.

Unlike previously published hydrophobic CPPs that require numerous experiments to determine their cell-permeability, newly developed aMTD sequences could be designed by performing just few steps as follows using above mentioned platform to follow the determined range value/feature of each critical factor.

First, prepare the 12 amino acid sequence platform for aMTD. Second, place proline (P) in the end (12′) of sequence and determine where to place proline in one of four U(s) in 5′, 6′, 7′, and 8. Third, alanine (A), valine (V), leucine (L) or isoleucine (I) is placed in either X(s) and/or U(s), where proline is not placed. Lastly, determine whether the amino acid sequences designed based on the platform, satisfy the value or feature of six critical factors to assure the cell permeable property of aMTD sequences. Through these processes, numerous novel aMTD sequences have been constructed. The expression vectors for preparing non-functional cargo recombinant proteins fused to each aMTD, expression vectors have been constructed and forcedly expressed in bacterial cells. These aMTD-fused recombinant proteins have been purified in soluble form and determined their cell-permeability quantitatively. aMTD sequences have been newly designed, numbered from 1 to 240, as shown in Tables 10 to 15. In Tables 10 to 15, sequence ID Number is a sequence listings for reference, and aMTD numbers refer to amino acid listing numbers that actually have been used at the experiments. For further experiments, aMTD numbers have been used. In addition, polynucleotide sequences shown in the sequence lists have been numbered from SEQ ID NO: 241 to SEQ ID NO: 480.

Tables 10 to 15 show the 240 new hydrophobic aMTD sequences that were developed to satisfy all critical factors.

TABLE 10 Rigidity/ Sturctural Sequence Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Residue ID Number aMTD Sequences Length (II) (AI) (GRAVY) Structure 1 1 AAALAPVVLALP 12 57.3 187.5 2.1 Aliphatic 2 2 AAAVPLLAVVVP 12 41.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 3 3 AALLVPAAVLAP 12 57.3 187.5 2.1 Aliphatic 4 4 ALALLPVAALAP 12 57.3 195.8 2.1 Aliphatic 5 5 AAALLPVALVAP 12 57.3 187.5 2.1 Aliphatic 6 11 VVALAPALAALP 12 57.3 187.5 2.1 Aliphatic 7 12 LLAAVPAVLLAP 12 57.3 211.7 2.3 Aliphatic 8 13 AAALVPVVALLP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 9 21 AVALLPALLAVP 12 57.3 211.7 2.3 Aliphatic 10 22 AVVLVPVLAAAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 11 23 VVLVLPAAAAVP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 12 24 IALAAPALIVAP 12 50.2 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 13 25 IVAVAPALVALP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 14 42 VAALPVVAVVAP 12 57.3 186.7 2.4 Aliphatic 15 43 LLAAPLVVAAVP 12 41.3 187.5 2.1 Aliphatic 16 44 ALAVPVALLVAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 17 61 VAALPVLLAALP 12 57.3 211.7 2.3 Aliphatic 18 62 VALLAPVALAVP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 19 63 AALLVPALVAVP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic

TABLE 11 Rigidity/ Sturctural Sequence Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Residue ID Number aMTD Sequences Length (II) (AI) (GRAVY) Structure 20 64 AIVALPVAVLAP 12 50.2 203.2 2.4 Aliphatic 21 65 IAIVAPVVALAP 12 50.2 203.2 2.4 Aliphatic 22 81 AALLPALAALLP 12 57.3 204.2 2.1 Aliphatic 23 82 AVVLAPVAAVLP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 24 83 LAVAAPLALALP 12 41.3 195.8 2.1 Aliphatic 25 84 AAVAAPLLLALP 12 41.3 195.8 2.1 Aliphatic 26 85 LLVLPAAALAAP 12 57.3 195.8 2.1 Aliphatic 27 101 LVALAPVAAVLP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 28 102 LALAPAALALLP 12 57.3 204.2 2.1 Aliphatic 29 103 ALIAAPILALAP 12 57.3 204.2 2.2 AliphatiC 30 104 AVVAAPLVLALP 12 41.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 31 105 LLALAPAALLAP 12 57.3 204.1 2.1 Aliphatic 32 121 AIVALPALALAP 12 50.2 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 33 123 AAIIVPAALLAP 12 50.2 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 34 124 IAVALPALIAAP 12 50.3 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 35 141 AVIVLPALAVAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 36 143 AVLAVPAVLVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 37 144 VLAIVPAVALAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 38 145 LLAVVPAVALAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 39 161 AVIALPAL1AAP 12 57.3 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 40 162 AVVALPAALIVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 41 163 LALVLPAALAAP 12 57.3 195.8 2.1 Aliphatic 42 164 LAAVLPALLAAP 12 57.3 195.8 2.1 Aliphatic 43 165 ALAVPVALAIVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 44 182 ALIAPVVALVAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 45 183 LLAAPVVIALAP 12 57.3 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 46 184 LAAIVPAIIAVP 12 50.2 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 47 185 AALVLPLIIAAP 12 41.3 220.0 2.4 Aliphatic 48 201 LALAVPALAALP 12 57.3 195.8 2.1 Aliphatic 49 204 LIAALPAVAALP 12 57.3 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 50 205 ALALVPAIAALP 12 57.3 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 51 221 AAILAPIVALAP 12 50.2 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 52 222 ALLIAPAAVIAP 12 57.3 195.7 2.2 Aliphatic 53 223 AILAVPIAVVAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 54 224 ILAAVPIALAAP 12 57.3 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 55 225 VAALLPAAAVLP 12 57.3 187.5 2.1 Aliphatic 56 241 AAAVVPVLLVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 57 242 AALLVPALVAAP 12 57.3 187.5 2.1 Aliphatic 58 243 AAVLLPVALAAP 12 57.3 187.5 2.1 Aliphatic 59 245 AAALAPVLALVP 12 57.3 187.5 2.1 Aliphatic 60 261 LVLVPLLAAAAP 12 41.3 211.6 2.3 Aliphatic 61 262 ALIAVPAIIVAP 12 50.2 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 62 263 ALAVIPAAAILP 12 54.9 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 63 264 LAAAPVVIVIAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 64 265 VLAIAPLLAAVP 12 41.3 211.6 2.3 Aliphatic 65 281 ALIVLPAAVAVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 66 282 VLAVAPALIVAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 67 283 AALLAPALIVAP 12 50.2 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 68 284 ALIAPAVAL1VP 12 50.2 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 69 285 AIVLLPAAVVAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic

TABLE 12 Rigidity/ Sturctural Sequence Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Residue ID Number aMTD Sequences Length (II) (AI) (GRAVY) Structure 70 331 VIAAPVLAVLAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 71 302 LALAPALALLAP 12 57.3 204.2 2.1 Aliphatic 72 304 AIILAPIAAIAP 12 57.3 204.2 2.3 Aliphatic 73 305 IALAAPILLAAP 12 57.3 204.2 2.2 Aliphatic 74 321 IVAVALPALAVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 75 322 VVAIVLPALAAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 76 323 IVAVALPVALAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 77 324 IVAVALPAALVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 78 325 IVAVALPAVALP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 79 341 IVAVALPAVLAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 80 342 VIVALAPAVLAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 81 343 IVAVALPALVAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 82 345 ALLIVAPVAVAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 83 381 AVVIVAPAVIAP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 84 363 AVLAVAPALIVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 85 364 LVAAVAPALIVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 86 365 AVIVVAPALLAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 87 381 VVAIVLPAVAAP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 88 382 AAALVIPAILAP 12 54.9 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 89 383 VIVALAPALLAP 12 50.2 211.6 2.3 Aliphatic 90 384 VIVAIAPALLAP 12 50.2 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 91 385 IVAIAVPALVAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 92 401 AALAVIPAAILP 12 54.9 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 93 402 ALAAVIPAAILP 12 54.9 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 94 403 AAALVIPAAILP 12 54.9 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 95 404 LAAAVIPAAILP 12 54.9 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 96 405 LAAAVIPVAILP 12 54.9 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 97 421 AAILAAPLIAVP 12 57.3 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 98 422 VVAILAPLLAAP 12 57.3 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 99 424 AVVVAAPVLALP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 100 425 AVVAIAPVLALP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 101 442 ALAALVPAVLVP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 102 443 ALAALVPVALVP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 103 444 LAAALVPVALVP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 104 445 ALAALVPALVVP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 105 461 IAAVIVPAVALP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 106 462 IAAVLVPAVALP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 107 463 AVAILVPLLAAP 12 57.3 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 108 464 AVVIIVPLAAAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 109 465 IAAVIVPVAALP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 110 481 AIAIAIVPVALP 12 50.2 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 111 482 ILAVAAIPVAVP 12 54.9 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 112 483 ILAAAIIPAALP 12 54.9 204.1 2.2 Aliphatic 113 484 LAVVLAAPAIVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 114 485 AILAAIVPLAVP 12 50.2 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 115 501 VIVALAVPALAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 116 502 AIVALAVPVLAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 117 503 AAIIIVLPAALP 12 50.2 220.0 2.4 Aliphatic 118 504 LIVALAVPALAP 12 50.2 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 119 505 AIIIVIAPAAAP 12 50.2 195.8 2.3 Aliphatic

TABLE 13 Rigidity/ Sturctural Sequence Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Residue ID Number aMTD Sequences Length (II) (AI) (GRAVY) Structure 120 521 LAALIVVPAVAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 121 522 ALLVIAVPAVAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 122 524 AVALIVVPALAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 123 525 ALAIVVAPVAVP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 124 541 LLALIIAPAAAP 12 57.3 204.1 2.1 Aliphatic 125 542 ALALIIVPAVAP 12 50.2 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 126 543 LLAALIA^(P)AAL^(P) 12 57.3 204.1 2.1 AliphatiC 127 544 IVALIVAPAAVP 12 43.1 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 128 545 VVLVLAAPAAVP 12 57.3 195.0 2.3 Aliphatic 129 661 AAVAIVLPAVVP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 130 562 ALIAAIVPALVP 12 50.2 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 131 563 ALAVIVVPALAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 132 564 VAIALIVPALAP 12 50.2 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 133 565 VAIVLVAPAVAP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 134 582 VAVALIVPALAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 135 583 AVILALAPIVAP 12 50.2 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 136 585 ALIVAIAPALVP 12 50.2 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 137 601 AAILIAVPIAAP 12 57.3 195.8 2.3 Aliphatic 138 602 VIVALAAPVLAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 139 603 VLVALAAPVIAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 140 604 VALIAVAPAVVP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 141 605 VIAAVLAPVAVP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 142 622 ALIVLAAPVAVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 143 623 VAAAIALPAIVP 12 50.2 187.5 2.3 Aliphatic 144 625 ILAAAAAPLIVP 12 50.2 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 145 643 LALVLAAPAIVP 12 50.2 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 146 645 ALAVVALPAIVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 147 661 AAILAPIVAALP 12 65.2 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 148 664 ILIAIAIPAAAP 12 54.9 204.1 2.3 Aliphatic 149 665 LAIVLAAPVAVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 150 666 AALAIIAPAIVP 12 50.2 195.8 2.3 Aliphatic 151 667 LAVAIVAPALVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 152 683 LAIVLAAPAVLP 12 50.2 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 153 684 AAIVLALPAVLP 12 50.2 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 154 685 ALLVAVLPAALP 12 57.3 211.7 2.3 Aliphatic 155 ese AALVAVLPVALP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 156 687 AILAVALPLLAP 12 57.3 220.0 2.3 Aliphatic 157 703 IVAVALVPALAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 158 705 IVAVALLPALAP 12 50.2 211.7 2.4 AliphatiC 159 706 IVAVALLPAVAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 160 707 IVALAVLPAVAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 161 724 VAVLAVLPALAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 162 725 IAVLAVAPAVLP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 163 726 LAVAIIAPAVAP 12 57.3 187.5 2.2 Aliphatic 164 727 VALAIALPAVLP 12 57.3 211.6 2.3 Aliphatic 165 743 AlAIALVPVALP 12 57.3 211.6 2.4 Aliphatic 166 744 AAVVIVAPVALP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 167 746 VAIIVVAPALAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 168 747 VALLAIAPALAP 12 57.3 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 169 763 VAVLIAVPALAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic

TABLE 14 Rigidity/ Sturctural Sequence Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Residue ID Number aMTD Sequences Length (II) (AI) (GRAVY) Structure 170 764 AVALAVLPAVVP 12 57.3 195.0 2.3 Aliphatic 171 765 AVALAVVPAVLP 12 57.3 195.0 2.3 Aliphatic 172 766 IVVIAVAPAVAP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 173 767 IVVAAVVPALAP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 174 783 IVALVPAVAIAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.5 Aliphatic 175 784 VAALPAVALVVP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 176 786 LVAIAPLAVLAP 12 41.3 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 177 787 AVALVPVIVAAP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 178 788 AlAVAIAPVALP 12 57.3 187.5 2.3 Aliphatic 179 803 AIALAVPVLALP 12 57.3 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 180 805 LVLIAAAPIALP 12 41.3 220.0 2.4 Aliphatic 181 806 LVALAVPAAVLP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 182 807 AVALAVPALVLP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 183 808 LVVLAAAPLAVP 12 41.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 184 809 LIVLAAPALAAP 12 50.2 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 185 810 VIVLAAPALAAP 12 50.2 187.5 2.2 Aliphatic 186 811 AVVLAVPALAVP 12 57.3 195.0 2.3 Aliphatic 187 824 LIIVAAAPAVAP 12 50.2 187.5 2.3 Aliphatic 188 825 IVAVIVAPAVAP 12 43.2 195.0 2.5 Aliphatic 189 826 LVALAAPIIAVP 12 41.3 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 190 827 IAAVLAAPALVP 12 57.3 187.5 2.2 Aliphatic 191 828 IALLAAPIIAVP 12 41.3 220.0 2.4 Aliphatic 192 829 AALALVAPVIVP 12 50.2 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 193 830 IALVAAPVALVP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 194 831 IIVAVAPAAIVP 12 43.2 203.3 2.5 Aliphatic 195 832 AVAAIVPVIVAP 12 43.2 195.0 2.5 Aliphatic 196 843 AVLVLVAPAAAP 12 41.3 219.2 2.5 Aliphatic 197 844 VVALLAPLIAAP 12 41.3 211.8 2.4 Aliphatic 198 845 AAVVIAPLLAVP 12 41.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 199 846 IAVAVAAPLLVP 12 41.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 200 847 LVAIVVLPAVAP 12 50.2 219.2 2.6 Aliphatic 201 848 AVAIVVLPAVAP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 202 849 AVILLAPLIAAP 12 57.3 220.0 2.4 Aliphatic 203 850 LVIALAAPVALP 12 57.3 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 204 851 VLAVVLPAVALP 12 57.3 219.2 2.5 Aliphatic 205 852 VLAVAAPAVLLP 12 57.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 206 863 AAVVLLPIIAAP 12 41.3 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 207 864 ALLVIAPAIAVP 12 57.3 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 208 865 AVLVIAVPAIAP 12 57.3 203.3 2.5 Aliphatic 209 867 ALLVVIAPLAAP 12 41.3 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 210 868 VLVAAILPAAIP 12 54.9 211.7 2.4 Aliphatic 211 870 VLVAAVLPIAAP 12 41.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 212 872 VLAAAVLPLVVP 12 41.3 219.2 2.5 Aliphatic 213 875 AIAIVVPAVAVP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 214 877 VAIIAVPAVVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 215 878 IVALVAPAAVVP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 216 879 AAIVLLPAVVVP 12 50.2 219.1 2.5 Aliphatic 217 881 AALIVVPAVAVP 12 50.2 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 218 882 AIALVVPAVAVP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 219 883 LAIVPAAIAALP 12 50.2 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic

TABLE 15 Rigidity/ Sturctural Sequence Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Residue ID Number aMTD Sequences Length (II) (AI) (GRAVY) Structure 220 885 LVAIAPAVAVLP 12 57.3 203.3 2.4 Aliphatic 221 887 VLAVAPAVAVLP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 222 888 ILAVVAIPAAAP 12 54.9 187.5 2.3 Aliphatic 223 889 ILVAAAPIAALP 12 57.3 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 224 891 ILAVAAIPAALP 12 54.9 195.8 2.2 Aliphatic 225 893 VIAIPA1LAAAP 12 54.9 195.8 2.3 Aliphatic 226 895 AIIIVVPAIAAP 12 50.2 211.7 2.5 Aliphatic 227 896 AILIVVAPIAAP 12 50.2 211.7 2.5 Aliphatic 228 897 AVIVPVAI1AAP 12 50.2 203.3 2.5 Aliphatic 229 899 AVVIALPAVVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 230 900 ALVAVIAPVVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 231 901 ALVAVLPAVAVP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 232 902 ALVAPLLAVAVP 12 41.3 203.3 2.3 Aliphatic 233 904 AVLAVVAPVVAP 12 57.3 186.7 2.4 Aliphatic 234 905 AVIAVAPLVVAP 12 41.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 235 906 AVIALAPVVVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 236 907 VAIALAPVVVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.4 Aliphatic 237 908 VALALAPVVVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.3 Aliphatic 238 910 VAALLPAVVVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.3 Aliphatic 239 911 VALALPAVVVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.3 Aliphatic 240 912 VALLAPAVVVAP 12 57.3 195.0 2.3 Aliphatic 52.6 ± 5.1 201.7 ± 7.8 2.3 ± 0.1

3-4. Design of the Peptides that Did not Satisfy at Least One Critical Factor

To demonstrate that present invention of new hydrophobic CPPs—aMTDs, which satisfy all critical factors described above, are correct and rationally designed, the peptides which do not satisfy at least one critical factor have also been designed. Total of 31 rPeptides (rPs) are designed, developed and categorized as follows: no bending peptides, either no proline in the middle as well at the end and/or no central proline; rigid peptides (II<40); too much flexible peptides; aromatic peptides (aromatic ring presences); hydrophobic, with non-aromatic peptides but have amino acids other than A, V, L, 1, P or additional proline residues; hydrophilic, but non-aliphatic peptides.

3-4-1. Peptides that do not Satisfy the Bending Potential

Table 16 shows the peptides that do not have any proline in the middle (at 5′, 6′, 7′ or 8′) and at the end of the sequences. In addition, Table 16 describes the peptides that do not have proline in the middle of the sequences. All these peptides are supposed to have no-bending potential.

TABLE 16 Proline Rigidity/ Sturctural Position Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Group rPeptide ID Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) No-Bending Peptides 931 AVLIAPAILAAA 12  6 57.3 204.2 2.5 (No Proline at 5, 6, 7 936 ALLILAAAVAAP 12 12 41.3 204.2 2.4 or 8 and/or 12) 152 LAAAVAAVAALL 12 None 9.2 204.2 2.7 27 LAIVAAAAALVA 12 None 2.1 204.2 2.8 935 ALLILPAAAVAA 12  6 57.3 204.2 2.4 670 AULILAAAVAAL 12 None 25.2 236.6 2.8 934 LILAPAAVVAAA 12  5 57.3 195.8 2.5 37 TTCSQQQYCTNG 12 None 53.1 0.0 −1.1 16 NNSCTTYTNGSQ 12 None 47.4 0.0 −1.4 113 PVAVALLIAVPP 12  1, 11, 12 57.3 195.0 2.1

3-4-2. Peptides that do not Satisfy the Rigidity/Flexibility

To prove that rigidity/flexibility of the sequence is a crucial critical factor, rigid (Avg. II: 21.8±6.6) and too high flexible sequences (Avg. II: 82.3±21.0) were also designed. Rigid peptides that instability index is much lower than that of new aMTDs (II: 41.3 to 57.3, Avg. II: 53.3±5.7) are shown in Table 17. Bending, but too high flexible peptides that II is much higher than that of new aMTDs are also provided in Table 18.

TABLE 17 Proline Rigidity/ Sturctural Position Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Group rPeptide ID Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) Rigid Peptides 226 ALVAAIPALAIP 12 6 20.4 195.8 2.2 (II < 50) 6 VIAMIPAAFWVA 12 6 15.7 146.7 2.2 750 LALAAIAPLAIP 12 8, 12 22.8 204.2 2.2 26 AAIALAAPLAIV 12 8 18.1 204.2 2.5 527 LVLAAVAPIAIP 12 8, 12 22.8 211.7 2.4 466 IIAAAAPLAIIP 12 7, 12 22.8 204.2 2.3 167 VAIAIPAALAIP 12 6, 12 20.4 195.8 2.3 246 VVAVPLLVAFAA 12 5 25.2 195.0 2.7 426 AAALAIPLAIIP 12 7, 12 43.7 204.2 2.2 606 AAAIAAIPIIIP 12 8, 12 4.4 204.2 2.4 66 AGVLGGPIMGVP 12 7, 12 35.5 121.7 2.3 248 VAAIVPIAALVP 12 6, 12 34.2 203.3 2.5 227 LAAIVPIAAAVP 12 6, 12 34.2 181.5 2.2 17 GGCSAPQTTESN 12 6 51.6 8.3 −0.5 67 LDAEVPLADDVP 12 6, 12 34.2 130.0 0.3

TABLE 18 Proline Rigidity/ Sturctural Position Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Group rPeptide ID Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GARVY) Bending Peptides 692 PAPLPPVVILAV 12 1, 3, 5,6 105.5 186.7 1.8 but Too High 69 PVAVLPPAALVP 12 1, 6, 7, 12 89.4 162.5 1.6 Flexibility 390 VPILVPVVPVVP 12 2, 6, 9, 12 105.4 210.0 2.2 350 VPILVPVVPVVP 12 2, 6, 12 121.5 210.0 2.2 331 VPVLVPLVPVVP 12 2, 6, 9, 12 105.4 210.0 2.2 9 VALVPAALILPP 12 5, 11, 12 89.4 203.3 2.1 68 VAPVLPAAPLVP 12 3, 6, 9, 12 105.5 162 5 1.6 349 VPVLVPVVPVVP 12 2, 6, 9, 12 121.5 201.6 2.2 937 VPVLVPLPVPVV 12 2, 6, 8, 10 121.5 210.0 2.2 938 VPVLLPVVVPVP 12 2, 6, 10, 12 121.5 210.0 2.2 329 LPVLVPVVPVVP 12 2, 6, 9, 12 121.5 210.0 2.2 49 VVPAAPAVPVVP 12 3, 6, 9, 12 121.5 145.8 1.7 772 LPVAPVIPIIVP 12 2, 5, 8, 12 79.9 210.8 2.1 210 ALIALPALPALP 12 6, 9, 12 89.4 195.8 1.8 28 AVPLLPLVPAVP 12 3, 6,9, 12 89.4 186.8 1.8 693 AAPVLPVAVPIV 12 3, 6, 10 82.3 186.7 2.1 169 VALVAPALILAP 12 6, 12 73.4 211.7 2.4 29 VLPPLPVLPVLP 12 3, 4, 6, 9, 12 121.5 202.5 1.7 190 AAILAPAVIAPP 12 6, 11, 12 89.4 163.3 1.8 3-4-3. Peptides that do not Satisfy the Structural Features

New hydrophobic CPPs—aMTDs are consisted with only hydrophobic and aliphatic amino acids (A, V, L, I and P) with average ranges of the indexes—AI: 180 to 220 and GRAVY: 2.1 to 2.6 (Table 9). Based on the structural indexes, the peptides which contain an aromatic residue (W, F or Y) are shown in Table 19 and the peptides which are hydrophobic with non-aromatic sequences but have amino acids residue other than A, V, L, I, P or additional proline residues are designed (Table 20). Finally, hydrophilic and/or bending peptides which are consisted with non-aliphatic amino acids are shown in Table 21.

TABLE 19 Proline Rigidity/ Sturctural Position Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Group rPeptide ID Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) Aromatic Peptides 30 WFFAGPIMLIWP 12 6, 12 9.2 105.8 1.4 (Aromatic Ring 33 AAAILAPAFLAV 12 7 57.3 171.7 2.4 Presences) 131 WIIAPVWLAWIA 12 5 51.6 179.2 1.9 922 WYVIFVLPLVVP 12 8, 12 41.3 194.2 2.2 71 FMWMWFPFMWYP 12 7, 12 71.3 0.0 0.6 921 IWWFVVLPLVVP 12 8, 12 41.3 194.2 2.2

TABLE 20 Proline Rigidity/ Sturctural Position Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Group rPeptide ID Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GARVY) Hydrophobic 436 VVMLVVPAVMLP 12 7, 12 57.3 194.2 2.6 but Non Aromatic 138 PPAALLAILAVA 12 1, 2 57.3 195.8 2.2 Peptides 77 PVALVLVALVAP 12 1, 12 41.3 219.2 2.5 577 MLMIALVPMIAV 12 8 18.9 195.0 2.7 97 ALLAAPPALLAL 12 6, 7 57.3 204.2 2.1 214 ALIVAPALMALP 12 6, 12 60.5 187.5 2.2 59 AVLAAPVVAALA 12 6 41.3 187.5 2.5 54 LAVAAPPVVALL 12 6, 7 57.3 203.3 2.3

TABLE 21 Proline Rigidity/ Sturctural Position Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Group rPeptide ID Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) Hydrophilic 949 SGNSCOOCGNSS 12 None 41.7 0.0 −1.1 Peptides but 39 CYNTSPCTGCCY 12  6 52.5 0.0 0.0 Non Aliphatic 19 YVSCCTYTNGSO 12 None 47.7 0.0 −1.0 947 CYYNOOSNNNNO 12 None 59.6 0.0 −2.4 139 TGSTNSPTCTST 12  7 53.4 0.0 −0.7 18 NYCCTPTINGOS 12  6 47.9 0.0 −0.9 20 NYCNTCPTYGOS 12  7 47.4 0.0 −0.9 635 GSTGGSOONNOY 12 None 31.9 0.0 −1.9 40 TYNTSCTPGTCY 12  8 49.4 0.0 −0.6 57 ONNCHTSSOGGG 12 None 52.4 0.0 −1.6 159 CYSGSTSONOPP 12 11, 12 51.0 0.0 −1.3 700 GTSNTCOSNONS 12 None 19.1 0.0 −1.6 38 YYNOSTCGGOCY 12 None 53.8 0.0 −1.0

3-5. Summary of Newly Designed Peptides

Total of 457 sequences have been designed based on the critical factors. Designed potentially best aMTDs (hydrophobic, flexible, bending, aliphatic and 12-A/a length peptides) that do satisfy all range/feature of critical factors are 316. Designed rPeptides that do not satisfy at least one of the critical factors are 141 that no bending peptide sequences are 26; rigid peptide (II<40) sequences are 23; too much flexible peptides are 24; aromatic peptides (aromatic ring presences) are 27; hydrophobic, but non-aromatic peptides are 23; and hydrophilic, but non-aliphatic peptides are 18.

4. Preparation of Recombinant Report Proteins Fused to aMTDs and rPeptides

Recombinant proteins fused to aMTDs and others [rPeptides, reference hydrophobic CPP sequences (MTM and MTD)] were expressed in a bacterial system, purified with single-step affinity chromatography and prepared as soluble proteins in physiological condition. These recombinant proteins have been tested for the ability of their cell-permeability by utilizing flow cytometry and laser scanning confocal microscopy.

4-1. Selection of Cargo Protein for Recombinant Proteins Fused to Peptide Sequences

For clinical/non-clinical application, aMTD-fused cargo materials would be biologically active molecules that could be one of the following: enzymes, transcription factors, toxic, antigenic peptides, antibodies and antibody fragments. Furthermore, biologically active molecules could be one of these following macromolecules: enzymes, hormones, carriers, immunoglobulin, membrane-bound proteins, transmembrane proteins, internal proteins, external proteins, secreted proteins, virus proteins, native proteins, glycoproteins, fragmented proteins, disulfide bonded proteins, recombinant proteins, chemically modified proteins and prions. In addition, these biologically active molecules could be one of the following: nucleic acid, coding nucleic acid sequence, mRNAs, antisense RNA molecule, carbohydrate, lipid and glycolipid.

According to these pre-required conditions, a non-functional cargo to evaluate aMTD-mediated protein uptake has been selected and called as Cargo A (CRA) that should be soluble and non-functional. The domain (A/a 289 to 840; 184 A/a length) is derived from protein S (Genbank ID: CP000113.1).

4-2. Construction of Expression Vector and Preparation of Recombinant Proteins

Coding sequences for recombinant proteins fused to each aMTD are cloned NdeI (5′) and SalI (3′) in pET-28a(+) (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) from PCR-amplified DNA segments. PCR primers for the recombinant proteins fused to aMTD and rPeptides are represented by SEQ ID NOs: 482 to 798. Structure of the recombinant proteins is displayed in FIG. 1.

The recombinant proteins were forcedly expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells grown to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.6 and induced for 2 hours with 0.7 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). The proteins were purified by Ni²⁺ affinity chromatography as directed by the supplier (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in natural condition. After the purification, purified proteins were dissolved in a physiological buffer such as DMEM medium.

TABLE 22 Potentially Best aMTDs (Hydrophobic, Flexible, Bending, Aliphatic & Helical): 240 Random Peptides: 31 No Bending Peptides (No Proline at 5 or 6 and/or 12): 02 No Bending Peptides (No Central Proline): 01 Rigid Peptides (II < 50): 09 Too Much Flexible Peptides: 09 Aromatic Peptides (Aromatic Ring Presences): 01 Hydrophobic, But Non-Aromatic Peptides: 02 Hydrophilic, But Non-Aliphatic Peptides: 07

4-3. Expression of aMTD- or Random Peptide (rP)-Fused Recombinant Proteins

The present invention also relates to the development method of aMTD sequences having cell-permeability. Using the standardized six critical factors, 316 aMTD sequences have been designed. In addition, 141 rPeptides are also developed that lack one of these critical factors: no bending peptides: i) absence of proline both in the middle and at the end of sequence or ii) absence of proline either in the middle or at the end of sequence, rigid peptides, too much flexible peptides, aromatic peptides (aromatic ring presence), hydrophobic but non-aromatic peptides, and hydrophilic but non-aliphatic peptides (Table 22).

These rPeptides are devised to be compared and contrasted with aMTDs in order to analyze structure/sequence activity relationship (SAR) of each critical factor with regard to the peptides' intracellular delivery potential. All peptide (aMTD or rPeptide)-containing recombinant proteins have been fused to the CRA to enhance the solubility of the recombinant proteins to be expressed, purified, prepared and analyzed.

These designed 316 aMTDs and 141 rPeptides fused to CRA were all cloned (FIG. 2) and tested for inducible expression in E. coli (FIG. 3). Out of these peptides, 240 aMTDs were inducibly expressed, purified and prepared in soluble form (FIG. 4). In addition, 31 rPeptides were also prepared as soluble form (FIG. 4).

To prepare the proteins fused to rPeptides, 60 proteins were expressed that were 10 out of 26 rPeptides in the category of no bending peptides (Table 16); 15 out of 23 in the category of rigid peptides [instability index (H)<40] (Table 17); 19 out of 24 in the category of too much flexible peptides (Table 18); 6 out of 27 in the category of aromatic peptides (Table 19); 8 out of 23 in the category of hydrophobic but non-aromatic peptides (Table 20); and 12 out of 18 in the category of hydrophilic but non-aliphatic peptides (Table 21).

4-4. Quantitative Cell-Permeability of aMTD-Fused Recombinant Proteins

The aMTDs and rPeptides were fluorescently labeled and compared based on the critical factors for cell-permeability by using flow cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (FIGS. 5 to 8). The cellular uptake of the peptide-fused non-functional cargo recombinant proteins could quantitatively be evaluated in flow cytometry, while confocal laser scanning microscopy allows intracellular uptake to be assessed visually. The analysis included recombinant proteins fused to a negative control [rP38] that has opposite characteristics (hydrophilic and aromatic sequence: YYNQSTCGGQCY) to the aMTDs (hydrophobic and aliphatic sequences). Relative cell-permeability (relative fold) of aMTDs to the negative control was also analyzed (Table 23 and FIG. 9).

Table 23 shows the Comparison Analysis of Cell-Permeability of aMTDs with a Negative

Control (A: rP38).

TABLE 23 Negative Control rP38 aMTD 19.6 ± 1.6* The Average of (Best: 164.2) 240 aMTDs *Relative Fold (aMTD in Geo Mean in its comparison to rP38)

Relative cell-permeability (relative fold) of aMTDs to the reference CPPs [B: MTM12 (AAVLLPVLLAAP), C: MTD85 (AVALLILAV)] was also analyzed (Tables 40 and 41)

Table 24 shows Comparison Analysis of Cell-Permeability of aMTDs with a Reference CPP (B: MTM12).

TABLE 24 MTM12 aMTD 13.1 ± 1.1* The Average of (Best: 109.9) 240 aMTDs *Relative Fold (aMTD in Geo Mean in its comparison to MTM12)

Table 25 shows the Comparison Analysis of Cell-Permeability of aMTDs with a Reference CPP (C: MTD85).

TABLE 25 MTD85 aMTD 6.6 ± 0.5* The Average of (Best: 55.5) 240 aMTDs *Relative Fold (aMTD in Geo Mean in its comparison to MTD85)

Geometric means of negative control (histidine-tagged rP38-fused CRA recombinant protein) subtracted by that of naked protein (histidine-tagged CRA protein) lacking any peptide (rP38 or aMTD) was standardized as relative fold of 1. Relative cell-permeability of 240 aMTDs to the negative control (A type) was significantly increased by up to 164 fold, with average increase of 19.6±1.6 (Tables 26 to 31).

TABLE 26 Proline Rigidity/ Sturc- Relative SEQ Posi- Flexi- tural Hydro-  Ratio ID tion bility Feature pathy (Fold) NO aMTD Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) A B C 229 899 AVVIALPAVVAP 12 7 57.3 195.0 2.4 164.2 109.9 55.5 237 908 VALALAPVVVAP 12 7 57.3 195.0 2.3 150.6 100.8 50.9 238 910 VAALLPAVVVAP 12 6 57.3 195.0 2.3 148.5 99.4 50.2 185 810 VIVLAAPALAAP 12 7 50.2 187.5 2.2 120.0 80.3 40.6 233 904 AVLAVVAPVVAP 12 8 57.3 186.7 2.4 105.7 70.8 35.8  74 321 IVAVALPALAVP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 97.8 65.2 32.9 204 851 VLAVVLPAVALP 12 7 57.3 219.2 2.5 96.6 64.7 32.7 239 911 VALALPAVVVAP 12 6 57.3 195.0 2.3 84.8 56.8 28.7 205 852 VLAVAAPAVLLP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.3 84.6 56.6 28.6 179 803 AIALAVPVLALP 12 7 57.3 211.7 2.4 74.7 50.0 25.3 222 888 ILAVVAIPAAAP 12 8 54.9 187.5 2.3 71.0 47.5 24.0 188 825 IVAVIVAPAVAP 12 8 43.2 195.0 2.5 69.7 46.6 23.6 226 895 AIIIVVPAIAAP 12 7 50.2 211.7 2.5 60.8 40.7 20.6 227 896 AILIVVAPIAAP 12 8 50.2 211.7 2.5 57.5 38.5 19.4 164 727 VALAIALPAVLP 12 8 57.3 211.6 2.3 54.7 36.7 18.5 139 603 VLVALAAPVIAP 12 8 57.3 203.3 2.4 54.1 36.1 18.2 200 847 LVAIVVLPAVAP 12 8 50.2 219.2 2.6 50.2 33.4 16.9 189 826 LVALAAPIIAVP 12 7 41.3 211.7 2.4 49.2 32.9 16.6 161 724 VAVLAVLPALAP 12 8 57.3 203.3 2.3 47.5 31.8 16.1 131 563 ALAVIVVPALAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 47.1 31.4 15.9 186 811 AVVLAVPALAVP 12 7 57.3 195.0 2.3 46.5 31.1 15.7 194 831 IIVAVAPAAIVP 12 7 43.2 203.3 2.5 46.3 31.0 15.7 192 829 AALALVAPVIVP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 44.8 30.0 15.2 224 891 ILAVAAIPAALP 12 8 54.9 195.8 2.2 44.7 29.9 15.1 234 905 AVIAVAPLVVAP 12 7 41.3 195.0 2.4 44.0 29.5 14.9 132 564 VAIALIVPALAP 12 8 50.2 211.7 2.4 43.6 29.1 14.7  34 124 IAVALPALIAAP 12 6 50.3 195.8 2.2 43.6 29.0 14.7 190 827 IAAVLAAPALVP 12 8 57.3 187.5 2.2 43.0 28.8 14.6   2   2 AAAVPLLAVVVP 12 5 41.3 195.0 2.4 40.9 27.2 13.8  91 385 IVAIAVPALVAP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.4 38.8 25.9 13.1 191 828 IALLAAPIIAVP 12 7 41.3 220.0 2.4 36.8 24.6 12.4 181 806 LVALAVPAAVLP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.3 36.7 24.6 12.4 198 845 AAVVIAPLLAVP 12 7 41.3 203.3 2.4 35.8 24.0 12.1 218 882 AIALVVPAVAVP 12 7 57.3 195.0 2.4 35.0 23.4 11.8 128 545 VVLVLAAPAAVP 12 8 57.3 195.0 2.3 34.6 23.1 11.7  39 161 AVIALPALIAAP 12 6 57.3 195.8 2.2 34.5 23.0 11.6 110 481 AIAIAIVPVALP 12 8 50.2 211.6 2.4 34.3 23.0 11.6 230 900 ALVAVIAPVVAP 12 8 57.3 195.0 2.4 34.3 22.9 11.6  53 223 AILAVPIAVVAP 12 6 57.3 203.3 2.4 33.0 22.1 11.2 187 824 LIIVAAAPAVAP 12 8 50.2 187.5 2.3 32.8 21.9 11.1 130 562 ALIAAIVPALVP 12 8 50.2 211.7 2.4 32.7 21.8 11.0  52 222 ALLIAPAAVIAP 12 6 57.3 195.8 2.2 32.6 21.7 11.0  17  61 VAALPVLLAALP 12 5 57.3 211.7 2.3 31.2 20.8 10.5 134 582 VAVALIVPALAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 30.6 20.4 10.3 223 889 ILVAAAPIAALP 12 7 57.3 195.8 2.2 30.3 20.3 10.3 177 787 AVALVPVIVAAP 12 6 50.2 195.0 2.4 29.3 19.6 9.9 157 703 IVAVALVPALAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 29.2 19.5 9.9 158 705 IVAVALLPALAP 12 8 50.2 211.7 2.4 28.6 19.1 9.7 220 885 LVAIAPAVAVLP 12 6 57.3 203.3 2.4 28.3 19.0 9.6   3   3 AALLVPAAVLAP 12 6 57.3 187.5 2.1 27.0 18.0 9.1 137 601 AAILIAVPIAAP 12 8 57.3 195.8 2.3 26.8 17.9 9.0 196 843 AVLVLVAPAAAP 12 8 41.3 219.2 2.5 26.4 17.7 8.9  94 403 AAALVIPAAILP 12 7 54.9 195.8 2.2 25.2 16.8 8.5 127 544 IVALIVAPAAVP 12 8 43.1 203.3 2.4 23.4 15.6 7.9 121 522 ALLVIAVPAVAP 12 8 57.3 203.3 2.4 22.7 15.2 7.7

TABLE 27 Proline Rigidity/ Sturc- Relative SEQ Posi- Flexi- tural Hydro- Ratio ID tion bility Feature pathy (Fold) NO aMTD Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) A B C 180 805 LVLIAAAPIALP 12 8 41.3 220.0 2.4 22.3 14.9 7.6 108 464 AVVILVPLAAAP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.4 22.3 14.9 7.5  96 405 LAAAVIPVAILP 12 7 54.9 211.7 2.4 22.2 14.8 7.5 168 747 VALLAIAPALAP 12 8 57.3 195.8 2.2 22.0 14.8 7.5 115 501 VIVALAVPALAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 21.5 14.4 7.3 147 661 AAILAPIVAALP 12 6 50.2 195.8 2.2 21.4 14.3 7.2 176 786 LVAIAPLAVLAP 12 6 41.3 211.7 2.4 21.2 14.2 7.2 144 625 ILAAAAAPLIVP 12 8 50.2 195.8 2.2 20.9 13.9 7.0 101 442 ALAALVPAVLVP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.3 20.4 13.6 6.9 240 912 VALLAPAVVVAP 12 6 57.3 195.0 2.3 19.9 13.3 6.7  43 165 ALAVPVALAIVP 12 5 50.2 203.3 2.4 19.8 13.2 6.7  98 422 VVAILAPLLAAP 12 7 57.3 211.7 2.4 19.6 13.1 6.6 155 686 AALVAVLPVALP 12 8 57.3 203.3 2.3 19.5 13.1 6.6  81 343 IVAVALPALVAP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 19.4 12.9 6.5  76 323 IVAVALPVALAP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 19.1 12.8 6.4 105 461 IAAVIVPAVALP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.4 19.0 12.7 6.4   9  21 AVALLPALLAVP 12 6 57.3 211.7 2.3 18.9 12.6 6.4  95 404 LAAAVIPAAILP 12 7 54.9 195.8 2.2 18.9 12.6 6.4  60 261 LVLVPLLAAAAP 12 5 41.3 211.6 2.3 18.5 12.3 6.2 122 524 AVALIVVPALAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 18.3 12.2 6.2  55 225 VAALLPAAAVLP 12 6 57.3 187.5 2.1 18.3 12.2 6.2  63 264 LAAAPVVIVIAP 12 5 50.2 203.3 2.4 18.2 12.1 6.1   1   1 AAALAPVVLALP 12 6 57.3 187.5 2.1 17.7 11.8 6.0  88 382 AAALVIPAILAP 12 7 54.9 195.8 2.2 17.7 11.8 6.0 107 463 AVAILVPLLAAP 12 7 57.3 211.7 2.4 17.6 11.7 5.9  75 322 VVAIVLPALAAP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 17.6 11.7 5.9 117 503 AAIIIVLPAALP 12 8 50.2 220.0 2.4 17.6 11.8 5.9 211 870 VLVAAVLPIAAP 12 8 41.3 203.3 2.4 16.6 11.1 5.6  56 241 AAAVVPVLLVAP 12 6 57.3 195.0 2.4 16.6 11.0 5.6 163 726 LAVAIIAPAVAP 12 8 57.3 187.5 2.2 16.5 11.0 5.6  79 341 IVAVALPAVLAP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 16.4 10.9 5.5 125 542 ALALIIVPAVAP 12 8 50.2 211.6 2.4 16.2 10.8 5.5  83 361 AVVIVAPAVIAP 12 7 50.2 195.0 2.4 16.0 10.7 5.4  54 224 ILAAVPIALAAP 12 6 57.3 195.8 2.2 15.8 10.6 5.3  20  64 AIVALPVAVLAP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.4 15.8 10.6 5.3 111 482 ILAVAAIPVAVP 12 8 54.9 203.3 2.4 15.8 10.6 5.3 113 484 LAVVLAAPAIVP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 15.6 10.4 5.3 210 868 VLVAAILPAAIP 12 8 54.9 211.7 2.4 14.9 10.0 5.0 124 541 LLALIIAPAAAP 12 8 57.3 204.1 2.1 14.8 9.9 5.0 150 666 AAIAIIAPAIVP 12 8 50.2 195.8 2.3 14.7 9.9 5.0 149 665 LAIVLAAPVAVP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.3 14.7 9.9 5.0  84 363 AVLAVAPALIVP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 14.7 9.8 4.9  57 242 AALLVPALVAAP 12 6 57.3 187.5 2.1 14.6 9.7 4.9  90 384 VIVAIAPALLAP 12 7 50.2 211.6 2.4 14.0 9.4 4.7 214 877 VAIIAVPAVVAP 12 7 57.3 195.0 2.4 14.0 9.4 4.7 206 863 AAVVLLPIIAAP 12 7 41.3 211.7 2.4 13.8 9.3 4.7 123 525 ALAIVVAPVAVP 12 8 50.2 195.0 2.4 13.8 9.2 4.7 213 875 AIAIVVPAVAVP 12 7 50.2 195.0 2.4 13.8 9.2 4.7  69 285 AIVLLPAAVVAP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.4 13.3 8.9 4.5  65 281 ALIVLPAAVAVP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.4 13.3 8.9 4.5 209 867 ALLVVIAPLAAP 12 8 41.3 211.7 2.4 13.2 8.8 4.4 172 766 IVVIAVAPAVAP 12 8 50.2 195.0 2.4 12.9 8.6 4.4  80 342 VIVALAPAVLAP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 12.7 8.5 4.3 217 881 AALIVVPAVAVP 12 7 50.2 195.0 2.4 12.7 8.5 4.3 119 505 AIIIVIAPAAAP 12 8 50.2 195.8 2.3 12.4 8.3 4.2

TABLE 28 Proline Rigidity/ Sturc- Relative SEQ Posi- Flexi- tural Hydro- Ratio ID tion bility Feature pathy (Fold) NO aMTD Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) A B C 169 763 VAVLIAVPALAP 12 8 57.3 203.3 2.3 12.3 7.2 4.2 156 687 AILAVALPLLAP 12 8 57.3 220.0 2.3 12.0 7.0 4.1 159 706 IVAVALLPAVAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 12.0 7.0 4.1 145 643 LALVLAAPAIVP 12 8 50.2 211.6 2.4 11.8 7.9 4.0  66 282 VLAVAPALIVAP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.4 11.8 7.9 4.0 126 543 LLAALIAPAALP 12 8 57.3 204.1 2.1 11.7 7.8 4.0  78 325 IVAVALPAVALP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 11.7 7.8 4.0 199 846 IAVAVAAPLLVP 12 8 41.3 203.3 2.4 11.7 6.8 4.0  89 383 VIVALAPALLAP 12 7 50.2 211.6 2.3 11.6 7.7 3.9  87 381 VVAIVLPAVAAP 12 7 50.2 195.0 2.4 11.5 7.7 3.9 183 808 LVVLAAAPLAVP 12 8 41.3 203.3 2.3 11.5 7.6 3.9 208 865 AVLVIAVPAIAP 12 8 57.3 203.3 2.5 11.3 7.5 3.8 162 725 IAVLAVAPAVLP 12 8 57.3 203.3 2.3 11.2 7.5 3.8 197 844 VVALLAPLIAAP 12 7 41.3 211.8 2.4 11.2 7.5 3.8 228 897 AVIVPVAIIAAP 12 5 50.2 203.3 2.5 11.2 7.5 3.8 141 605 VIAAVLAPVAVP 12 8 57.3 195.0 2.4 11.0 7.4 3.7 166 744 AAVVIVAPVALP 12 8 50.2 195.0 2.4 11.0 7.3 3.7  51 221 AAILAPIVALAP 12 6 50.2 195.8 2.2 10.9 7.3 3.7 142 622 ALIVLAAPVAVP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 10.6 7.1 3.6  92 401 AALAVIPAAILP 12 7 54.9 195.8 2.2 10.6 7.1 3.6  77 324 IVAVALPAALVP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 10.3 6.9 3.5 215 878 IVALVAPAAVVP 12 7 50.2 195.0 2.4 10.3 6.9 3.5  71 302 LALAPALALLAP 12 5 57.3 204.2 2.1 10.2 6.8 3.4 154 685 ALLVAVLPAALP 12 8 57.3 211.7 2.3 10.2 5.9 3.4 201 848 AVAIVVLPAVAP 12 8 50.2 195.0 2.4 10.0 6.7 3.4 138 602 VIVALAAPVLAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 9.9 5.8 3.4 178 788 AIAVAIAPVALP 12 8 57.3 187.5 2.3 9.8 6.6 3.3  38 145 LLAVVPAVALAP 12 6 57.3 203.3 2.3 9.5 6.3 3.2   6  11 VVALAPALAALP 12 6 57.3 187.5 2.1 9.5 6.3 3.2  35 141 AVIVLPALAVAP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.4 9.4 6.3 3.2 120 521 LAALIVVPAVAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 9.4 6.3 3.2 100 425 AVVAIAPVLALP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.4 9.4 6.3 3.2  86 365 AVIVVAPALLAP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 9.3 6.2 3.1  62 263 ALAVIPAAAILP 12 6 54.9 195.8 2.2 9.0 6.0 3.0  82 345 ALLIVAPVAVAP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 8.9 5.9 3.0 203 850 LVIALAAPVALP 12 8 57.3 211.7 2.4 8.8 5.9 3.0  37 144 VLAIVPAVALAP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.4 8.8 5.9 3.0 173 767 IVVAAVVPALAP 12 8 50.2 195.0 2.4 8.5 5.0 2.9  47 185 AALVLPLIIAAP 12 6 41.3 220.0 2.4 8.5 5.7 2.9 202 849 AVILLAPLIAAP 12 7 57.3 220.0 2.4 8.3 4.8 2.8  40 162 AVVALPAALIVP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.4 8.2 5.5 2.8 207 864 ALLVIAPAIAVP 12 7 57.3 211.7 2.4 8.2 4.8 2.8  42 164 LAAVLPALLAAP 12 6 57.3 195.8 2.1 8.2 5.5 2.8 236 907 VAIALAPVVVAP 12 7 57.3 195.0 2.4 8.1 5.4 2.8 103 444 LAAALVPVALVP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.3 8.1 5.4 2.7 102 443 ALAALVPVALVP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.3 8.0 5.3 2.7 221 887 VLAVAPAVAVLP 12 6 57.3 195.0 2.4 7.7 5.1 2.6 231 901 ALVAVLPAVAVP 12 7 57.3 195.0 2.4 7.7 5.1 2.6 167 746 VAIIVVAPALAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 7.6 4.4 2.6 232 902 ALVAPLLAVAVP 12 5 41.3 203.3 2.3 7.6 5.1 2.6 133 565 VAIVLVAPAVAP 12 8 50.2 195.0 2.4 7.5 5.0 2.5  59 245 AAALAPVLALVP 12 6 57.3 187.5 2.1 7.5 5.0 2.5 165 743 AIAIALVPVALP 12 8 57.3 211.6 2.4 7.4 4.9 2.5 109 465 AVVILVPLAAAP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.4 7.4 4.9 2.5  30 104 AVVAAPLVLALP 12 6 41.3 203.3 2.3 7.3 4.9 2.5

TABLE 29 Proline Rigidity/ Sturc- Relative SEQ Posi- Flexi- tural Hydro- Ratio ID tion bility Feature pathy (Fold) NO aMTD Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) A B C 160 707 IVALAVLPAVAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 7.3 4.9 2.5 212 872 VLAAAVLPLVVP 12 8 41.3 219.2 2.5 7.3 4.9 2.5 135 583 AVILALAPIVAP 12 8 50.2 211.6 2.4 7.3 4.8 2.4 216 879 AAIVLLPAVVVP 12 7 50.2 219.1 2.5 7.2 4.8 2.4 175 784 VAALPAVALVVP 12 5 57.3 195.0 2.4 7.1 4.7 2.4 225 893 VIAIPAILAAAP 12 5 54.9 195.8 2.3 7.0 4.7 2.4   8  13 AAALVPVVALLP 12 6 57.3 203.3 2.3 7.0 4.7 2.4 184 809 LIVLAAPALAAP 12 7 50.2 195.8 2.2 7.0 4.7 2.4 104 445 ALAALVPALVVP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.3 6.9 4.6 2.3  22  81 AALLPALAALLP 12 5 57.3 204.2 2.1 6.9 4.6 2.3 151 667 LAVAIVAPALVP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.3 6.9 4.6 2.3 235 906 AVIALAPVVVAP 12 7 57.3 195.0 2.4 6.8 4.6 2.3 112 483 ILAAAIIPAALP 12 8 54.9 204.1 2.2 6.8 4.5 2.3 114 485 AILAAIVPLAVP 12 8 50.2 211.6 2.4 6.8 4.5 2.3  97 421 AAILAAPLIAVP 12 7 57.3 195.8 2.2 6.7 4.5 2.3 136 585 ALIVAIAPALVP 12 8 50.2 211.6 2.4 6.6 4.4 2.2  99 424 AVVVAAPVLALP 12 7 57.3 195.0 2.4 6.6 4.4 2.2  85 364 LVAAVAPALIVP 12 7 50.2 203.3 2.3 6.5 4.3 2.2  93 402 ALAAVIPAAILP 12 7 54.9 195.8 2.2 6.4 4.3 2.2 106 462 IAAVLVPAVALP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.4 6.3 4.2 2.1  64 265 VLAIAPLLAAVP 12 6 41.3 211.6 2.3 6.0 4.0 2.0  70 301 VIAAPVLAVLAP 12 6 57.3 203.3 2.4 6.0 4.0 2.0  45 183 LLAAPVVIALAP 12 6 57.3 211.6 2.4 6.0 4.0 2.0  58 243 AAVLLPVALAAP 12 6 57.3 187.5 2.1 5.9 3.9 2.0 148 664 ILIAIAIPAAAP 12 8 54.9 204.1 2.3 5.7 3.8 1.9 174 783 IVALVPAVAIAP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.5 5.7 3.8 1.9 116 502 AIVALAVPVLAP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 5.6 3.7 1.9  61 262 ALIAVPAIIVAP 12 6 50.2 211.6 2.4 5.5 3.7 1.9 152 683 LAIVLAAPAVLP 12 8 50.2 211.7 2.4 5.5 3.2 1.9 193 830 IALVAAPVALVP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.4 5.3 3.5 1.8 170 764 AVALAVLPAVVP 12 8 57.3 195.0 2.3 5.0 3.4 1.7 182 807 AVALAVPALVLP 12 7 57.3 203.3 2.3 5.0 3.3 1.7  46 184 LAAIVPAIIAVP 12 6 50.2 211.6 2.4 4.8 3.2 1.6  73 305 IALAAPILLAAP 12 6 57.3 204.2 2.2 4.8 3.2 1.6  27 101 LVALAPVAAVLP 12 6 57.3 203.3 2.3 4.5 3.0 1.5  72 304 AIILAPIAAIAP 12 6 57.3 204.2 2.3 4.4 3.0 1.5 140 604 VALIAVAPAVVP 12 8 57.3 195.0 2.4 4.3 2.5 1.5 146 645 ALAVVALPAIVP 12 8 50.2 203.3 2.4 4.3 2.9 1.5  48 201 LALAVPALAALP 12 6 57.3 195.8 2.1 4.2 2.8 1.4  41 163 LALVLPAALAAP 12 6 57.3 195.8 2.1 4.1 2.4 1.4 195 832 AVAAIVPVIVAP 12 7 43.2 195.0 2.5 4.1 2.7 1.4  44 182 ALIAPVVALVAP 12 6 57.3 203.3 2.4 4.0 2.7 1.4  11  23 VVLVLPAAAAVP 12 6 57.3 195.0 2.4 4.0 2.6 1.3  31 105 LLALAPAALLAP 12 6 57.3 204.1 2.1 4.0 2.6 1.3 129 561 AAVAIVLPAVVP 12 8 50.2 195.0 2.4 3.9 2.6 1.3 171 765 AVALAVVPAVLP 12 8 57.3 195.0 2.3 3.8 2.2 1.3 153 684 AAIVLALPAVLP 12 8 50.2 211.7 2.4 3.5 2.1 1.2  36 143 AVLAVPAVLVAP 12 6 57.3 195.0 2.4 3.3 2.2 1.1 118 504 LIVALAVPALAP 12 8 50.2 211.7 2.4 3.3 2.2 1.1  10  22 AVVLVPVLAAAP 12 6 57.3 195.0 2.4 3.1 2.1 1.1   5   5 AAALLPVALVAP 12 6 57.3 187.5 2.1 3.1 2.1 1.0  67 283 AALLAPALIVAP 12 6 50.2 195.8 2.2 3.1 2.0 1.0  21  65 IAIVAPVVALAP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.4 3.0 2.0 1.0 219 883 LAIVPAAIAALP 12 6 50.2 195.8 2.2 3.0 2.0 1.0  33 123 AAIIVPAALLAP 12 6 50.2 195.8 2.2 2.9 2.0 1.0

TABLE 30 Proline Rigidity/ Sturc- Relative SEQ Posi- Flexi- tural Hydro- Ratio ID tion bility Feature pathy (Fold) NO aMTD Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) A B C  68 284 ALIAPAVALIVP 12 5 50.2 211.7 2.4  2.8  1.8 0.9  50 205 ALALVPAIAALP 12 6 57.3 195.8 2.2  2.6  1.7 0.9  14  42 VAALPVVAVVAP 12 5 57.3 186.7 2.4  2.5  1.7 0.8  32 121 AIVALPALALAP 12 6 50.2 195.8 2.2  2.5  1.7 0.8  13  25 IVAVAPALVALP 12 6 50.2 203.3 2.4  2.4  1.6 0.8  12  24 IALAAPALIVAP 12 6 50.2 195.8 2.2  2.3  1.6 0.8  49 204 LIAALPAVAALP 12 6 57.3 195.8 2.2  2.2  1.5 0.8   7  12 LLAAVPAVLLAP 12 6 57.3 211.7 2.3  2.2  1.5 0.7  15  43 LLAAPLVVAAVP 12 5 41.3 187.5 2.1  2.1  1.4 0.7  29 103 ALIAAPILALAP 12 6 57.3 204.2 2.2  2.1  1.4 0.7  23  82 AVVLAPVAAVLP 12 6 57.3 195.0 2.4  2.1  1.4 0.7   4   4 ALALLPVAALAP 12 6 57.3 195.8 2.1  2.0  1.3 0.7  26  85 LLVLPAAALAAP 12 5 57.3 195.8 2.1  1.9  1.3 0.7  19  63 AALLVPALVAVP 12 6 57.3 203.3 2.3  1.9  1.3 0.7  16  44 ALAVPVALLVAP 12 5 57.3 203.3 2.3  1.6  1.1 0.5  25  84 AAVAAPLLLALP 12 6 41.3 195.8 2.1  1.5  1.0 0.5  18  62 VALLAPVALAVP 12 6 57.3 203.3 2.3  1.4  0.9 0.5  24  83 LAVAAPLALALP 12 6 41.3 195.8 2.1  1.4  0.9 0.5  28 102 LALAPAALALLP 12 5 57.3 204.2 2.1  1.4  0.9 0.5 143 623 VAAAIALPAIVP 12 8 50.2 187.5 2.3  0.8  0.6 0.3 19.6 ± 13.1 ± 6.6 ±  1.6  1.1 0.5

Moreover, compared to reference CPPs (B type: MTM12 and C type: MTD85), novel 240 aMTDs averaged of 13±1.1 (maximum 109.9) and 6.6±0.5 (maximum 55.5) fold higher cell-permeability, respectively (Tables 26 to 31).

TABLE 31 Negative Control rP38 MTM12 MTD85 aMTD 19.6 ± 1.6* 13.1 ± 1.1* 6.6 ± 0.5* The Average (Best: 164.2) (Best: 109.9) (Best: 55.5) of 240 aMTDs *Relative Fold (aMTD in Geo Mean in its comparison to rP38, MTM12 or MTD85)

In addition, cell-permeabilities of 31 rPeptides have been compared with that of 240 aMTDs (0.3±0.04; Tables 32 and 33).

TABLE 32 Proline Rigidity/ Relative Sequence Posi- Flexi- Sturctural Hydro- Ratio to ID rPeptide tion bility Feature pathy aMTD Number ID Sequences Length (PP) (II) (AI) (GRAVY) AVE 875 692 PAPLPPVVILAV 12  1, 105.5 186.7  1.8 0.74  3,  5,  6 863  26 AAIALAAPLAIV 12  8  18.1 204.2  2.5 0.65 859 113 PVAVALLIAVPP 12  1,  57.3 195.0  2.1 0.61 11, 12 865 466 IIAAAAPLAIIP 12  7,  22.8 204.2  2.3 0.52 12 866 167 VAIAIPAALAIP 12  6,  20.4 195.8  2.3 0.50 12 904  97 ALLAAPPALLAL 12  6,  57.3 204.2  2.1 0.41  7 877 390 VPLLVPVVPVVP 12  2, 105.4 210.0  2.2 0.41  6,  9, 12 868 426 AAALAIPLAIIP 12  7,   4.37 204.2  2.2 0.40 12 905 214 ALIVAPALMALP 12  6,  60.5 187.5  2.2 0.33 12 881  68 VAPVLPAAPLVP 12  3, 105.5 162.5  1.6 0.32  6,  9, 12 909  39 CYNTSPCTGCCY 12  6  52.5   0.0  0.0 0.29 856 934 LILAPAAVVAAA 12  5  57.3 195.8  2.5 0.28 884 938 VPVLLPVVVPVP 12  2, 121.5 210.0  2.2 0.28  6, 10, 12 885 329 LPVLVPVVPVVP 12  2, 121.5 210.0  2.2 0.23  6,  9, 12 869 606 AAAIAAIPIIIP 12  8,   4.4 204.2  2.4 0.20 12 886  49 VVPAAPAVPVVP 12  3, 121.5 145.8  1.7 0.18  6,  9, 12 912 139 TGSTNSPTCTST 12  7  53.4   0.0 −0.7 0.17 887 772 LPVAPVIPIIVP 12  2,  79.9 210.8  2.1 0.16  5,  8, 12 899 921 IWWFVVLPLVVP 12  8,  41.3 194.2  2.2 0.14 12 870  66 AGVLGGPIMGVP 12  7,  35.5 121.7  1.3 0.13 12 890 693 AAPVLPVAVPIV 12  3,  82.3 186.7  2.1 0.13  6, 10 913  18 NYCCTPTTNGQS 12  6  47.9   0.0 −0.9 0.10 858  16 NNSCTTYTNGSQ 12 None  47.4   0.0 −1.4 0.08 872 227 LAAIVPIAAAVP 12  6,  34.2 187.5  2.2 0.08 12 873  17 GGCSAPQTTCSN 12  6  51.6   8.3 −0.5 0.08 874  67 LDAEVPLADDVP 12  6,  34.2 130  0.3 0.08 12 915 635 GSTGGSQQNNQY 12 None  31.9   0.0 −1.9 0.07 892  29 VLPPLPVLPVLP 12  3, 121.5 202.5  1.7 0.07  4,  6,  9, 12 917  57 QNNCNTSSQGGG 12 None  52.4   0.0 −1.6 0.06 919 700 GTSNTCQSNQNS 12 None  19.1   0.0 −1.6 0.05 920  38 YYNQSTCGGQCY 12 ND  53.8   0.0 −1.0 0.05 AVE 0.3 ± 0.04

TABLE 33 Relative Ratio to aMTD AVE* rPeptide 0.3 ± 0.04 The Average of 31 aMTDs *Out of 240 aMTDs, average relative fold of aMTD had been 19.6 fold compared to type A (rP38).

In summary, relatively cell-permeability of aMTDs has shown maximum of 164.0, 109.9 and 55.5 fold higher to rP38, MTM12 and MTD85, respectively. In average of total 240 aMTD sequences, 19.6±1.6, 13.1±1.1 and 6.6±0.5 fold higher cell-permeability are shown to the rP38, MTM12 and MTD85, respectively (Tables 26 to 31). Relative cell-permeability of negative control (rP38) to the 240 aMTDs is only 0.3±0.04 fold.

4-5. Intracellular Delivery and Localization of aMTD-Fused Recombinant Proteins

Recombinant proteins fused to the aMTDs were tested to determine their intracellular delivery and localization by laser scanning confocal microscopy with a negative control (rP38) and previous published CPPs (MTM12 and MTD85) as the positive control references. NIH3T3 cells were exposed to 10 uM of FITC-labeled protein for 1 hour at 37° C., and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Then, cells were examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (FIG. 7). Recombinant proteins fused to aMTDs clearly display intracellular delivery and cytoplasmic localization (FIG. 7) that are typically higher than the reference CPPs (MTM12 and MTD85). The rP38-fused recombinant protein did not show internalized fluorescence signal (FIG. 7a ). In addition, as seen in FIG. 8, rPeptides (his-tagged CRA recombinant proteins fused to each rPeptide) display lower- or non-cell-permeability.

4-6. Summary of Quantitative and Visual Cell-Permeability of Newly Developed aMTDs

Histidine-tagged aMTD-fused cargo recombinant proteins have been greatly enhanced in their solubility and yield. Thus, FITC-conjugated recombinant proteins have also been tested to quantitate and visualize intracellular localization of the proteins and demonstrated higher cell-permeability compared to the reference CPPs.

In the previous studies using the hydrophobic signal-sequence-derived CPPs—MTS/MTM or MTDs, 17 published sequences have been identified and analyzed in various characteristics such as length, molecular weight, pI value, bending potential, rigidity, flexibility, structural feature, hydropathy, amino acid residue and composition, and secondary structure of the peptides. Based on these analytical data of the sequences, novel artificial and non-natural peptide sequences designated as advanced MTDs (aMTDs) have been invented and determined their functional activity in intracellular delivery potential with aMTD-fused recombinant proteins.

aMTD-fused recombinant proteins have promoted the ability of protein transduction into the cells compared to the recombinant proteins containing rPeptides and/or reference hydrophobic CPPs (MTM12 and MTD85). According to the results, it has been demonstrated that critical factors of cell-penetrating peptide sequences play a major role to determine peptide-mediated intracellular delivery by penetrating plasma membrane. In addition, cell-permeability can considerably be improved by following the rational that all satisfy the critical factors.

5. Structure/Sequence Activity Relationship (SAR) of aMTDs on Delivery Potential

After determining the cell-permeability of novel aMTDs, structure/sequence activity relationship (SAR) has been analyzed for each critical factor in selected some of and all of novel aMTDs (FIGS. 13 to 16 and Table 34).

TABLE 34 Rank of Rigidity/ Sturctural Relative Delivery Flexibility Feature Hydropathy Ratio (Fold) Amino Acid Composition Potential (II) (AI) (GRAVY) A B C A V I L  1~10 55.9 199.2 2.3 112.7 75.5 38.1 4.0 3.5 0.4 2.1 11~20 51.2 205.8 2.4 56.2 37.6 19.0 4.0 2.7 1.7 1.6 21~30 49.1 199.2 2.3 43.6 28.9 14.6 4.3 2.7 1.4 1.6 31~40 52.7 201.0 24 34.8 23.3 11.8 4.2 2.7 1.5 1.6 41~50 53.8 201.9 2.3 30.0 20.0 10.1 4.3 2.3 1.1 2.3 51~60 51.5 205.2 2.4 23.5 15.7 7.9 4.4 2.1 1.5 2.0 222~231 52.2 197.2 2.3 2.2 1.5 0.8 4.5 2.1 1.0 2.4 232~241 54.1 199.7 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.6 4.6 1.7 0.2 3.5

5-1. Proline Position:

In regards to the bending potential (proline position: PP), aMTDs with its proline at 7′ or 8′ amino acid in their sequences have much higher cell-permeability compared to the sequences in which their proline position is at 5′ or 6′ (FIGS. 14a, 14b, 15a and 15b ).

5-2. Hydropathy:

In addition, when the aMTDs have GRAVY (Grand Average of Hydropathy) ranging in 2.1 to 2.2, these sequences display relatively lower cell-permeability, while the aMTDs with 2.3 to 2.6 GRAVY are shown significantly higher one (FIGS. 14b, 15b, 15c and 15d ).

5-3. rPeptide SAR:

To the SAR of aMTDs, rPeptides have shown similar SAR correlations in the cell-permeability, pertaining to their proline position (PP) and hydropathy (GRAVY). These results confirm that rPeptides with high GRAVY (2.4 to 2.6) have better cell-permeability (FIG. 16).

5-4. Analysis of Amino Acid Composition:

In addition to proline position and hydropathy, the difference of amino acid composition is also analyzed. Since aMTDs are designed based on critical factors, each aMTD-fused recombinant protein has equally two proline sequences in the composition. Other hydrophobic and aliphatic amino acids—alanine, isoleucine, leucine and valine—are combined to form the rest of aMTD peptide sequences.

Alanine: In the composition of amino acids, the result does not show a significant difference by the number of alanine in terms of the aMTD's delivery potential because all of the aMTDs have three to five alanines. However, four alanine compositions show the most effective delivery potential (geometric mean) (FIG. 13a ).

Leucine and Isoleucine: Also, the compositions of isoleucine and leucine in the aMTD sequences show inverse relationship between the number of amino acid (I and L) and delivery potential of aMTDs. Lower number of isoleucine and leucine in the sequences tends to have higher delivery potential (geometric mean) (FIGS. 13a to 13b ).

Valine: Conversely, the composition of valine of aMTD sequences shows positive correlation with their cell-permeability. When the number of valine in the sequence is low, the delivery potential of aMTD is also relatively low (FIG. 13b ).

Ten aMTDs having the highest cell-permeability are selected (average geometric mean: 2584±126). Their average number of valine in the sequences is 3.5; 10 aMTDs having relatively low cell-permeability (average geometric mean: 80±4) had average of 1.9 valine amino acids. The average number of valine in the sequences is lowered as their cell-permeability is also lowered as shown in FIG. 13b . Compared to higher cell-permeable aMTDs group, lower sequences had average of 1.9 in their valine composition. Therefore, to obtain high cell-permeable sequence, an average of 2-4 valines should be composed in the sequence.

5-5. Conclusion of SAR Analysis:

As seen in FIG. 15, all 240 aMTDs have been examined for these association of the cell-permeability and the critical factors: bending potential (PP), rigidity/flexibility (II), structure feature (AI), and hydropathy (GRAVY), amino acid length and composition. Through this analysis, cell-permeability of aMTDs tends to be lower when their central proline position is at 5′ or 6′ and GRAVY is 2.1 or lower (FIG. 15). Moreover, after investigating 10 higher and 10 lower cell-permeable aMTDs, these trends are clearly shown to confirm the association of cell-permeability with the central proline position and hydropathy.

6. Experimental Confirmation of Index Range/Feature of Critical Factors

The range and feature of five out of six critical factors have been empirically and experimentally determined that are also included in the index range and feature of the critical factors initially proposed before conducting the experiments and SAR analysis. In terms of index range and feature of critical factors of newly developed 240 aMTDs, the bending potential (proline position: PP), rigidity/flexibility (Instability Index: II), structural feature (Aliphatic Index: AI), hydropathy (GRAVY), amino acid length and composition are all within the characteristics of the critical factors derived from analysis of reference hydrophobic CPPs.

Therefore, our hypothesis to design and develop new hydrophobic CPP sequences as advanced MTDs is empirically and experimentally proved and demonstrated that critical factor-based new aMTD rational design is correct.

TABLE 35 Summarized Critical Factors of aMTD Newly Analysis of Experi- Designed mental Critical Factor CPPs Range Results Range Bending Potential Proline presences Proline presences (Proline Position: PP) in the middle in the middle (5′, 6′, 7′ or 8') and (5′, 6′, 7′ or 8′) and at the end of at the end of peptides peptides Rigidity/Flexibility 40-60 41.3-57.3 (Instability Index: II) Structural Feature 180-220 187.5-220.0 (Aliphatic Index: AI) Hydropathy 2.1-2.6 2.2-2.6 (Grand Average of Hydropathy GRAVY) Length  9-13 12 (Number of Amino Acid) Amino acid A, V, I, L, P A, V, I, L, P Composition 7. Discovery and Development of Protein-Based New Biotherapeutics with MITT Enabled by aMTDs for Protein Therapy

240 aMTD sequences have been designed and developed based on the critical factors. Quantitative and visual cell-permeability of 240 aMTDs (hydrophobic, flexible, bending, aliphatic and 12 a/a-length peptides) are all practically determined.

To measure the cell-permeability of aMTDs, rPeptides have also been designed and tested. As seen in FIGS. 13a to 15d , there are vivid association of cell-permeability and the critical factors of the peptides. Out of these critical factors, we are able to configure that the most effective cell-permeable aMTDs have the amino acid length of 12; composition of A, V, L, I and P; multiple proline located at either 7′ or 8′ and at the end (12′); instability index ranged of 41.3 to 57.3; aliphatic index ranged of 187.5 to 220.0; and hydropathy (GRAVY) ranged of 2.2 to 2.6.

These examined critical factors are within the range that we have set for our critical factors; therefore, we are able to confirm that the aMTDs that satisfy these critical factors have relatively high cell-permeability and much higher intracellular delivery potential compared to reference hydrophobic CPPs reported during the past two decades.

It has been widely evident that many human diseases are caused by proteins with deficiency or over-expression that causes mutations such as gain-of-function or loss-of-function. If biologically active proteins could be delivered for replacing abnormal proteins within a short time frame, possibly within an hour or two, in a quantitative manner, the dosage may be regulated depending on when and how proteins may be needed. By significantly improving the solubility and yield of novel aMTD in present invention (Table 31), one could expect its practical potential as an agent to effectively deliver therapeutic macromolecules such as proteins, peptides, nucleic acids, and other chemical compounds into live cells as well as live mammals including human. Therefore, newly developed MITT utilizing the pool (240) of novel aMTDs can be used as a platform technology for discovery and development of protein-based biotherapeutics to apprehend intracellular protein therapy after determining the optimal cargo-aMTD relationship.

8. Novel Hydrophobic CPPs—aMTDs for Development of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins

8-1. Selection of aMTD for Cell-Permeability

From 240 aMTDs and, 2 aMTDs were selected and used for the construction of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins. 2 aMTDs used are shown in the following Table 36.

Various hydrophobic CPPs—aMTDs have been used to enhance the delivery of cargo proteins (BMP2 or BMP7) to mammalian cells and tissues.

TABLE 36 Amino Acid SEQ ID NO aMTD ID Sequences 12  24 IALAAPALIVAP 33 123 AAIIVPAALLAP

8-2. Selection of Solubilization Domain (SD) for Structural Stability

Recombinant cargo protein (BMP2 or BMP7) fused to hydrophobic CPP could be expressed in bacteria system, purified with single-step affinity chromatography, but protein dissolved in physiological buffers (e.g. PBS, DMEM or RPMI1640 etc.) was highly insoluble and had extremely low yield as a soluble form. Therefore, an additional non-functional protein domain (solubilization domain: SD) has been applied to fuse with the recombinant protein for improving the solubility, yield and eventually cell and tissue permeability.

According to the specific aim, the selected domains are SDA to SDF (Table 37). The aMTD/SD-fused BMP2/7 recombinant proteins have been determined for their stability.

The solubilization domains (SDs) and aMTDs have greatly influenced in increasing solubility/yield and cell-/tissue-permeability of the protein. Therefore, we have developed highly soluble and highly stable BMP2/7 recombinant protein fused with SD(s) (SDA, SDB or/and SDC) and aMTDs.

Table 37 shows the Characteristics of Solubilization Domains.

TABLE 37 Genbank Protein Instability SD ID Origin (kDa) pI Index (II) GRAVY A CP000113.1 Bacteria 23 4.6 48.1 −0.1 B BC086945.1 Rat 11 4.9 43.2 −0.9 C CP012127.1 Human 12 5.8 30.7 −0.1 D CP012127.1 Bacteria 23 5.9 26.3 −0.1 E CP011550.1 Human 11 5.3 44.4 −0.9 F NG_034970 Human 34 7.1 56.1 −0.2

8-3. Construction of Expression Vector

BMP2 and BMP7 are synthesized as pre-pro peptides consisting of a signal peptide (SP), latency associated peptide (LAP) and mature peptide (MP). After the synthesis, SP and LAP are later processed by enzymatic cleavage, where the C-terminal mature domain is released and secreted (FIG. 17). In one embodiment of the present invention, BMP2 and BMP7 may be prepared an L form consisting of LAP and MP, and an M form consisting of only MP. 16 different types of recombinant protein with or without the aMTD and solubilization domains (SDs) for BMP2/7 were designed.

BMP2 recombinant protein structures for M form were labeled as follows: (2M-1) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, (2M-2) a BMP2 fused with His-tag and aMTD, (2M-3) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDA, (2M-3C) a BMP2 fused with His-tag and SDA, (2M-4) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDB, and (2M-4C) a BMP2 fused with His-tag and SDB, and BMP7 recombinant protein structures for M form were labeled as follows: (7M-1) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, (7M-2) a BMP7 fused with His-tag and aMTD, (7M-3) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDA, (7M-3C) a BMP7 fused with His-tag and SDA, (7M-4) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDB, and (7M-4C) a BMP7 fused with His-tag and SDB (FIG. 18a ). Among them, (2/7M-3) and (2/7M-4) structures were used as candidate proteins having the biological efficacy of CP-BMP recombinant protein, and (2/7M-1), (2/7M-2), (2/7M-3C) and (2/7M-4C) were used as control groups (Non-CP-BMP) with respect to (2/7M-3) and (2/7M-4).

BMP2 recombinant protein structures for L form were labeled as follows: (2L-1) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, (2L-2) a BMP2 fused with His-tag and aMTD, (2L-3) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDA, (2L-4) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDB, (2L-5) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, aMTD and two SDB, (2L-5C) a BMP2 fused with His-tag and two SDB, (2L-6) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, aMTD, SDA and SDB, (2L-6C) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, SDA and SDB, (2L-7) a BMP2 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDC, and (2L-7C) a BMP2 fused with His-tag and SDC, and BMP7 recombinant protein structure for L form were labeled as follows: (7L-1) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, (7L-2) a BMP7 fused with His-tag and aMTD, (7L-3) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDA, (7L-4) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDB, (7L-5) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, aMTD and two SDB, (7L-5C) a BMP7 fused with His-tag and two SDB, (7L-6) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, aMTD, SDA and SDB, (7L-6C) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, SDA and SDB, (7L-7) a BMP7 fused with His-tag, aMTD and SDC, and (7L-7C) a BMP7 fused with His-tag and SDC (FIGS. 18b and 23b ). Among them, (2/7L-3), (2/7L-4), (2/7L-5), (2/7L-6) and (2/7L-7) structures were used as candidate proteins having the biological efficacy of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant protein, and (2/7L-1), (2/7L-2), (2/7L-5C), (2/7L-6C) and (2/7L-7C) were used as control groups (Non-CP-BMP) with respect to (2/7L-3), (2/7L-4), (2/7L-5), (2/7L-6) and (2/7L-7). 8-4. Preparation of BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins The BMP2/7 recombinant proteins were successfully induced by adding IPTG and purified. The solubility and yield of the BMP2/7 recombinant proteins were determined.

The solubility and yields of BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins fused with SD (2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4) were significant increased, which compared to a BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins without SDs (2/7M-1 and 2/7M-2) (FIGS. 20a and 20b ). The solubility and yields of BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant proteins fused with SDs (2/7L-5 and 2/7L-6) were significant increased, which BMP (L form) recombinant proteins without SD (L-1 and L-2) or with SDs (2/7L-3, 2/7L-4 and 2/7L-7) (FIGS. 20a, 20b, 23a and 23b ). The results suggested that the BMP2/7 recombinant proteins fused with SDA or/and SDB displayed a significant improvement of solubility and yields.

Taken together, since L form consisting of LAP and MP has a larger size than M form consisting of MP, the BMP recombinant proteins fused with same aMTD and SD may be different cell-permeability depending on L form or M form. BMP requires MP to act on cells, and therefore, in this experiment, BMP recombinant protein consisting of MP (BMP (M form) recombinant protein) was used.

9. Determination of Cell-Permeability of BMP2/7 (M Form) Recombinant Proteins

The cell-permeability of the BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins was investigated. BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins were labeled fluorescence dye, FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate), then cell permeability of the BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins was evaluated in RAW 264.7 cells and NIH3T3 cells. The RAW 264.7 cells and the NIH3T3 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 500 mg/mL of 5% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S). The RAW 264.7 cells analyzed by FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) showed a gain in fluorescence, indicative of the presence of FITC-labeled BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins as compared with control that only FITC or vehicle (diluent). For FACS analysis, cells (1×10⁴) were analyzed using a CellQues Pro cytometric analysis software (FACS Calibur, Beckton-Dickinson, San Diego Calif., USA). The cell-permeability of aMTD/SD-fused BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins was examined, respectively (FIG. 24).

In the NIH3T3 cells, the cell-permeability and intracellular localization of the fluorescent signal was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM700, Zeiss, Germany; FIG. 25). The intracellular localization of the fluorescent signal was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy and by Nomarski interference microscope image of the same cells (LSM700, Zeiss, Germany). These results suggest that the BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant protein attaching aMTD is enhanced its cell-permeability and therefore, aMTD is critical for systemic delivery of the protein in vitro.

Accordingly, BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2M-3, 7M-3, 2M-4 and 7M-4) having superior cell permeability were selected as candidates with biological efficacy (cell-permeability BMP2/7 recombinant protein, CP-BMP2/7).

10. Determination of Tissue-Permeability of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins

Tissue-permeability of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins was investigated by intraperitoneal injection of a FITC-labeled aMTD/SD-fused BMP2/7 recombinant protein into ICR mouse. Tissues obtained from each organ (brain, heart, lung, liver, spleen and kidney) after the injection of the protein show that the aMTD-fused CP-BMP2/7 recombinant protein is delivered into each organ (FIG. 26). Thus, these results suggest that the CP-BMP2/7 recombinant protein attaching aMTD is enhanced its tissue-permeability and therefore, aMTD is critical for systemic delivery of the protein in vivo.

11. Determination of Biological Activity of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins In Vitro

To investigate biological activity of the CP-BMP2/7 recombinant protein, MC3T3-E1 cell (preosteoblast), C3H10T-1/2 cell (multiple mesenchymal stem cell) and C2C12 cell (myoblast) were examined for osteogenic differentiation in vitro.

11-1. Inhibition of Myotube Formation

C2C12 myoblasts are known to differentiate into myotubes under the starvation condition (<2% of FBS or horse serum in media), and the treatment of BMPs suppress myogenesis and lead to osteogenesis (FIG. 40a ). To examine the effect of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins on the osteogenic differentiation, the C2C12 cells incubated with various dose of the CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins in serum free condition for 2 hours, and continuously exposed in 2% FBS media for 7 days (FIG. 27). These results suggest that the CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins inhibit myotube formation of the C2C12 cells.

11-2. Activation of Smad Signaling Pathway

To confirm biological activity of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins, the activation of Smad-signaling was investigated. For starvation of cells, confluent C2C12 cells were incubated with serum free DMEM media, and then 10 uM of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins were separately treated for 15 minutes. The cells were lysed, and Smad phosphorylation was examined (FIG. 28). Further, C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were treated with the BMP2/7 recombinant proteins, and activation of Smad-signaling was examined in the cells. These results indicate that the CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins activate Smad.

11-3. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Activity

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is a widely accepted bone marker and activated by BMP stimulation. To confirm biological activity of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins, ALP activity of the MC3T3-E1 cells was investigated (FIG. 29). Further, C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells and C2C12 cells were treated with the BMP2/7 recombinant proteins, and ALP activity was examined in the cells. These results indicate that the CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins increase ALP activity.

11-4. Combinational Treatment of CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 Recombinant Proteins

Synergistic effect of CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 recombinant proteins on osteogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts was evaluated with inhibition effect of myotube formation and ALP activity (FIGS. 30 and 31). Further, C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were treated with the BMP2 or CP-BMP7 recombinant protein, and ALP activity was examined in the cells. These results indicate that combination treatment of the CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 recombinant proteins remarkably increase alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression and significantly inhibit myotube formation, compared to single treatment of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins.

12. Determination of Biological Activity of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins In Vivo

To investigate the effect of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins on new bone formation of calvaria in vivo, CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins were locally injected to defected calvaria of mouse by subcutaneous injection. After 4 weeks, new bone formation was determined by using H&E staining (FIGS. 32 and 33). These results indicate that the CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins activate differentiation of osteoblast to form new bone.

13. Determination of Optimal aMTD for CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein

13-1. Selection of aMTD for Cell-Permeability

To improve cell-permeability and activity of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins fused with different aMTDs were prepared (FIG. 34). From 240 aMTDs, 17 aMTDs were selected and used for the construction of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins. 17 aMTDs used are shown in the following Table 38. However, the aMTD₄₈₁-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was not prepared.

TABLE 38 Amino Acid SEQ ID NO aMTD ID Sequences   1   1 AAALAPVVLALP   3   3 AALLVPAAVLAP  17  61 VAALPVLLALP  34 124 IAVALPALIAAP  74 321 IVAVALPALAVP  91 385 IVAIAVPALVAP  94 403 AAALVIPAAILP 101 442 ALAALVPAVLVP 110 481 AIAIAIVPVALP 131 563 ALAVIVVPALAP 136 585 ALIVAIAPALVP 139 603 VLVALAAPVIAP 143 623 VAAAIALPAIVP 200 847 LVAIVVLPAVAP 228 897 AVIVPVAIIAAP 229 899 AVVIALPAVVAP

13-2. Preparation of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins

The 12 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins with the aMTD and SD were successfully induced by adding IPTG and purified (FIGS. 35a and 35b ). These results indicate that different aMTDs-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins expressed, and have high solubility and yield. However, the aMTD₁, aMTD₈₄₇ or aMTD₈₉₉-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was not expressed.

13-3. Determination of Cell-Permeability of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins

The cell-permeability of the 13 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins was investigated (FIGS. 36a and 36b ). These results indicate that 13 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein have high cell-permeability.

13-4. Determination of Biological Activity of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins

The biological activity of the 4 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins was investigated (FIG. 37). ALP activity of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins was determined in C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells (FIG. 37). The 4 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins are each CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins fused with aMTD₂₄, aMTD₄₄₂, aMTD₅₆₃ and aMTD₆₂₃. Further, C2C12 myoblasts and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were treated with the 4 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and ALP activity was examined in the cells. These results indicate that the aMTD₄₄₂-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant protein has the most excellent ALP activity.

In conclusion, CP-BMP2 recombinant protein attaching aMTD₄₄₂ having the excellent cell permeability was determined as an optimal CP-BMP2 recombinant protein.

14. Determination of Cell-Permeability of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins

The cell-permeability of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein attaching aMTD₄₄₂ was investigated (FIGS. 38 and 39). These results suggest that the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein attaching aMTD₄₄₂ is enhanced its cell-permeability and therefore, aMTD₄₄₂ is critical for systemic delivery of the BMP.

15. Determination of Biological Activity of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein In Vitro

To reinvestigate the biological activity of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein which showed excellent effects on bone formation or regeneration, osteogenic differentiation was examined in vitro.

C2C12 myoblasts were treated with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and inhibition of myotube formation in the cells was observed (FIG. 40b ). C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells were treated with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and ALP activity of the cells was examined (FIG. 41). Further, C2C12 myoblasts and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were treated with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and inhibition of myotube formation and ALP activity were examined in the cells.

These results suggest that the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein has excellent ability of osteogenic differentiation.

16. Determination of Mechanism of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein

To investigate the mechanism of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, C2C12 myoblasts were treated with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and then signal intensity of Smad was examined (FIG. 42). Further, the C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were treated with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and then signal intensity of Smad was examined in the cells. As a result, strong Smad activity was observed in the cells treated with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2), compared to the cells treated with the BMP2 recombinant protein lacking aMTD (Non-CP-BMP2).

To investigate why the Smad signal induced by the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein is stronger than that of the control protein (Non-CP-BMP2), binding of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein and BMP2 receptor was examined in MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts (FIG. 43). Further, the C2C12 myoblasts and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were treated with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and then signal intensity of Smad was examined in the cells. As a result, since the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins permeating cells strongly bind to BMP receptors in intracellular ER (Endoplasmic reticulum) and golgi, strong Smad activity by the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was observed.

17. Determination of Effect of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein In Vivo

To investigate the effect of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins on new bone formation, the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins were locally injected to calvaria of mouse by subcutaneous injection. After 4 weeks, new bone formation was determined by using H&E staining (FIGS. 44a and 44b ).

To investigate the effect of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins on bone regeneration, calvarial critical-sized defect model was designed in mouse. The CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins were locally injected to defected calvaria of mouse by subcutaneous injection. After 8 weeks, new bone formation was determined by using H&E staining (FIGS. 45a and 45b ). Effective administration conditions of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein for bone regeneration were determined by changing administration frequency and dose of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (FIGS. 46a, 46b, 47a and 47b ).

To investigate the effect of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins on bone regeneration, equine bone defect model was designed in horse (FIG. 49b ). The CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins showed in FIG. 48 were locally injected to defected hind limb of horses by subcutaneous injection. After 9 weeks, new bone formation was determined by using CT (FIGS. 48a, 49b and 50).

As a result, it was confirmed that the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein activated differentiation of osteoblast, leading to effective regeneration of defected bone, suggesting that the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein exhibits excellent effects on recovery of defected bone.

18. Determination of Toxicity of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein

To investigate toxicity of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein in vivo, a toxicity assay was performed. In a single dose acute toxicity assay, a high concentration of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was intravenously administered to a mouse once, and the toxicity assay was performed for 2 weeks (FIG. 51). In a repeated dose toxicity assay, different concentrations of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein were intravenously administered to a mouse once daily, and the toxicity assay was performed for 2 weeks (FIGS. 52a and 52b ). As a result, even though high concentrations of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein were administered, no toxicity was observed.

19. Determination of Pharmacokinetics of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein

To determinate of pharmacokinetics of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins, CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was labeled with FITC.

30 mg/kg of FITC-labeled CP-BMP2 recombinant protein were intravenously administered to mouse. At each time point, PBMCs were separated from the blood and splenocytes were separated from the spleen of the mouse. The CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins were measured in the PBMCs and splenocytes (FIG. 53). Further, the blood that separated from mouse and the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein were mixed, and the concentration of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was measured at each time point (FIG. 54). As a result, it was confirmed that the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was stably maintained in the blood for a long period of time.

15 mg/kg of FITC-labeled CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins were subcutaneously injected into the calvarial bone of mouse, and FITC signals expressed in the calvarial bone of the mouse were measured at each time point (FIG. 55). As a result, it was confirmed that the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was maintained in the blood and organ for a long period of time. These results suggest that the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein may exist in vivo for a long period of time, and the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein may also maintain its effect persistently.

The following examples are presented to aid practitioners of the invention, to provide experimental support for the invention, and to provide model protocols. In no way are these examples to be understood to limit the invention.

Example 1. Development of Novel Advanced Macromolecule Transduction Domain

(aMTD)

H-regions of signal sequences (HOURSP)-derived CPPs (MTS/MTM and MTD) do not have a common sequence, a sequence motif, and/or a common structural homologous feature. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the aim is to develop improved hydrophobic CPPs formatted in the common sequence and structural motif that satisfy newly determined ‘critical factors’ to have a ‘common function,’ to facilitate protein translocation across the plasma membrane with similar mechanism to the analyzed CPPs.

The structural motif as follows:

wherein X(s) refers to Alanine (A), Valine (V), Leucine (L) or Isoleucine (I); one of U refers to proline and the other U(s) refer to A, V, L or I; and P refers to proline.

In Table 9, universal common sequence/structural motif is provided as follows. The amino acid length of the peptides according to one embodiment of the present invention ranges from 9 to 13 amino acids, mostly 12 amino acids, and their bending potentials are dependent with the presence and location of proline in the middle of sequence (at 5′, 6′, 7′ or 8′ amino acid) and at the end of peptide (at 12′) for recombinant protein bending. Instability index (II) for rigidity/flexibility of aMTDs is II<40, grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) for hydropathy is around 2.2, and aliphatic index (AI) for structural features is around 200 (Table 9). Based on these standardized critical factors, new hydrophobic peptide sequences, namely advanced macromolecule transduction domain peptides (aMTDs), according to one embodiment of the present invention have been developed and summarized in Tables 10 to 15.

Example 2. Construction of Expression Vectors for Recombinant Proteins Fused to aMTDs

Our newly developed technology has enabled us to expand the method for making cell-permeable recombinant proteins. The expression vectors were designed for histidine-tagged CRA proteins fused with aMTDs or rPeptides. To construct expression vectors for recombinant proteins, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had been devised to amplify each designed aMTD or rPeptide fused to CRA.

The PCR reactions (100 ng genomic DNA, 10 pmol each primer, each 0.2 mM dNTP mixture, 1× reaction buffer and 2.5 U Pfu(+) DNA polymerase (Doctor protein, Korea) was digested on the restriction enzyme site between Nde I (5′) and Sal I (3′) involving 35 cycles of denaturation (95° C.), annealing (62° C.), and extension (72° C.) for 30 seconds each. For the last extension cycle, the PCR reactions remained for 5 minutes at 72° C. Then, they were cloned into the site of pET-28a(+) vectors (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). DNA ligation was performed using T4 DNA ligase at 4° C. overnight. These plasmids were mixed with competent cells of E. coli DH5-alpha strain on the ice for 10 minutes. This mixture was placed on the ice for 2 minutes after it was heat shocked in the water bath at 42° C. for 90 seconds. Then, the mixture added with LB broth media was recovered in 37° C. shaking incubator for 1 hour. Transformant was plated on LB broth agar plate with kanamycin (50 ug/mL) (Biopure, Johnson City, Tenn., USA) before incubating at 37° C. overnight. From a single colony, plasmid DNA was extracted, and after the digestion of Nde I and Sal I restriction enzymes, digested DNA was confirmed at 645 bp by using 1.2% agarose gels electrophoresis (FIG. 2). PCR primers for the CRA recombinant proteins fused to aMTD and random peptides (rPeptide) are summarized in Tables 23 to 30. Amino acid sequences of aMTD and rPeptide primers are shown in Tables 31 to 38.

Example 3. Inducible Expression, Purification and Preparation of Recombinant

Proteins Fused to aMTDs and rPeptides

To express recombinant proteins, pET-28a(+) vectors for the expression of CRA proteins fused to a negative control [rPeptide 38 (rP38)], reference hydrophobic CPPs (MTM₁₂ and MTD₈₅) and aMTDs were transformed in E. coli BL21(DE3) strains. Cells were grown at 37° C. in LB medium containing kanamycin (50 ug/mL) with a vigorous shaking and induced at OD₆₀₀=0.6 by adding 0.7 mM IPTG (Biopure) for 2 hours at 37° C. Induced recombinant proteins were loaded on 15% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (InstantBlue, Expedeon, Novexin, UK) (FIG. 3).

The E. coli cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was re-suspended in the lysis buffer (50 mM NaH₂PO₄, 10 mM Imidazol, 300 mM NaCl, pH 8.0). The cell lysates were sonicated on ice using a sonicator (Sonics and Materials, Inc., Newtown, Conn., USA) equipped with a probe. After centrifuging the cell lysates at 8,000 rpm for 10 minutes to pellet the cellular debris, the supernatant was incubated with lysis buffer-equilibrated Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) gently by open-column system (Bio-rad, Hercules, Calif., USA). After washing protein-bound resin with 200 mL wash buffer (50 mM NaH₂PO₄, 20 mM Imidazol, 300 mM NaCl, pH 8.0), the bounded proteins were eluted with elution buffer (50 mM NaH₂PO₄, 250 mM Imidazol, 300 mM NaCl, pH 8.0).

Recombinant proteins purified under natural condition were analyzed on 15% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (FIG. 4). All of the recombinant proteins were dialyzed for 8 hours and overnight against physiological buffer, a 1:1 mixture of cell culture medium (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium: DMEM, Hyclone, Logan, Utah, USA) and Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS, Gibco, Grand Island, N.Y., USA). From 316 aMTDs and 141 rPeptides cloned, 240 aMTD- and 31 rPeptide-fused recombinant proteins were induced, purified, prepared and analyzed for their cell-permeability.

Example 4. Determination of Quantitative Cell-Permeability of Recombinant

Proteins

For quantitative cell-permeability, the aMTD- or rPeptide-fused recombinant proteins were conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA). RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 10 uM FITC-labeled recombinant proteins for 1 hour at 37° C., washed three times with cold PBS, treated with 0.25% tripsin/EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) for 20 minutes at 37° C. to remove cell-surface bound proteins. Cell-permeability of these recombinant proteins were analyzed by flow cytometry (Guava, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) using the FlowJo cytometric analysis software (FIGS. 5 to 6). The relative cell-permeability of aMTDs were measured and compared with the negative control (rP38) and reference hydrophobic CPPs (MTM12 and MTD85) (Table 31).

Example 5. Determination of Cell-Permeability and Intracellular Localization of

Recombinant Proteins

For a visual reference of cell-permeability, NIH3T3 cells were cultured for 24 hours on coverslip in 24-wells chamber slides, treated with 10 uM FITC-conjugated recombinant proteins for 1 hour at 37° C., and washed three times with cold PBS. Treated cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Junsei, Tokyo, JP) for 10 minutes at room temperature, washed three times with PBS, and mounted with VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium (Vector laboratories, Burlingame, Calif., USA), and counter stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). The intracellular localization of the fluorescent signal was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM700, Zeiss, Germany; FIGS. 7 and 8).

Example 6. Expression of BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins

<6-1> Construction of Expression Vectors for BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins

Full-length cDNA for human BMP2 (RC214586) and BMP7 (RC203813) were purchased from Origene. Our newly developed technology, aMTD-based MITT, has enabled us to improve the method for developing cell-permeable recombinant proteins. The expression vectors were designed for BMP2/7 (M Form) recombinant proteins fused with aMTD/SD (2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4) and control proteins without aMTD- or/and SD (2/7M-1, 2/7M-2, 2/7M-3C and 2/7M-4C), and BMP2/7 (L Form) recombinant proteins fused with aMTD/SD (2/7L-3 and 2/7L-4) and control proteins without aMTD or/and SD (2/7L-1, 2/7L-2, 2/7M-3C and 2/7M-4C).

To acquire expression vectors for BMP2/7 recombinant proteins, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had been devised to amplify these recombinant proteins. The PCR reactions (100 ng genomic DNA, 10 pmol each primer, each 0.2 mM dNTP mixture, 1× reaction buffer and 2.5 U Pfu(+) DNA polymerase (Doctor Protein, Korea) was digested on the different restriction enzyme site involving 40 cycles of denaturation (95° C.), annealing (58° C.), and extension (72° C.) for 30 seconds each. For the last extension cycle, the PCR reactions remained for 10 minutes at 72° C. Then, they were cloned into the site of pET-28a(+) vectors (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). DNA ligation was performed using T4 DNA ligase (NEB, USA) at 4° C. overnight. These plasmids were mixed with competent cells of E. coli (BL21(DE3) codon plus RIL) strain (ATCC, USA) on the ice for 10 minutes. This mixture was placed on the ice for 2 minutes after it was heat-shocked in the water bath at 42° C. for 90 seconds. Then, the mixture added with LB broth media (ELPIS, Korea) was recovered in 37° C. shaking incubator for 1 hour. Transformant was plated on LB broth agar plate with kanamycin (50 ug/mL). From a single colony, plasmid DNA was extracted, and after the digestion of BamHI and HindIII restriction enzymes (NEB, USA), digested DNA was confirmed by using 1.2% agarose gels electrophoresis (FIGS. 19a to 19d ). PCR primers for the His-tagged (or not His-tagged) BMP recombinant proteins fused to aMTD and SD are summarized in Table 39 to 42.

As shown in FIGS. 19a to 19d , respective BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant expression vectors were expressed respective BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2/7M-1, 2/7M-2, 2/7M-3, 2/7M-3C, 2/7M-4 and 2/7M-4C), and respective BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant expression vectors were expressed respective BMP2/7 recombinant protein (2/7L-1, 2/7L-2, 2/7L-3 and 2/7L-4).

TABLE 39 Clone Abbrevi- ID ation Primer Sequence (5′→3′) 2M-1 HB2M Forward ATTTATCATATGCAAGCCAAACACAAA CAGCGG Reverse GGTATTGGATCCCTAGCGACACCCACA 2M-2 HM₂₄B2M Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGTGATTGTGGCGCCGCAAGCCA AACACAAACAGCGG Reverse GGTATTGGATCCCTAGCGACACCCACA 2M-3 HM₂₄B2MSA Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGTGATTGTGGCGCCGCAAGCCA AACACAAACAGCGG Reverse TATGTTGGATCCGTAGCGACACCCACA Forward CCCGGATCCATGCAAATATTACCGTTT TCTATAACGAA Reverse CGCGTCGACTTACCTCGGCTGCACCGG CACGGAGATGAC 2M-3C HB2MSA Forward ATTTATCATATGCAAGCCAAACACAAA CAGCGG Reverse CGCGTCGACTTACCTCGGCTGCACCGG CACGGAGATGAC 2M-4 HM₂₄B2MSB Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGTGATTGTGGCGCCGCAAGCCA AACACAAACAGCGG Reverse TATGTTGGATCCGTAGCGACACCCACA Forward CCCGGATCCATGGCAGAACAAAGCGAC AAGGATGTGAAG Reverse CGCGTCGACTTAAAGGGTTTCCGAAGG CTTGGCTATCTT 2M-4C HB2MSB Forward ATTTATCATATGCAAGCCAAACACAAA CAGCGG Reverse CGCGTCGACTTAAAGGGTTTCCGAAGG CTTGGCTATCTT

TABLE 40 Clone Abbrevi- ID ation Primer Sequence (5′→3′) 7M-1 HB7M Forward ATTTATCATATGACGCCCAAGAACCAG GAAGCC Reverse ATAAATGGATCCCTAGTGGCAGCCACA 7M-2 HM₂₄B7M Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGCCGACGCCC AAGAACCAGGAAGCC Reverse ATAAATGGATCCCTAGTGGCAGCCACA 7M-3 HM₂₄B7MSA Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGCCGACGCCC AAGAACCAGGAAGCC Reverse ATAAATGGATCCCTAGTGGCAGCCACA Forward CCCGGATCCATGCAAATATTACCGTTT TCTATAACGAA Reverse CGCGTCGACTTACCTCGGCTGCACCGG CACGGAGATGAC 7M-3C HB7MSA Forward ATTTATCATATGACGCCCAAGAACCAG GAAGCC Reverse CGCGTCGACTTACCTCGGCTGCACCGG CACGGAGATGAC 7M-4 HM₂₄B7MSB Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGCCGACGCCC AAGAACCAGGAAGCC Reverse ATAAATGGATCCCTAGTGGCAGCCACA Forward CCCGGATCCATGGCAGAACAAAGCGAC AAGGATGTGAAG Reverse CGCGTCGACTTAAAGGGTTTCCGAAGG CTTGGCTATCTT 7M-4C HB7MSB Forward ATTTATCATATGACGCCCAAGAACCAG GAAGCC Reverse CGCGTCGACTTAAAGGGTTTCCGAAGG CTTGGCTATCTT

TABLE 41 Clone Abbrevi- ID ation Primer Sequence (5′→3′) 2L-1 HB2L Forward ATTTATCATATGCTCGTTCCGGAGCTG GGCCGC Reverse GGTATTGGATCCCTAGCGACACCCACA 2L-2 HM₂₄B2L Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGCCGCTCGTT CCGGAGCTGGGCCGC Reverse GGTATTGGATCCCTAGCGACACCCACA 2L-3 HM₂₄B2LSA Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGCCGCTCGTT CCGGAGCTGGGCCGC Reverse TATGTTGGATCCGTAGCGACACCCACA Forward CCCGGATCCATGCAAATATTACCGTTT TCTATAACGAA Reverse CGCGTCGACTTACCTCGGCTGCACCGG CACGGAGATGAC 2L-4 HM₂₄B2LSB Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGCCGCTCGTT CCGGAGCTGGGCCGC Reverse TATGTTGGATCCGTAGCGACACCCACA Forward CCCGGATCCATGGCAGAACAAAGCGAC AAGGATGTGAAG Reverse CGCGTCGACTTAAAGGGTTTCCGAAGG CTTGGCTATCTT

TABLE 42 Clone Abbrevi- ID ation Primer Sequence (5′→3′) 7L-1 HB7L Forward ATTTATCATATGTCCGCCCTGGCCGAC TTCAGC Reverse ATAAATGGATCCCTAGTGGCAGCCACA 7L-2 HM₂₄B7L Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGCCGTCCGCC CTGGCCGACTTCAGC Reverse GGTATTGGATCCCCTAGCGACACCCAC A 7L-3 HM₂₄B7LSA Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGCCGTCCGCC CTGGCCGACTTCAGC Reverse ATAAATGGATCCCTAGTGGCAGCCACA Forward CCCGGATCCATGCAAATATTACCGTTT TCTATAACGAA Reverse CGCGTCGACTTACCTCGGCTGCACCGG CACGGAGATGAC 7M-4 HM₂₄B7LSB Forward ATTTATCATATGATTGCGCTGGCGGCG CCGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGCCGTCCGCC CTGGCCGACTTCAGC Reverse ATAAATGGATCCCTAGTGGCAGCCACA Forward CCCGGATCCATGGCAGAACAAAGCGAC AAGGATGTGAAG Reverse CGCGTCGACTTAAAGGGTTTCCGAAGG CTTGGCTATCTT

<6-2> Expression and Purification of Histidine-tagged BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins

E. coli containing the recombinant expression vectors was incubated within 1 mL of LB medium at 37° C. overnight, and then inoculated in 700 mL of LB medium, followed by incubation at 37° C., until OD₆₀₀ reached 0.5 to 0.7 mM of isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) as a protein expression inducer was added to this culture medium, and then further incubated at 37° C. for 3 hours. This culture medium was centrifuged at 4° C. and 8,000 rpm for 15 minutes, and a supernatant was discarded to recover a cell pellet. The cell pellet thus recovered was suspended in a lysis buffer (50 mM NaH₂PO₄, 300 mM NaCl, pH 8.0), and then cells were disrupted by sonication. The cells were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes to obtain an insoluble fraction containing recombinant proteins. Denatured recombinant proteins were lysed using denature lysis buffer (8 M Urea, 10 mM Tris, 100 mM NaH₂PO₄) and purified by adding Ni-NTA resin. Resin bound to proteins were washed 3 times with 30 mL of denature washing buffer (8 M Urea, 10 mM Tris, 20 m imidazole, 100 mM NaH₂PO₄). BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2/7M-1, 2/7M-2, 2/7M-3, 2/7M-3C, 2/7M-4, 2/7M-4C, 2/7L-1, 2/7L-2, 2/7L-3 and 2/7L-4) were eluted 3 times with 30 mL of denature elution buffer (8 M Urea, 10 mM Tris, 250 mM imidazole). After purification, they were dialyzed twice against a refolding buffer (550 mM Guanidine-HCl, 440 mM L-Arginine, 50 mM Tris, 100 mM NDSB, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM reduced glutathione and 0.2 mM oxidized glutathione). Finally, they were dialyzed against a physiological buffer such as DMEM at 4° C. until the dialysis was over 300×10⁵ times. Concentration of purified proteins was quantified using Bradford assay according to the manufacturer's instructions. After purification, they were dialyzed against DMEM as indicated above. Finally, SDS-PAGE analysis of cell lysates before (−) and after (+) IPTG induction; aliquots of Ni²⁺ affinity purified BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (P); and molecular weight standards (M) were conducted to confirm the presence of target protein.

<6-3> Determination of Solubility/Yield of BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins

The aMTD-fused BMP2/7 recombinant proteins containing SDA or SDB are cloned, expressed, purified, and prepared in a soluble form under the denatural condition. Each BMP2/7 recombinant protein fused to aMTD and/or SD (2/7M-1, 2/7M-2, 2/7M-3, 2/7M-4, 2/7L-1, 2/7L-2, 2/7L-3 and 2/7L-4) was determined for their size (number of amino acids), yield (mg/L) and solubility on 10% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Solubility was scored on a 5-point scale ranging from highly soluble proteins with little tendency to precipitate (+++++) to largely insoluble proteins (+) by measuring their turbidity (A450). Yield (mg/L) in physiological buffer condition of each recombinant protein was also determined. The cell-permeable BMP2/7 recombinant proteins were observed as a single band, where the amount of the final purified protein was up to 10 mg/mL in this protein purification procedure. As shown in FIGS. 20a and 20b , each type of BMP2/7 recombinant proteins were successfully expressed and purified. The solubility and yield of 2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4 were significantly increased compared to control protein (2/7M-1 and 2/7M-2). In contrast, 2/7L-3 and 2/7L-4 showed lower solubility and yield than 2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4, and little solubility, like the control proteins (2/7L-1 and 2/7L-2).

Example 7. Expression of New BMP2/7 (L form) Recombinant Proteins

To solve the problem with low solubility and yields of BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant protein, the type of aMTD and location of SD were changed in the aMTD/SD-fused BMP2/7 recombinant proteins. The expression vectors were designed for BMP2/7 (L Form) recombinant proteins fused with aMTD/SD (2/7L-5, 2/7L-6 and 2/7L-7) and control proteins without aMTD (2/7L-5C, 2/7L-6C and 2/7L-7C). In the same manner as in Example 6, the recombinant expression vectors prepared by using primers described in Tables 43 and 44 were identified by gel electrophoresis, and each of the BMP recombinant proteins were expressed and purified from each of the recombinant expression vectors, and solubility and yield were measured.

PCR primers for the His-tagged (or not His-tagged) BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant proteins fused to aMTD and SD are summarized in Tables 43 and 44.

As shown in FIG. 22, the respective BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant expression vectors were expressed respective BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant proteins (2/7L-5, 2/7L-5C, 2/7L-6, 2/7L-6C, 2/7L-7 and 2/7L-7C).

TABLE 43 Clone Abbrevi- ID ation Primer Sequence (5′→3′) 2L-5 HSBB2LSBM₁₂₃ Forward TCTTGTCATATGGCAGAACAAAG CGACAAG Reverse TAAGTTGCGGCCGCTTACGCCAG CAGCGCCGCCGGCACAATAATCG CCGCCGGAAGGGTTTTCCGAAGG 2L-5C HSBB2LSB Forward TCTTGTCATATGGCAGAACAAAG CGACAAG Reverse AATAACGCGGCCGCTTAAAAGGG TTTCCGAAGG 2L-6 HSAB2LSBM₁₂₃ Forward GGGTTTCATATGATGGCAAATAT TACCGTTTTC Reverse TAAGTTGCGGCCGCTTACGCCAG CAGCGCCGCCGGCACAATAATCG CCGCCGGAAGGGTTTTCCGAAGG 2L-6C HSAB2LSB Forward GGGTTTCATATGATGGCAAATAT TACCGTTTTC Reverse AATAACGCGGCCGCTTAAAAGGG TTTCCGAAGG 2L-7 SCHB2LM₁₂₃ Forward AATATAGGATCCCTCGTTCCGGA GCTGGGC Reverse TAAGTTGCGGCCGCTTACGCCAG CAGCGCCGCCGGCACAATAATCG CCGCCGGAAGGGTTTTCCGAAGG 2L-7C SCHB2L Forward AATATAGGATCCCTCGTTCCGGA GCTGGGC Reverse GTATTGGTCGACTTAGCGACACC CACAACC

TABLE 44 Clone Abbrevi- ID ation Primer Sequence (5′→3′) 7L-5 HSBB7LSBM₁₂₃ Forward TCTTGTCATATGGCAGAACAAAG CGACAAG Reverse TAAGTTGCGGCCGCTTACGCCAG CAGCGCCGCCGGCACAATAATCG CCGCCGGAAGGGTTTTCCGAAGG 7L-5C HSBB7LSB Forward TCTTGTCATATGGCAGAACAAAG CGACAAG Reverse AATAACGCGGCCGCTTAAAGGGT TTTCCGAAGG 7L-6 HSAB7LSBM₁₂₃ Forward GGGTTTCATATGATGGCAAATAT TACCGTTTTC Reverse TAAGTTGCGGCCGCTTACGCCAG CAGCGCCGCCGGCACAATAATCG CCGCCGGAAGGGTTTTCCGAAGG 7L-6C HSAB7LSB Forward GGGTTTCATATGATGGCAAATAT TACCGTTTTC Reverse AATAACGCGGCCGCTTAAAGGGT TTTCCGAAGG 7L-7 SCHB7LM₁₂₃ Forward AATGATGGATCCTCCGCCCTGGC CGACTTC Reverse TAAGTTGCGGCCGCTTACGCCAG CAGCGCCGCCGGCACAATAATCG CCGCCGGAAGGGTTTTCCGAAGG 7L-7C SCHB7L Forward AATGATGGATCCTCCGCCCTGGC CGACTTC Reverse TAATATGTCGACTTAGTGGCAGC CACAGGC

As shown in FIGS. 23a and 23b , each type of BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant proteins were successfully expressed and purified. 2L-5, 7L-5, 2L-6 and 7L-6 were successfully expressed and purified with significantly improved solubility and yield. But, 2L-7 and 7L-7 showed very limited solubility and yield. These results demonstrate that the combinational fusion of SDA and/or SDB to BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant proteins significantly improve their solubility, while SDC fused BMP2/7 (L form) recombinant proteins showed indifference.

Example 8. Determination of Cell-Permeability of BMP2/7 Recombinant Protein

Because we first secured full set of purified BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins, BMP2/7 (M form) recombinant proteins were used for further investigations including cell-/tissue-permeability and biological activity.

For quantitative cell-permeability, 50 ul of 0.1 M sodium carbonate (Biosesang) was added to the each 10 mL of 10 uM aMTD/SD-fused BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2/7M-1, 2/7M-2, 2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4), vehicle or FITC only. 50 ul/mL of 10 uM fluorescein isothiocynate (FITC, Sigma, F7250) was added, and left in a 4° C. shaker overnight. The FITC-aMTD/SD-fused BMP2/7 recombinant proteins were put in a dialysis membrane (Thermo), and 1 L of buffer was added thereto. For 2/7M-1, DMEM was used as a buffer, and for 2/7M-2, 2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4, saline (0.9% sodium chloride) was used as a buffer. The membranes were incubated on a 4° C. stir plate for 3 hours. The buffer was changed, followed by further incubation for 3 hours. The buffer was changed again, followed by overnight incubation. The buffer was changed again, followed by incubation for 2 hours. The proteins were filtered using a 0.2 urn syringe filter, and then aliquoted and stored at −70° C. before use.

RAW 264.7 cells (ATCC, USA) were treated with 10 uM of the FITC-labeled BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2/7M-1, 2/7M-2, 2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4) for 1 hour at 37° C., washed three times with cold PBS, treated with proteinase K (10 ug/mL) for 20 minutes at 37° C. to remove cell-surface bound proteins and subjected to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (FACSCalibur; BD, Franklin Lakes, N.J.).

As shown in FIG. 24, the aMTD/SD-fused CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4) exhibited superior cell permeability, compared to the BMP2/7 recombinant proteins lacking aMTD or SD (2/7M-1 and 2/7M-2). In particular, 2M-4 and 7M-4 were found to have the highest cell permeability.

For a visual reference of cell-permeability, NIH3T3 cells (ATCC, USA) were cultured for 24 hours on a coverslip in 24-wells chamber slides, treated with 10 uM of vehicle (culture medium, DMEM), FITC only or FITC-conjugated BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2/7M-1, 2/7M-2, 2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4) for 1 hour at 37° C., and washed three times with cold PBS. Treated cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Junsei, Tokyo, Japan) for 10 minutes at room temperature, washed three times with PBS, and mounted with VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium (Vector laboratories, Burlingame, Calif., USA) with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) for nuclear staining. The intracellular localization of the fluorescent signal was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (top) and by Nomarski interference microscope image of the same cells (LSM700, Zeiss, Germany).

As shown in FIG. 25, the aMTD/SD-fused BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2/7M-3 and 2/7M-4) exhibited superior cell permeability, compared to the BMP2/7 recombinant proteins lacking aMTD or SD (2/7M-1 and 2/7M-2). In particular, 2M-4 and 7M-4 were found to have the highest cell permeability.

Consequently, 2M-3, 7M-3, 2M-4 and 7M-4 showing excellent cell permeability as well as excellent solubility and yield were determined as CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins.

Example 9. Determination of Tissue-Permeability of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant

Proteins

For tissue-permeability, ICR mouse (6-week-old, male) were injected intraperitoneally (600 ug/head) with vehicle, FITC only or FITC-conjugated BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2M-4, 2M-4C, 7M-4 and 7M-4C). After 2 hours, the organs (brain, heart, lung, liver, spleen and kidney) were isolated, washed with O.C.T. compound (Sakura), and frozen in deep freezer. Cryosections (15 um thickness) were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy.

As shown in FIG. 26, the aMTD/SD-fused CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2M-4 and 7M-4) expressed FITC signals in many organs (brain, hear, lung, liver, spleen and kidney), compared to the BMP recombinant proteins lacking aMTD (2M-4C and 7M-4C). As a result, it was confirmed that the BMP2/7 recombinant protein has cell permeability by aMTD.

Example 10. Determination of Biological Activity of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant Proteins In Vitro

<10-1> Inhibition of Myotube Formation

C2C12 myoblasts (ATCC, USA) were cultured with high glucose DMEM (Hyclone) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone) at 37° C. for growth and expansion. The C2C12 cells were plated on 24-well culture plate (1×10⁵ cells/well) in the growth media for 24 hours. To induce the differentiation, the cells were exposed to a starvation condition with 2% of FBS in a culture media with or without BMP2/7 recombinant proteins. The BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2M-1, 7M-1, 2M-4 and 7M-4) were treated with different concentration (0.1, 0.5, 0, 5 uM). After 3 days and 7 days of culture, the cell morphologies were photographed to determine the differentiation into either myotube formation.

As shown in FIG. 27, the inhibitory effects on myotube formation of C2C12 cells were not shown at the low concentrations (0.1 and 0.5 uM) of 2M-1, 7M-1, 2M-4 and 7M-4. However, treatment of 2M-1 or 7M-1 at 1 uM significantly inhibited the myotube formation, which manifests the transition of lineage differentiation from myogenic to osteogenic. Highest concentration 5 uM of 2M-1 has shown weak cytotoxicity, while same dose of 7M-1 has shown strong inhibition of myotubes formation without any cytotoxic effect. Unlike what has been previously expected, 2M-4 and 7M-4 did not affect and differentiation of the C2C12 cells even at the high doses (1 and 5 uM). Therefore, we have selected 1 uM of BMP2/7 recombinant protein as the effective concentration for further experiments.

<10-2> Activation of Smad Signaling Pathway

To investigate the activation of BMP-Smad signaling, C2C12 cells were cultured with high glucose DMEM (Hyclone) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone) at 37° C. for growth and expansion. The cells were plated on 24-well culture plate (1×10⁵ cells/well) in the growth media for 24 hours. The cells were incubated with serum-free medium alone (α-MEM or DMEM) containing 10 uM of BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2/7M-3, 2/7M-3C, 2/7M-4 and 2/7M-4C) of indicated concentration for 15 minutes. The cells treated BMP2/7 recombinant proteins were lysed in a lysis buffer (RIPA buffer) containing a protease cocktail and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigam). Equal amounts of cell lysate protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The protein transferred membranes were incubated to block non-specific binding sites in immersing the membrane in 5% skim milk. The membranes were incubated with anti-phosphorylated Smad1/5/8 (Cellsignaling) overnight at 4° C. and anti-6-actin

(Santacruz) at room temperature (RT) and then incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 hour at RT. The blots were developed using a chemiluminescence detection system and exposed to an x-ray film.

As shown in FIG. 28, p-Smad 1/5/8 activities of 2M-4 and 7M-4 were similar to that of vehicle, and 2M-3 and 7M-3 showed the excellent p-Smad 1/5/8 activity.

<10-3> ALP Activity

To investigate whether the CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins directly affect osteogenic activity, an ALP activity assay was performed.

Mouse pre-osteoblast, MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured in the minimum essential medium (MEM) alpha modification (Hyclone) with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. ALP activity was measured with cell lysate, according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, supernatant of cell lysate was used after 13000 rpm of centrifugation for 10 min, and 10 ul of supernatant was reacted with 200 ul of ALP substrate solution for 30 minutes at 37° C. After 30 minutes, the optical density (O.D) was measured by using microplate reader at 405 nm of wave length. Different concentrations of p-Nitrophenyl Phosphate were used as standards for ALP activity, and calculated ALP activities were normalized by total protein concentration, which was obtained from bradford (Bio-rad) protein assay.

As shown in FIG. 29, the treatment of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2M-3, 7M-3, 2M-4 and 7M-4) showed ALP activity, compared to treatment of the control proteins (2/7M-3C and 2/7M-4C). In particular, 2M-3 as the BMP2 recombinant protein showed 3-folds higher ALP activity than 2M-4, and both 7M-3 and 7M-4 as the BMP7 recombinant protein showed excellent ALP activity.

<10-4> Combinational Treatment of CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 Recombinant Proteins

To evaluated synergistic effect of CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 recombinant proteins on osteogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts, inhibitory of myotube formation and ALP activity were investigated.

In the same manner as in Example <10-1>, single treatment or co-treatment with each 1 uM of CP-BMP2 and/or CP-BMP7 recombinant proteins (2M-4 and 7M-4) was performed in the C2C12 cells. After 3 days and 7 days of culture, cell morphologies were photographed to determine the differentiation into either myotube formation or osteogenesis.

As shown in FIG. 30, it was confirmed that co-treatment of the CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 recombinant proteins (2M-4 and 7M-4) inhibited myotube formation, compared to single treatment of the CP-BMP2 or CP-BMP7 recombinant protein (2M-4 or 7M-4).

In the same manner as in Example <10-3>, single treatment or co-treatment with each 1 uM of CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 recombinant proteins (2M-4 and 7M-4) was performed ALP activity assay in the MC3T3-E1 cells.

As shown in FIG. 31, it was confirmed that co-treatment of the CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 recombinant proteins (2M-4 and 7M-4) significantly increased in ALP activity, compared to single treatment of CP-BMP2 or CP-BMP7 recombinant protein (2M-4 or 7M-4).

These results showed that sufficient exposure time of CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins is required for effective osteogenic differentiation. Further, combinational treatment of CP-BMP2 and CP-BMP7 synergistically induced the osteogenic differentiation of the cells.

Example 11. Determination of Biological Activity of CP-BMP2/7 Recombinant

Proteins in vivo 7.5 mg/kg of BMP2/7 recombinant proteins (2M-3, 7M-3, 2M-3C and 7M-3C) were subcutaneously injected into the calvarial bone of the B6 mouse (6 weeks, male) for 4 weeks three times a week. After 4 weeks, the calvarial bone was separated. Also, samples were decalcified using Rapidcal for 2 weeks (BBC Biochemical, Mount Vernon, Wash., USA) by replacing the solution every 2 days. Samples were dehydrated with graded EtOH (70 to 100%), toluene, and paraffin. Dehydrated samples were embedded in paraffin wax and hardened into a paraffin block for sectioning. Specimens were cut to 6 urn using a microtome (Shandon, Runcorn, Cheshire, GB). Sections underwent deparaffinization and hydration and stained nuclei and cytosol with Harris hematoxylin and eosin solution (H&E staining). Goldner's trichrome staining method was used to determined detailed bone tissue morphology such as mineralized collagen. Following dehydration, samples were mounted with mounting medium (Richard-Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, Mich., USA) and observed under an optical microscope (Nikon 2000, Japan).

As shown in FIG. 32, only few lining cells were observed on the surface of calvarial bone tissue in diluent treated group. In 2M-3C or 7M-3C treated group, the BMP2/7 recombinant protein without aMTD, showed increase of extra cellular matrix (ECM) formation on the surface of calvaria tissue, which indicated that the immature bone matrix formation. On the other hands, the significant increase of ECM formation was observed in 2M-3 or 7M-3 treated group, the BMP2/7 recombinant protein fused with aMTD.

As shown in FIG. 33, the new bone formation was quantified by measuring their newly formed ECM thickness. Although the 2M-3C or 7M-3C treated group showed more than 5 folds greater relative activity, 2M-3 or 7M-3 treated group showed more than 20 folds greater relative activity which compare to diluent treated group.

These results showed that the fusion of aMTD to BMP2 or BMP7 recombinant proteins, CP-BMP2/7 recombinant proteins, resulted in great increase of their bioactivity such as new bone formation.

Example 12. Determination of Biological Activity of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins In Vitro

<12-1> Expression and Purification of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins

To improve cell-permeability and activity of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, different aMTD-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins were prepared (FIG. 34).

First, the expression vectors were designed for CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins fused with aMTD₁, aMTD₃, aMTD₆₁, aMTD₁₂₄, aMTD₂₄₁, aMTD₃₂₁, aMTD₃₈₅, aMTD₄₀₃, aMTD₄₄₂, aMTD₄₈₁, aMTD₅₆₃, aMTD₅₈₅, aMTD₆₀₃, aMTD₆₂₃, aMTD₈₄₇, aMTD₈₉₇, aMTD₈₉₉. The expression vectors were expressed in the same manner as in Example <6-1>, PCR primers for CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins fused with aMTD and SD are summarized in Table 45.

As a result, it was confirmed that the expression vectors which CP-BMP2 recombinant protein fused with aMTD₁, aMTD₃, aMTD₆₁, aMTD₁₂₄, aMTD₂₄₁, aMTD₃₂₁, aMTD₃₈₅, aMTD₄₀₃, aMTD₄₄₂, aMTD563, aMTD₅₈₅, aMTD₆₀₃, aMTD₆₂₃, aMTD₈₄₇, aMTD₈₉₇ and aMTD₈₉₉, except for aMTD₄₈₁, were prepared.

TABLE 45 Abbrevi- Primer Sequence (5′→3′) No. ation Forword Reverse  1 HM₁B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGGCGGCGCTGGCGCCGGTGGTGCTGGCGCTGCCGCA CGCGTCGACTTACCTCGGCT AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG GCACCGGCACGGAGATGAC  2 HM₃B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGGCGGCGCTGGCGCCGGTGGTGCTGGCGCTGCCGC AAGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG  3 HM₆₁B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGTGGCGGCGCTGCCGGTGCTGCTGGCGGCGCTGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG  4 HM₁₂₄B2MSA ATTTATCATATGATTGCGGTGGCGCTGCCGGCGCTGATTGCGGCGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG  5 HM₂₄₁B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGGCGGCGGTGGTGCCGGTGCTGCTGGTGGCGCCGC AAGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG  6 HM₃₂₁B2MSA ATTTATCATATGATTGTGGCGGTGGCGCTGCCGGCGCTGGCGGTGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG  7 HM₃₈₅B2MSA ATTTATCATATGATTGTGGCGATTGCGGTGCCGGCGCTGGTGGCGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG  8 HM₄₀₃B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGGCGGCGCTGGTGATTCCGGCGGCGATTCTGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG  9 HM₄₄₂B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGCTGGCGGCGCTGGTGCCGGCGGTGCTGGTGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG 10 HM₆₀₃B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGTGCTGGTGGCGCTGGCGGCGCCGGTGATTGCGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG 11 HM₅₆₃B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGCTGGCGGTGATTGTGGTGCCGGCGCTGGCGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG 12 HM₄₈₁B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGATTGCGATTGCGATTGTGCCGGTGGCGCTGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG 13 HM₅₈₅B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGCTGATTGTGGCGATTGCGCCGGCGCTGGTGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG 14 HM₆₂₃B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGTGGCGGCGGCGATTGCGCTGCCGGCGATTGTGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG 15 HM₈₄₇B2MSA ATTTATCATATGCTGGTGGCGATTGTGGTGCTGCCGGCGGTGGCGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG 16 HM₈₉₇B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGGTGATTGTGCCGGTGGCGATTATTGCGGCGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG 17 HM₈₉₉B2MSA ATTTATCATATGGCGGTGGTGATTGCGCTGCCGGCGGTGGTGGCGCCGCA AGCCAAACACAAACAGCGG

The expression vectors expressed respective CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins, in the same manner as in Example <6-2>. The 12 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, except for recombinant proteins fused with aMTD₁, aMTD₈₄₂, aMTD₈₉₉, were expressed. Solubility and yield of the 12 different CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins were measured in the same manner as in Example <6-3>.

As shown in FIGS. 35a and 35b , the 12 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins were successfully expressed and purified, and the solubility and yield of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins were increased. In particular, the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins fused with aMTD₂₄, aMTD₄₄₂, aMTD₅₆₃ and aMTD₆₂₃ were found to have high solubility.

<12-2> Determination of Cell-Permeability of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins

The cell-permeability of the 13 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins was investigated in the same manner as in Example 8. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with the 13 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins, vehicle or only FITC.

As shown in FIGS. 36a and 36b , aMTD-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins have excellent cell permeability. In particular, CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins fused with aMTD₂₄, aMTD₄₄₂, aMTD₅₆₃ and aMTD₆₂₃ were found to have high cell permeability.

<12-3> Determination of Biological Activity of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins

To determine biological activity of 4 different types of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein having excellent cell permeability, an ALP assay was performed in the same manner as in Example <10-3>. C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells were treated with CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins fused with aMTD₂₄, aMTD₄₄₂, aMTD₅₆₃ and aMTD₆₂₃, or control (vehicle).

As shown in FIG. 37, treatment of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein showed ALP activity, compared to treatment of the control (vehicle). In particular, aMTD₄₄₂-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was showed higher ALP activity. Further, in C2C12 myoblasts and MC3T3-El preosteoblasts, treatment of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins fused with aMTD₄₄₂ showed higher ALP activity.

As in the following Table 46, solubility, cell-permeability and biological activity of each of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins fused with different aMTDs (aMTD₁, aMTD₃, aMTD₆₁, aMTD₁₂₄, aMTD₂₄₁, aMTD₃₂₁, aMTD₃₈₅, aMTD₄₀₃, aMTD₄₄₂, aMTD₄₈₁, aMTD₅₆₃, aMTD₅₈₅, aMTD₆₀₃, aMTD₆₂₃, aMTD₈₄₇, aMTD₈₉₇, aMTD₈₉₉) were compared.

TABLE 46 Solubility Cell-Permeabillity Biological Activity Yield Rel. ALP Rank aMTD (mg/L) Rank aMTD fold Rank aMTD activity 1 623 51 1 623 19.9 1 449 6.92 2 563 48 2 442 11.5 2 563 5.24 3 442 47 3 24 8.5 3 623 5.23 4 24 42 4 563 7.9 4 24 2.97

The aMTD₄₄₂-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant protein showing the most excellent biological activity as well as excellent solubility and cell-permeability was determined as an optimal CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and this aMTD₄₄₂-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was subjected to subsequent experiments.

Example 13. Determination of Cell-Permeability of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein

To investigate cell-permeability of the aMTD₄₄₂-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, RAW 264.7 cells and NIH3T3 cells were used in the same manner as in Example 8. The RAW 264.7 cells and NIH3T3 cells were treated with the FITC-labeled CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins, vehicle, FITC only or control protein (BMP2).

As shown in FIGS. 38 and 39, it was confirmed that aMTD/SD-fused CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2) exhibited superior cell-permeability, compared to the BMP2 which lacking aMTD/SD. These results suggest that the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein fused with aMTD₄₄₂ is enhanced its cell-permeability and therefore, aMTD₄₄₂ is critical for systemic delivery of the BMP.

Example 14. Determination of Biological Activity of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein In Vitro

To reinvestigate the biological activity of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein which showed excellent effects on bone formation in vivo, osteogenic differentiations were examined in the C2C12 myoblasts, C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts.

<14-1> Inhibition of Myotube Formation

In the same manner as in Example <10-1>, the C2C12 myoblasts were incubated with serum-free medium containing 1 uM of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins or vehicle for 2 hours, and washed out with PBS. Then, the cells incubated for 7 days under 2% FBS media without any additional treatment of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins. The cell morphologies were photographed to determine the differentiation into either myotube formation.

As shown in FIG. 40b , treatment of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins showed inhibition of myotube formation, compared to treatment of the vehicle.

<14-2> ALP Activity

C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells (ATCC, USA) were maintained in the Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI) 1640 (Hyclone) with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. To induce the osteogenic differentiation, the cells were exposed to a starvation condition with a serum-free culture media. The cells were incubated with serum-free medium containing 1 uM of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2), control protein (Non-CP-BMP2; BMP2 recombinant protein fused with his-tag and SD) or vehicle for 2 hours and washed out with PBS. The culture media changed with 10% FBS. After 7 days of culture, ALP activity was measured in the same manner as in Example <10-3>.

As shown in FIG. 41, treatment of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2) showed 11-folds higher ALP activity than treatment of the vehicle, and 3-folds higher ALP activity than treatment of the control protein (Non-CP-BMP2).

C2C12 myoblasts were incubated with serum-free medium containing 1 uM of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins or vehicle for 2 hours, and washed out with PBS. Then, the cells incubated for 7 days under 2% FBS media without any additional treatment of 1 uM of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2), control protein (Non-CP-BMP2; BMP2 recombinant protein fused with his-tag and SD) or vehicle for 2 hours and washed out with PBS. The culture media changed with 10% FBS. After 7 days of culture, ALP activity was measured in the same manner as in Example <10-3>.

MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts (ATCC, USA) were maintained in Alpha Modification of Eagle's Minimum Essential Media (α-MEM) (Hyclone) with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. To induce the osteogenic differentiation, the cells were exposed to a starvation condition with a serum-free culture media included 50 mg/mL ascorbic acid, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (SFOM). The cells were incubated with SFOM containing I uM of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2), control protein (Non-CP-BMP2) or vehicle for 2 hours and washed out with PBS. After 7 days of culture, ALP activity was measured in the same manner as in Example <10-3>.

As a result, in C2C12 myoblasts and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts, treatment of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2) showed higher ALP activity than treatment of the vehicle and control protein (Non-CP-BMP2).

Example 15. Determination of Mechanism of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins

To investigate the mechanism of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, intracellular activity and binding of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein were examined.

<15-1> Activation of Smad Signaling Pathway

To investigate the activation of Smad signaling, C2C12 cells were incubated with 1 M of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2), control protein (Non-CP-BMP2) or vehicle in the same manner as in Example <10-2>.

As shown in FIG. 42, treatment of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins showed p-Smad 1/5/8 phosphorylation. And, treatment of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins showed significantly increased p-Smad 1/5/8 phosphorylation, compared to treatment of the control protein (non-CP-BMP2).

To investigate the activation of Smad signaling, C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were incubated with 1 M of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2), control protein (Non-CP-BMP2) and vehicle in the same manner as in Example <10-2>.

As a result, in C2C12 myoblasts and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts, treatment of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins showed p-Smad 1/5/8 phosphorylation. And, treatment of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins showed significantly increased p-Smad 1/5/8 phosphorylation, compared to treatment of the control protein (non-CP-BMP2).

<15-2> Binding of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Protein and BMP Receptor

To investigate why the Smad signal of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins is stronger than that of the control protein, co-localization of BMP2 and BMP receptor was examined.

MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were cultured in 10% FBS-supplemented α-MEM (Modification). The cells were seeded in an 8-well slide chamber at a density of 5×10³ cells/well, and incubated for 24 hours. The cells were incubated in serum-free media (α-MEM) for 2 hours, and treated with 1 uM of FITC-labeled Plain-BMP2 recombinant proteins (Plain-BMP2, BMP2 fused with his-tag only), FITC-labeled CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2) or vehicle, followed by incubation for 2 hours. The cells were washed with PBS three times, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes. The cells were washed with PBS three times, followed by permeabilization with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15 minutes and incubation in a blocking buffer (3% BSA-0.05% Triton X-100) for 30 minutes. Anti-BMP receptor II Ab (santa cruz, dilution 1:100) was diluted with an Ab reaction buffer (1% BSA and 0.05% Triton X-100), and 100 ul thereof was treated to cells, followed by incubation for 1 hour. The cells were washed with PBS, and then incubated for 30 minutes in a PE-conjugated anti-goat IgG Ab (Bioss, dilution 1:100)-diluted Ab reaction buffer. Then, the cells were washed with PBS and treated with Cy-5.5-conjugated anti-PDI Ab (Bioss, ER marker) or Cy-5-conjugated anti-giantin Ab (Bioss, gogi marker), followed by incubation for 1 hour. The cells mounted with VECTASHIELD Mounting (with DAPI) (Vector laboratories, Burlingame, Calif., USA), and the intracellular localization of the fluorescent signal was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM800, Zeiss, Germany)

As shown in FIG. 43, the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein including aMTD permeated cells, and thus co-localized with ER or golgi. However, it was confirmed that the control protein (Plain-BMP2) and vehicle did not permeate cells.

As a result, since the aMTD-fused BMP (CP-BMP2 recombinant protein) is co-localized with BMP receptors in intracellular ER and golgi, strong Smad activity by CP-BMP2 recombinant protein is observed.

Example 16. Determination of Effect of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins In Vivo

The effect of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins on bone formation and regeneration was investigated.

<16-1> New Bone Formation

7.5 mg/kg of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2), vehicle (diluent) or control protein (Non-CP-BMP2) were subcutaneously injected into the calvarial bone of the B6 mouse (6 weeks, male) for 4 weeks three times a week. After 4 weeks, the calvarial bone was separated, followed by decalcification for 3 weeks. Paraffin blocks of the calvarial bone were prepared, followed by sectioning. After deparaffination of the sections, new bone formation was determined by using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining.

As shown in FIG. 44a , only few lining cells were observed on the surface of calvarial bone tissue in diluent treated group. In non-CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins treated group, the BMP2 protein without aMTD, showed increase of extra cellular matrix (ECM) formation on the surface of calvaria tissue, which indicated that the immature bone matrix formation. On the other hands, the significant increase of ECM formation was observed in CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins treated group, the BMP2 protein fused with aMTD.

As shown in FIG. 44b , the new bone formation was quantified by measuring newly formed ECM thickness. Although the non-CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins treated group showed more than 6 folds greater relative activity (P<0.001), CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins treated group showed more than 22 folds greater relative activity which compare to diluent treated group (P<O. 001).

<16-2> Calvarial Critical-Sized Defect Model

The effect of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins for bone regeneration in vivo was investigated by calvarial critical sized defect model using ICR mouse (6 weeks) (Dooyeol biothec, Seoul, Korea). The mice were anesthetized with Zoletil (60 mg/kg) and Xylazine (20 mg/kg) and exposed incision area by shaving scalp hair. For defect creation, head skin incision was performed; two defects on both sides of the calvaria were made by using 4 mm-diameter surgical trephine bur. Surgery sites were sutured and treated with Povidone iodine. After 24 hours of surgery, the CP-BMP2, non-CP-BMP2 or diluent was locally injected to surgery site, and the injection was repeated for 8 weeks three times a week during experimental periods. All mice were sacrificed after 9 weeks, and the calvarial bone was separated and bone regeneration was examined by x-ray and Micro-CT. The fixed calvarial tissues were exposed to soft X-rays (CMP-2, Softex Co., Tokyo, Japan) under optimized exposure condition (23 kV, 2 mA, 90 s). The exposed results were obtained by the developing film. Three-dimensional images from micro-CT scanning were analyzed with Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, CA, USA) to measure regenerated bone areas.

As shown in FIGS. 45a and 45b , the group treated with CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2) showed 8 times higher bone regeneration than the group treated with vehicle (diluent).

To determine administration frequency of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, to 4 groups of ICR mouse (6 weeks), each group having 6 mice, 7.5 mg/kg of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2), vehicle (diluent) or control protein (Non-CP-BMP2) were subcutaneously injected once or three times a week for 8 weeks. The calvarial bone was separated and bone regeneration was examined by X-ray and Micro-CT.

As shown in FIGS. 46a and 46b , bond regeneration was observed in all groups treated with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein once a week or three times a week. The administration frequency was determined as once a week for 8 weeks.

To determine the administration concentration of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, 0, 0.75, 3.75, 7.5, 15, 75, or 150 mg/kg of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2) were subcutaneously injected to 7 groups of ICR mouse (6 weeks), each group having 10 mice, once a week for 8 weeks. The calvarial bone was separated and bone regeneration was examined by X-ray and Micro-CT.

As shown in FIGS. 47a and 47b , bond regeneration was observed in all groups treated with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein. Excellent bone regeneration effect was also observed in the groups treated with low concentration (7.5 mg/kg). Thus, the administration concentration was determined as 7.5 mg/kg.

As a result, when 7.5 mg/kg of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was administered once a week for 8 weeks, excellent bone regeneration effect may be expected in mouse.

<16-3> Equine Bone Defect Model

To investigate the efficacy of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein in a large animal, 3rd metatarsal bones of both hind limbs of a horse was drilled (diameter 4.5 mm×depth 10 mm) to prepare an equine hind limb hole defect model (FIGS. 48 and 49 b). rBMP2 (BMP2; Korea) or CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2) was subcutaneously injected to the defected site of the left limb, once a week for 8 weeks. Further, to compare the BMP2 administration method using a scaffold, rhBMP2 (Original; Cowell®, Korea) or CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2), together with a collagen scaffold, were injected to the defected site of the right limb during operation. After operation, bone regeneration was examined by portable X-ray every week, and at 9 weeks, and the horse was sacrificed, followed by CT examination.

Structures of rBMP2 (BMP2), rhBMP2 (Original), and CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2) were showed in FIG. 48, and information about the horse was showed in FIG. 49a , and images of X-ray and CT were showed in FIG. 49 b.

As shown in FIG. 50, in the group with scaffold, the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2) confirmed the bone regeneration effect similar to rhBMP2 (Original) (original: 1±0.35, CP-BMP2: 0.81±0.31, p=0.345). In the group without scaffold, the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2) confirmed about 8.6-folds higher bone regeneration effect than rBMP2 (BMP2) (BMP2: 1±0.36, CP-BMP2: 8.68±1.31, p<0.05).

As shown in FIG. 49b , completely bone regeneration by treatment of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins was observed from CT at 9 weeks.

As a result, the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein confirmed excellent bone regeneration effect on mouse and horse, compared to the BMP2 recombinant protein lacking aMTD, suggesting efficient intracellular delivery of BMP2 by aMTD and effective regeneration of defected bone by the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein.

Example 17. Determination of Toxicity of CP-BMP2 Recombinant Proteins

To investigate toxicity of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein in vivo, a toxicity assay was performed.

<17-1> Single Dose Acute Toxicity Assay

A toxicity assay was performed after single administration of ICR mouse (5 weeks) with high concentration of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein. A group was comprised of 5 male mice and 5 female mice. Each 75, 100, 150, or 200 mg/kg of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was intravenously administered once, or 1000 mg/kg thereof was subcutaneously administered. The survival of mouse was examined for 2 weeks. A control group was administered with a vehicle at a volume equal to the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein.

In FIG. 51, the survival rate for only 5 days was for acute toxicity of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, but the examination was actually performed for 2 weeks.

As shown in FIG. 51, death of only one female mouse was observed in the group intravenously administered with 200 mg/kg of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and all mice survived in other groups. Reduction in voluntary exercise was observed in the group subcutaneously administered with 1000 mg/kg of CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, but this symptom was not observed at 1 day after administration.

<17-2> Repeated Dose Toxicity Assay

A toxicity assay was performed after repeated subcutaneous administration of ICR mouse (6 weeks) with the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein for 2 weeks. A group was comprised of 5 male mice and 5 female mice.

The group treated with CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was administered with each 1.875, 3.75, or 7.5 mg/kg/day of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein, and a control group was administered with a vehicle at a volume equal to the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein. For 2 weeks after administration, the mice were weighed. After 2 weeks, all mice were sacrificed, and measured the weights of the organs (brain, liver, heart, spleen, and kidney).

As shown in FIGS. 52a and 52b , all mice in the group treated with CP-BMP2 recombinant protein and the control group survived, and there were no significant weight changes in the body weight and organs.

As a result, it was confirmed that the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein has no in vivo toxicity.

Example 18. Determination of Pharmacokinetics of CP-BMP2 Recombinant

Proteins

To determinate of pharmacokinetics of CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins, bioavailability of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins was investigated in vitro and in vivo.

<18-1> Bioavailability in vivo

ICR mouse (male, 6 weeks) were intravenously administered with 30 mg/kg of FITC-labeled CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2) or control protein; rBMP2 (BMP2), and then the blood was collected every 10 minutes, and the spleen was separated every 2 hours.

The blood was immediately put in an EDTA tube and mixed well, followed by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm and 4° C. for 5 minutes. Plasma was removed from the centrifuged blood, and only buffy coat was collected in a new microtube. 0.5 mL of RBC lysis buffer was put in the microtube, followed by vortexing. The microtube was left at room temperature for 5 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm and 4° C. for 5 minutes. (When RBCs were not completely removed, 0.5 mL of RBC lysis buffer was put again, followed by vortexing). After removing a supernatant, a pellet was peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and added 0.3 mL of PBS, followed by pipetting.

The spleen was separated into single cells using a slide glass or cell strainer in the presence of PBS. The cells were collected in a microtube, followed by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm and 4° C. for 5 minutes. After removing a supernatant, 0.5 mL of RBC lysis buffer was added thereto, followed by vortexing. The microtube was left at room temperature for 5 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm and 4° C. for 5 minutes. (When RBCs were not completely removed, 0.5 mL of RBC lysis buffer was put again, followed by vortexing). After removing a supernatant, a pellet was splenocytes, and added 0.5 mL of PBS, followed by pipetting. The PBMC and splenocyte were subjected to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (FACSCalibur; BD, Franklin Lakes, N.J.).

As shown in FIG. 53, in the PBMCs, the highest peak of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2) was detected at 10 minutes, but no control protein (BMP2) was detected. In the splenocytes, the highest peak of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2) was detected at 2 hours, whereas the highest peak of the control protein (BMP2) was detected at 10 minutes, but the peak was lower than that of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2). High concentration of the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2) was detected and maintained for 8 hours, compared to the control protein (BMP2).

<18-2> Bioavailability Ex Vivo

The whole blood was obtained from ICR mouse (6 weeks), and then mixed with respective CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2) or control protein (BMP2; Plain-BMP2). A ratio of blood and protein was 7.5 ug of protein per 1 mL of blood, based on in vivo study. The blood and each protein were allowed to react at each time point. After reaction, plasma was separated from the blood, and histidine included in the plasma was detected by His-ELISA (Genscript Co.).

As shown in FIG. 54, in ex vivo, high concentration was also detected for a long period of time upon treatment of CP-BMP2, compared to treatment of BMP2 (Plain-BMP2).

<18-3> Bioavailability for Duration Time In Vivo

15 mg/kg of Cy5-labeled CP-BMP2 recombinant protein (CP-BMP2) or control protein (Non-CP-BMP2) were subcutaneously injected into the calvarial bone of ICR mouse (6 weeks). Distribution of Cy5-labeled proteins was measured at each time point by using a bio-imaging analyzer (KODAK Image Station 4000MM).

As shown in FIG. 55, high concentration of the CP-BMP2 recombinant proteins (CP-BMP2) was detected for a long period of time, compared to the control protein (Non-CP-BMP2).

As a result, the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein was stably maintained in vivo for a long period of time, indicating that when the CP-BMP2 recombinant protein is applied to drugs, it is maintained for a long period of time to efficiently activity and functions of BMP2 in vivo.

Those skilled in the art to which embodiments of the present invention pertain will appreciate that the embodiments of the present invention may be implemented in different forms without departing from the essential characteristics thereof. Therefore, it should be understood that the disclosed embodiments are not limitative, but illustrative in all embodiments. The scope of the present invention is made to the appended claims rather than to the foregoing description, and all variations which come within the range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein. 

The invention claimed is:
 1. A recombinant protein, which comprises a BMP being one of BMP2 and BMP7, and an advanced macromolecule transduction domain (aMTD) being composed of 9 to 13 amino acid residues and having improved cell or tissue permeability, wherein the aMTD is fused to one end or both ends of the BMP, and wherein the aMTD has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:
 101. 2. The recombinant protein according to claim 1, which further comprises one or more solubilization domain (SD)(s) fused to the end(s) of one or more of the BMP and the aMTD, wherein the SD(s) independently have an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 799 to
 805. 3. The recombinant protein according to claim 2, wherein the recombinant protein is represented by any one of the following structural formula: A-B-C, A-C-B, B-A-C, B-C-A, C-A-B, C-B-A and A-C-B-C wherein A is the aMTD, B is the BMP having one of BMP2 and BMP7, and C is the SD.
 4. The recombinant protein according to claim 1, wherein the BMP has an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 815 to
 818. 5. The recombinant protein according to claim 4, wherein the BMP is encoded by a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 819 to
 823. 6. The recombinant protein according to claim 1, wherein the aMTD is encoded by the polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO:
 341. 7. The recombinant protein of claim 2, wherein the SD(s), independently, are encoded by a polynucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 806 to
 812. 8. The recombinant protein according to claim 1, wherein the fusion is formed via a peptide bond or a chemical bond.
 9. The recombinant protein according to claim 1, wherein the recombinant protein is used for the regeneration of defected bone.
 10. A method for preparing the recombinant protein of claim 1, comprising: culturing a transformant transformed with a recombinant expression vector comprising a polynucleotide that encodes the recombinant protein in a culture medium to produce the recombinant protein; and recovering the recombinant protein expressed by the culturing.
 11. A pharmaceutical composition comprising the recombinant protein of claim 1 as an active ingredient; and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
 12. A method of regenerating of defected bone in a subject in need thereof comprising: administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of the recombinant protein according to claim
 1. 